• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

展示各种矢状和垂直模式的侧貌照片的美学评估。

Esthetic evaluation of profile photographs showing various sagittal and vertical patterns.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey.

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021 Mar;159(3):281-291. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.12.027. Epub 2021 Jan 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.12.027
PMID:33487496
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to determine the esthetic preferences of people at different levels of society and also to determine whether this preference is affected by sex, age, education level, social status, geographic region, and individual profile factors.

METHODS

Facial profile photographs of 1 man and 1 woman, each having a profile designated as ideal (the ideal profile), were digitized. The sagittal and vertical dimensions of these photographs were modified, and 9 variations of each profile picture were obtained using different combinations of alterations. The photographs were scored by 373 participants. For the analysis, Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis-H tests were used in the comparison of the scores.

RESULTS

The ideal profile was the most preferred in both sexes, whereas the least preferred was a severe Class III malocclusion with a reduced vertical dimension of 8 mm. In general, esthetics decreased as it moved away from the ideal profile in a sagittal or vertical direction.

CONCLUSIONS

Some factors from among those sampled (sex, age, education, social status, geographic region, and personal profile) affected esthetic preference, whereas others did not.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在确定不同社会阶层人群的审美偏好,同时确定这种偏好是否受到性别、年龄、教育水平、社会地位、地理位置和个体特征因素的影响。

方法

对 1 名男性和 1 名女性的面型照片进行数字化处理,每位被试者的面型均设定为理想(理想面型)。通过改变这些照片的矢状和垂直维度,使用不同的组合改变,获得了每个面型照片的 9 种变化。由 373 名参与者对照片进行评分。为了进行分析,在评分比较中使用了 Mann-Whitney U 和 Kruskal Wallis-H 检验。

结果

在两性中,理想面型是最受欢迎的,而最不受欢迎的是严重的 III 类错颌畸形,垂直维度减少 8mm。总的来说,面型的美观度随着其在矢状或垂直方向上远离理想面型而降低。

结论

在所抽样的一些因素(性别、年龄、教育、社会地位、地理位置和个人特征)中,一些因素影响了审美偏好,而其他因素则没有。

相似文献

1
Esthetic evaluation of profile photographs showing various sagittal and vertical patterns.展示各种矢状和垂直模式的侧貌照片的美学评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021 Mar;159(3):281-291. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.12.027. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
2
Facial profile preferences among various layers of Turkish population.土耳其不同阶层人群对面部轮廓的偏好
Angle Orthod. 2004 Oct;74(5):640-7. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0640:FPPAVL>2.0.CO;2.
3
Validity and reliability of facial profile evaluation in vertical and horizontal dimensions from lateral cephalograms and lateral photographs.从头颅侧位片和侧位照片评估面部轮廓在垂直和水平维度上的有效性和可靠性。
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1994;9(1):43-54.
4
Perception of Facial Esthetics by Laypersons, Dental Assistants, General Dental Practitioners and Dental Specialists.外行人、牙科助理、普通牙科医生和牙科专家对面部美学的认知。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Mar 1;20(3):304-310.
5
Esthetic considerations of the long face syndrome. Part II: Class III malocclusion.
J Esthet Dent. 1994;6(2):69-72.
6
The effects of forehead and neck position on esthetics of class I, II and III profiles.额头和颈部位置对I类、II类和III类面型美学的影响。
Int J Esthet Dent. 2014 Autumn;9(3):412-25.
7
[Investigation on facial profile preferences of orthodontic patients].[正畸患者面部轮廓偏好的调查]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2012 Dec;21(6):668-72.
8
The influence of education and gender on the esthetic perception of facial profile.教育和性别对面部侧貌审美感知的影响。
Int J Esthet Dent. 2022 Feb 17;17(1):88-99.
9
A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.提供者与消费者对面部轮廓吸引力认知的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Dec;128(6):690-6; quiz 801. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.09.030.
10
Evaluation of the esthetic results of a 40-patient group treated surgically for dentoskeletal class III malocclusion.对40例接受手术治疗的牙颌面III类错牙合患者的美学效果评估。
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 2002 Fall;17(3):171-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the impact of mandibular symphysis region alterations on profile aesthetics.下颌联合区改变对侧貌美学影响的评估
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 28;15(1):14832. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99352-7.
2
Evaluation of automated photograph-cephalogram image integration using artificial intelligence models.利用人工智能模型评估自动拍摄的头颅 X 光片图像整合。
Angle Orthod. 2024 Nov 1;94(6):595-601. doi: 10.2319/010124-1.1.
3
Influence of the Rater's Gender on Assessing Facial Beauty in Adult Patients With Vertical and Horizontal Growth Patterns.
评估者性别对垂直和水平生长型成年患者面部美观评估的影响
Cureus. 2024 Jun 25;16(6):e63142. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63142. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
[Aesthetic preferences of individuals when evaluating photographs of facial profiles with different sagittal and vertical growth patterns. A cross-sectional study].[评估具有不同矢状和垂直生长模式的面部侧貌照片时个体的审美偏好。一项横断面研究]
Rev Cient Odontol (Lima). 2023 Dec 28;11(4):e174. doi: 10.21142/2523-2754-1104-2023-174. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
5
Do the Most Attractive Faces of Patients With Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Differ From Those With the Least Attractive Faces in Terms of Angular and Proportional Measurements Assessed on Frontal and Lateral Photographs?在根据正面和侧面照片评估的角度和比例测量方面,安氏Ⅱ类1分类错牙合患者中最具吸引力的面部与最不具吸引力的面部是否存在差异?
Cureus. 2023 Jan 6;15(1):e33455. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33455. eCollection 2023 Jan.
6
A CBCT Evaluation of Esthetic Preference Regarding the Perceived Facial Attractiveness of Young Korean Female Adults with a Normal Skeletal Pattern.一种 CBCT 评估:正常骨骼型态的年轻韩国成年女性对其面部吸引力感知的审美偏好。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Sep 25;22(19):7258. doi: 10.3390/s22197258.