Tjaden Cathelijn D, Mulder Cornelis L, van Weeghel Jaap, Delespaul Philippe, Keet Rene, Castelein Stynke, Boumans Jenny, Leeman Eva, Malm Ulf, Kroon Hans
1Department of Reintegration and Community Care, Trimbos Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
4Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tranzo Scientific Center for Care and Welfare, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2019 Mar 22;13:15. doi: 10.1186/s13033-019-0270-2. eCollection 2019.
The resource group method provides a structure to facilitate patients' empowerment and recovery processes, and to systematically engage significant others in treatment and care. A patient chooses members of a resource group (RG) that will work together on fulfilling patients' recovery plan. By adopting shared decision-making processes and stimulating collaboration of different support systems, a broad and continuous support of patients' chosen goals and wishes is preserved and problem solving and communication skills of the RG members are addressed.
The objectives of this study are (1) to establish the effectiveness of the RG method in increasing empowerment in patients with severe mental illnesses (SMI) in the Netherlands; (2) to investigate the cost-effectiveness and cost utility of the RG method; and (3) to qualitatively explore its dynamics and processes.
METHODS/DESIGN: This multisite randomized controlled trial will compare the effects of the RG-method integrated in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) (90 patients) with those of standard FACT (90 patients). Baseline assessments and 9-month and 18-month follow-up assessments will be conducted in face-to-face home visits. The primary outcome measure, empowerment, will be assessed using the Netherlands Empowerment List (NEL). The secondary outcomes will be quality of life (MANSA); personal, community and clinical recovery (I.ROC); general, social and community functioning (WHODAS 2.0); general psychopathological signs and symptoms (BSI-18); and societal costs (TiC-P). An economic evaluation of the cost-effectiveness and cost utility of the RG method will also be conducted. A qualitative multiple case-study will be added to collect patients', RG members' and professionals' perspectives by in-depth interviews, observations and focus groups.
This trial will be the first to study the effects of the RG method on empowerment in patients with SMI. By combining clinical-effectiveness data with an economic evaluation and in-depth qualitative information from primary stakeholders, it will provide a detailed overview of the RG method as a mean of improving care for patients with SMI. The study has been registered in the Dutch Trial Register, identifier: NTR6737, September 2017.
资源小组方法提供了一种结构,以促进患者的赋权和康复过程,并系统地让重要他人参与治疗和护理。患者选择一个资源小组(RG)的成员,这些成员将共同努力实现患者的康复计划。通过采用共同决策过程并促进不同支持系统的协作,患者所选择目标和愿望能得到广泛且持续的支持,同时资源小组成员的问题解决和沟通技巧也能得到提升。
本研究的目的是:(1)确定资源小组方法在增强荷兰重症精神疾病(SMI)患者权能方面的有效性;(2)调查资源小组方法的成本效益和成本效用;(3)定性探索其动态过程。
方法/设计:这项多中心随机对照试验将比较纳入灵活积极社区治疗(FACT)的资源小组方法(90名患者)与标准FACT(90名患者)的效果。将通过面对面家访进行基线评估以及9个月和18个月的随访评估。主要结局指标,即权能,将使用荷兰权能清单(NEL)进行评估。次要结局指标将包括生活质量(MANSA);个人、社区和临床康复(I.ROC);总体、社会和社区功能(WHODAS 2.0);一般精神病理症状(BSI - 18);以及社会成本(TiC - P)。还将对资源小组方法的成本效益和成本效用进行经济评估。将增加一项定性多案例研究,通过深入访谈、观察和焦点小组收集患者、资源小组成员和专业人员的观点。
这项试验将首次研究资源小组方法对重症精神疾病患者权能的影响。通过将临床有效性数据与经济评估以及主要利益相关者的深入定性信息相结合,它将提供资源小组方法作为改善重症精神疾病患者护理手段的详细概述。该研究已在荷兰试验注册库注册,标识符:NTR6737,2017年9月。