University of Canberra, Human-Centred Research Centre, Canberra, 2617, Australia.
School of Engineering and Information Technology, University of New South Wales, Canberra, 2612, Australia.
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 4;9(1):5645. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42098-w.
Pain is a highly unpleasant sensory and emotional experience, and no objective diagnosis test exists to assess it. In clinical practice there are two main methods for the estimation of pain, a patient's self-report and clinical judgement. However, these methods are highly subjective and the need of biomarkers to measure pain is important to improve pain management, reduce risk factors, and contribute to a more objective, valid, and reliable diagnosis. Therefore, in this study we propose the use of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and machine learning for the identification of a possible biomarker of pain. We collected pain information from 18 volunteers using the thermal test of the quantitative sensory testing (QST) protocol, according to temperature level (cold and hot) and pain intensity (low and high). Feature extraction was completed in three different domains (time, frequency, and wavelet), and a total of 69 features were obtained. Feature selection was carried out according to three criteria, information gain (IG), joint mutual information (JMI), and Chi-squared (χ). The significance of each feature ranking was evaluated using three learning models separately, linear discriminant analysis (LDA), the K-nearest neighbour (K-NN) and support vector machines (SVM) using the linear and Gaussian and polynomial kernels. The results showed that the Gaussian SVM presented the highest accuracy (94.17%) using only 25 features to identify the four types of pain in our database. In addition, we propose the use of the top 13 features according to the JMI criteria, which exhibited an accuracy of 89.44%, as promising biomarker of pain. This study contributes to the idea of developing an objective assessment of pain and proposes a potential biomarker of human pain using fNIRS.
疼痛是一种高度不愉快的感觉和情绪体验,目前还没有客观的诊断测试来评估它。在临床实践中,有两种主要的疼痛评估方法,一种是患者的自我报告,另一种是临床判断。然而,这些方法主观性很强,需要生物标志物来衡量疼痛,这对于改善疼痛管理、降低风险因素以及促进更客观、有效和可靠的诊断非常重要。因此,在这项研究中,我们提出使用功能近红外光谱(fNIRS)和机器学习来识别疼痛的可能生物标志物。我们使用定量感觉测试(QST)协议中的热测试收集了 18 名志愿者的疼痛信息,根据温度水平(冷和热)和疼痛强度(低和高)进行分组。特征提取在三个不同的域(时间、频率和小波)中完成,共获得 69 个特征。根据三个标准(信息增益(IG)、联合互信息(JMI)和卡方(χ))进行特征选择。使用三种学习模型(线性判别分析(LDA)、K-最近邻(K-NN)和支持向量机(SVM))分别评估每个特征排名的重要性,使用线性、高斯和多项式核。结果表明,高斯 SVM 在仅使用 25 个特征识别我们数据库中的四种类型疼痛时,准确率最高(94.17%)。此外,我们根据 JMI 标准提出使用前 13 个特征,其准确率为 89.44%,作为疼痛的有前途的生物标志物。这项研究有助于开发疼痛的客观评估,并提出使用 fNIRS 对人类疼痛进行潜在的生物标志物评估。