• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院中的权力、信任与动力。

Power, trust and motivation in hospitals.

作者信息

Håvold Jon Ivar, Håvold Ole Kristian

机构信息

Norwegian University of Science and Technology , Ålesund, Norway.

Oslo Metropolitan University , Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2019 May 7;32(2):195-211. doi: 10.1108/LHS-03-2018-0023. Epub 2019 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1108/LHS-03-2018-0023
PMID:30945602
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this paper is to improve understanding of how different kinds of power influence trust and motivation in hospitals.

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: To analyze the links between power, trust and motivation, a framework of social power is tested on measures of trust in managers and motivation. Quantitative data from 137 respondents were collected. Partial least square is used to evaluate the theoretical model.

FINDINGS

Legitimate, referent and reward power has a positive influence on trust, while coercive power has a negative influence on trust. In total, 41.8 per cent of the variation in trust in managers was explained by power. Trust, reward power and expert power explained 30.9 per cent of the variation in motivation.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

The research indicates that in knowledge organizations such as hospitals, leaders should be careful in using coercive power. Expert power seems to influence motivation but not trust, while legitimate power seems to influence trust directly and motivation only through trust. Referent power seems to have a weak influence on trust and no direct influence on motivation. Reward power has a very strong influence both on trust and motivation.

ORIGINALITY/VALUE: It is important for leaders to consider how power can influence trust, motivation and the performance of a health organization. Although this study was conducted in Norway and Finland, the findings may have relevance on a broader scale.

摘要

目的

本文旨在增进对不同类型权力如何影响医院中的信任和积极性的理解。

设计/方法/途径:为分析权力、信任和积极性之间的联系,在对管理者的信任和积极性的衡量指标上测试了一种社会权力框架。收集了来自137名受访者的定量数据。采用偏最小二乘法来评估理论模型。

研究结果

法定权力、参照权力和奖赏权力对信任有积极影响,而强制权力对信任有消极影响。总体而言,权力解释了管理者信任度变化的41.8%。信任、奖赏权力和专家权力解释了积极性变化的30.9%。

实际意义

研究表明,在医院等知识型组织中,领导者在使用强制权力时应谨慎。专家权力似乎影响积极性,但不影响信任,而法定权力似乎直接影响信任,且仅通过信任影响积极性。参照权力似乎对信任影响较弱,对积极性无直接影响。奖赏权力对信任和积极性都有很强的影响。

原创性/价值:领导者考虑权力如何影响健康组织的信任、积极性和绩效很重要。尽管本研究在挪威和芬兰进行,但研究结果可能在更广泛范围内具有相关性。

相似文献

1
Power, trust and motivation in hospitals.医院中的权力、信任与动力。
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2019 May 7;32(2):195-211. doi: 10.1108/LHS-03-2018-0023. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
2
Investigating power styles and behavioural compliance for effective hospital administration.探究有效医院管理中的权力风格与行为合规性。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2019 Jul 8;32(6):958-977. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-02-2018-0059.
3
Sense of community, organizational commitment and quality of services.社区意识、组织承诺与服务质量。
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2017 Oct 2;30(4):378-393. doi: 10.1108/LHS-06-2016-0025. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
4
Methodological and conceptual issues regarding occupational psychosocial coronary heart disease epidemiology.职业心理社会因素与冠心病流行病学的方法学和概念性问题
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016 May 1;42(3):251-5. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3557. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
5
Senior management leadership, social support, job design and stressor-to-strain relationships in hospital practice.医院实践中的高层管理领导、社会支持、工作设计和应激源-应激关系。
J Health Organ Manag. 2013;27(2):171-92. doi: 10.1108/14777261311321761.
6
Power and trust in organizational relations: an empirical study in Turkish public hospitals.组织关系中的权力与信任:对土耳其公立医院的实证研究
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2015 Jan-Mar;30(1):E1-E15. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2251. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
7
Trust in health care: theoretical perspectives and research needs.对医疗保健的信任:理论观点与研究需求。
J Health Organ Manag. 2006;20(5):359-75. doi: 10.1108/14777260610701768.
8
Leadership to promote patient safety culture in public hospitals managed by social health organizations.领导能力促进社会办医疗机构公立医院患者安全文化建设。
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2023 Sep 22;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/LHS-03-2023-0017.
9
Leadership quality: a factor important for social capital in healthcare organizations.领导素质:医疗保健组织中社会资本的一个重要因素。
J Health Organ Manag. 2017 Apr 10;31(2):175-191. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-12-2016-0246.
10
Predictors of the level of personal involvement in an organization: a study of Slovene hospitals.组织中个人参与程度的预测因素:对斯洛文尼亚医院的一项研究。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2007 Jul-Sep;32(3):271-83. doi: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000281628.22526.0a.

引用本文的文献

1
Intrinsic Motivation, Attitudes, and Practices of Young Physicians Regarding Scientific Research: Cross-Sectional Study in China.年轻医生对科研的内在动机、态度及实践:中国的横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 22;27:e72633. doi: 10.2196/72633.
2
Trust in the Leader and Trust in the Organization in Healthcare: A Concept Analysis Based on a Systematic Review.医疗保健领域中对领导者的信任与对组织的信任:基于系统评价的概念分析
J Nurs Manag. 2024 Feb 22;2024:8776286. doi: 10.1155/2024/8776286. eCollection 2024.
3
Conceptualisations of Leadership and Relevance to Health and Human Service Workforce Development: A Scoping Review.
领导力的概念及其与卫生和人类服务劳动力发展的相关性:一项范围综述。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Oct 27;14:3035-3051. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S329628. eCollection 2021.
4
How medical dominance and interprofessional conflicts undermine patient-centred care in hospitals: historical analysis and multiple embedded case study in Morocco.医疗主导地位和跨专业冲突如何破坏医院以患者为中心的护理:摩洛哥的历史分析与多重嵌入式案例研究
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jul;6(7). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006140.