• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

舒缓治疗中痛苦测量工具的系统心理测量学评价研究方案。

Suffering measurement instruments in palliative care: protocol for a systematic psychometric review.

机构信息

Fundación Cudeca, Málaga, Spain.

Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga(IBIMA), Málaga, Spain.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 3;9(4):e027524. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027524.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027524
PMID:30948616
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6500222/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The prevention and relief of suffering are regarded as a goal at the end of life; therefore, suffering assessment at the end of life is essential. In this regard, we need instruments that allow us to evaluate this construct for gathering more evidence, as the assessment of suffering is increasingly used in research and the clinical setting. Many measures have been designed to assess this construct, and the selection of the most appropriate instrument is crucial. The aims of this systematic review are to (1) identify the measures assessing suffering in patients with advanced disease and their psychometric properties and (2) evaluate the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The protocol of this systematic review was developed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols Guidelines. A systematic psychometric review of measures assessing suffering in patients with advanced disease and their psychometric properties will be carried out according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN). The search strategy will be performed following the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies. Searches will be conducted in Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Medline, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, SciELO, Open Grey, Scopus, Web of Science and COSMIN database of systematic reviews, and it will be limited by time (1980-2018) and language (only literature in English and Spanish). Literature will be evaluated by two independent reviewers according to the COSMIN checklist, and measurement properties data of each study that meet the inclusion criteria will be scored independently by two researchers according to COSMIN quality ratings.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not necessary for systematic review protocols. The results will be disseminated by publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at a relevant conference.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018106488.

摘要

简介

预防和缓解痛苦被视为生命末期的目标;因此,生命末期的痛苦评估至关重要。在这方面,我们需要能够评估这一结构的工具,以收集更多的证据,因为对痛苦的评估越来越多地用于研究和临床环境。已经设计了许多措施来评估这一结构,选择最合适的工具是至关重要的。本系统评价的目的是:(1)确定评估晚期疾病患者痛苦的测量方法及其心理测量特性;(2)评估测量特性研究的方法学质量。

方法和分析

本系统评价的方案是根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目制定的。将根据共识基础的健康状况测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)对评估晚期疾病患者痛苦的测量方法及其心理测量特性进行系统的心理测量评价。搜索策略将按照同行评审电子搜索策略进行。搜索将在 Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature、Medline、PsycINFO、Cochrane Library、SciELO、Open Grey、Scopus、Web of Science 和 COSMIN 系统评价数据库中进行,并将根据时间(1980-2018)和语言(仅为英文和西班牙文文献)进行限制。文献将由两名独立的审查员根据 COSMIN 清单进行评估,符合纳入标准的每项研究的测量特性数据将由两名研究人员根据 COSMIN 质量评分独立评分。

伦理与传播

系统评价方案不需要伦理批准。研究结果将发表在同行评议的期刊上,并在相关会议上发表。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42018106488。

相似文献

1
Suffering measurement instruments in palliative care: protocol for a systematic psychometric review.舒缓治疗中痛苦测量工具的系统心理测量学评价研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 3;9(4):e027524. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027524.
2
The suffering measurement instruments in palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties.姑息治疗中的痛苦测量工具:心理测量特性的系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Oct;110:103704. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103704. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
3
Instruments for assessing health professionals' skills in breaking bad news: protocol for a systematic review of measurement properties.评估卫生专业人员在传递坏消息方面技能的工具:系统评价测量特性的方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 6;11(8):e048019. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048019.
4
Tools to assess the measurement properties of quality of life instruments: a meta-review protocol.评估生活质量量表测量属性的工具:一项元综述方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 23;8(7):e022829. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022829.
5
Multidimensional instruments with an integral approach to identify frailty in community-dwelling people: protocol for a systematic psychometric review.多维工具采用整体方法识别社区居住人群的虚弱程度:系统心理测量学综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 15;9(12):e033160. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033160.
6
A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify measures of breakthrough pain and evaluate their psychometric properties.用于系统评价和荟萃分析的方案,旨在识别突破性疼痛的测量指标并评估其心理测量学特性。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 29;10(3):e035541. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035541.
7
Evaluating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for bladder cancer: a systematic review using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.评估膀胱癌患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs):使用共识基础的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)清单进行的系统评价。
BJU Int. 2018 Nov;122(5):760-773. doi: 10.1111/bju.14368. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
8
The dietary knowledge measurement instruments in diabetes: A systematic psychometric review.糖尿病饮食知识测量工具:系统心理测量学评价。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Jun;77(6):2595-2622. doi: 10.1111/jan.14762. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
9
Psychometric properties of disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments for food allergy and food intolerance: protocol for a COSMIN-based systematic review.食物过敏和食物不耐受特异性健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)评估工具的心理测量学特性:基于 COSMIN 的系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 17;12(1):e053534. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053534.
10
Assessment tools for the measurement of the self-efficacy of drug users: protocol for a systematic review.用于测量药物使用者自我效能的评估工具:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 14;8(3):e019019. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019019.

引用本文的文献

1
Does disease incite a stronger moral appeal than health?疾病比健康更能引起强烈的道德诉求吗?
BMC Med. 2023 Nov 6;21(1):419. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03110-3.
2
Psychometric Testing of the Spanish Modified Version of the Mini-Suffering State Examination.《简化版痛苦状态量表西班牙语修订版的心理计量学测试》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 23;18(15):7821. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157821.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychometric properties of the suffering assessment questionnaire in adults with chronic diseases or life-threatening illness.慢性病或危及生命疾病成人患者痛苦评估问卷的心理测量学特性
Scand J Caring Sci. 2018 Dec;32(4):1279-1287. doi: 10.1111/scs.12569. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
2
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures.COSMIN 患者报告结局测量系统评价指南。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1147-1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
3
COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.COSMIN 患者报告结局测量系统评价偏倚风险清单。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1171-1179. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
4
The Suffering Pictogram: Measuring Suffering in Palliative Care.痛苦象形图:衡量姑息治疗中的痛苦
J Palliat Med. 2017 Aug;20(8):869-874. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0448. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
5
Suffering and dying well: on the proper aim of palliative care.善终与善逝:论姑息治疗的恰当目标。
Med Health Care Philos. 2017 Sep;20(3):413-424. doi: 10.1007/s11019-017-9764-3.
6
PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement.电子检索策略的PRESS同行评审:2015年指南声明。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
7
The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument.基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)以及如何选择结果测量仪器。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2016 Jan 19;20(2):105-13. doi: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0143.
8
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
9
Suffering assessment: a review of available instruments for use in palliative care.痛苦评估:可用于姑息治疗的现有工具的综述。
J Palliat Med. 2013 Feb;16(2):130-42. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0370. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
10
An integrated view of suffering in palliative care.姑息治疗中痛苦的综合观点。
J Palliat Care. 2012 Spring;28(1):41-9.