• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

灵活主动社区治疗(FACT)实施的结果:一项前瞻性现实生活研究。

Outcomes of FLEXIBLE Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) Implementation: A Prospective Real Life Study.

作者信息

Nugter M Annet, Engelsbel Fabiana, Bähler Michiel, Keet René, van Veldhuizen Remmers

机构信息

Department of Research and Monitoring, Mental Health Service Organization GGZ Noord-Holland-Noord, PO Box 18, 1850 BA, Heiloo, The Netherlands.

Department of Community Mental Health, Mental Health Service Organization GGZ Noord-Holland-Noord, PO Box 18, 1850 BA, Heiloo, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Community Ment Health J. 2016 Nov;52(8):898-907. doi: 10.1007/s10597-015-9831-2. Epub 2015 Feb 4.

DOI:10.1007/s10597-015-9831-2
PMID:25648552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5108818/
Abstract

This study aimed to investigate social and clinical outcomes and use of care during and after implementation of FLEXIBLE Assertive Community Treatment (ACT). Three teams and 372 patients were involved. Model fidelity, clinical and social assessments were performed at baseline and after 1 and 2 years. Use of care was registered continuously. Model fidelity was good at the end of the study. Data showed much variation between patients in number and duration of ACT periods. Statistically significant improvements were found in compliance, unmet needs and quality of life. Improvement of quality of life and functioning was related to duration of ACT. The percentage of remissions increased with 9 %. The number of admissions, admission days and face to face contacts differed between ACT and non-ACT patients, but generally decreased. Findings suggest that implementation of FACT results in a more flexible adaptation of care to the needs of the patients.

摘要

本研究旨在调查灵活主动社区治疗(FLEXIBLE Assertive Community Treatment,ACT)实施期间及之后的社会和临床结局以及护理利用情况。研究涉及三个团队和372名患者。在基线以及1年和2年后进行了模式保真度、临床和社会评估。持续记录护理利用情况。研究结束时模式保真度良好。数据显示,患者在ACT周期的数量和持续时间方面存在很大差异。在依从性、未满足的需求和生活质量方面发现了具有统计学意义的改善。生活质量和功能的改善与ACT的持续时间有关。缓解率提高了9%。ACT患者和非ACT患者在入院次数、住院天数和面对面接触方面存在差异,但总体上有所减少。研究结果表明,实施FACT可使护理更灵活地适应患者的需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b1d/5108818/c1c247d0830c/10597_2015_9831_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b1d/5108818/c1c247d0830c/10597_2015_9831_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b1d/5108818/c1c247d0830c/10597_2015_9831_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Outcomes of FLEXIBLE Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) Implementation: A Prospective Real Life Study.灵活主动社区治疗(FACT)实施的结果:一项前瞻性现实生活研究。
Community Ment Health J. 2016 Nov;52(8):898-907. doi: 10.1007/s10597-015-9831-2. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
2
The effect of flexible assertive community treatment in Denmark: a quasi-experimental controlled study.丹麦灵活坚定社区治疗的效果:一项准实验对照研究。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Jan;8(1):27-35. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30424-7. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
3
A dismantling study of assertive outreach services: comparing activity and outcomes following replacement with the FACT model.一项果断外展服务的拆解研究:在替换为 FACT 模型后比较活动和结果。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2013 Jun;48(6):997-1003. doi: 10.1007/s00127-012-0602-x. Epub 2012 Oct 21.
4
Predictors of Clinical Outcome of Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) in a Rural Area in Denmark: An Observational Study with a Two-Year Follow-Up.丹麦农村地区积极社区治疗(ACT)临床结局的预测因素:一项为期两年随访的观察性研究
Community Ment Health J. 2016 Nov;52(8):908-913. doi: 10.1007/s10597-015-9908-y. Epub 2015 Jul 5.
5
Outcomes of clients in need of intensive team care in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment in Sweden.瑞典灵活积极社区治疗中需要强化团队护理的客户的治疗结果。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2018 Apr;72(3):226-231. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2018.1430168. Epub 2018 Jan 26.
6
Patient Outcomes of Flexible Assertive Community Treatment Compared With Assertive Community Treatment.与积极社区治疗相比,灵活积极社区治疗的患者结局
Psychiatr Serv. 2023 Jul 1;74(7):695-701. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220235. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
7
Assertive community treatment for elderly people with severe mental illness.积极社区治疗严重精神疾病老年患者。
BMC Psychiatry. 2010 Oct 19;10:84. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-10-84.
8
Place-Based FACT: Treatment Outcomes and Patients' Experience with Integrated Neighborhood-Based Care.基于地点的事实:基于社区综合护理的治疗结果和患者体验。
Community Ment Health J. 2024 Aug;60(6):1214-1227. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01277-4. Epub 2024 May 10.
9
Intensive case management for severe mental illness.严重精神疾病的强化个案管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 6;1(1):CD007906. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007906.pub3.
10
WITHDRAWN: Assertive community treatment for people with severe mental disorders.撤回:针对严重精神障碍患者的积极社区治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Apr 13;2011(4):CD001089. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001089.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical treatment interventions in personal recovery stories of patients with severe mental illness: a qualitative study.严重精神疾病患者个人康复故事中的临床治疗干预措施:一项定性研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 Mar 11. doi: 10.1007/s00127-025-02872-w.
2
Changes in inpatient mental health treatment and related costs before and after flexible assertive community treatment: a naturalistic observational cohort study.灵活的积极社区治疗前后住院心理健康治疗及相关费用的变化:一项自然观察队列研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 25;25(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06614-9.
3
It is harder for me: A thematic analysis of lived experience of self-care, and its relationship with self-injurious behaviors in psychiatric patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Flexible Assertive Community Treatment, Severity of Symptoms and Psychiatric Health Service Use, a Real life Observational Study.灵活的积极社区治疗、症状严重程度与精神卫生服务利用:一项现实生活观察性研究
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2013 Nov 28;9:202-9. doi: 10.2174/1745017901309010202. eCollection 2013.
2
A dismantling study of assertive outreach services: comparing activity and outcomes following replacement with the FACT model.一项果断外展服务的拆解研究:在替换为 FACT 模型后比较活动和结果。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2013 Jun;48(6):997-1003. doi: 10.1007/s00127-012-0602-x. Epub 2012 Oct 21.
3
对我来说更难:对精神科患者自我护理生活经历及其与自伤行为关系的主题分析。
Qual Res Med Healthc. 2025 Jan 23;8(Suppl 1):12544. doi: 10.4081/qrmh.2024.12544. eCollection 2024 Sep 9.
4
Assessing personal recovery in individuals with severe mental illness: validation of the Dutch Brief INSPIRE-O.评估重度精神疾病患者的个人康复情况:荷兰简版INSPIRE - O量表的效度验证
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 Jan 31. doi: 10.1007/s00127-025-02815-5.
5
Cost-effectiveness of the SMILE intervention compared with usual care for people with severe mental illness: A randomized clinical trial.与常规护理相比,SMILE干预对重症精神疾病患者的成本效益:一项随机临床试验。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 6;20(1):e0313100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313100. eCollection 2025.
6
The Practical and Social Functioning (PSF) scale: development and measurement properties of an instrument for assessing activity and social participation among people with serious mental illness.实用和社会功能量表(PSF 量表):评估严重精神疾病患者活动和社会参与情况的工具的开发和测量特性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 16;24(1):693. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06135-x.
7
Exploring New Models for Implementing Sustainable Integrated Health Access for People in Vulnerable Positions: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Multiple Case Study.探索为弱势地位人群实现可持续综合卫生服务的新模式:一项混合方法多案例研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Aug 23;13:e56197. doi: 10.2196/56197.
8
Islands in the stream: a qualitative study on the accessibility of mental health care for persons with substance use disorders in Belgium.溪流中的孤岛:对比利时物质使用障碍患者心理健康护理可及性的定性研究
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 12;15:1344020. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1344020. eCollection 2024.
9
Place-Based FACT: Treatment Outcomes and Patients' Experience with Integrated Neighborhood-Based Care.基于地点的事实:基于社区综合护理的治疗结果和患者体验。
Community Ment Health J. 2024 Aug;60(6):1214-1227. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01277-4. Epub 2024 May 10.
10
A pre-post study design: evaluating the effectiveness of a new community-based integrated service model on patient outcomes.一项前后对照研究设计:评估一种新的基于社区的综合服务模式对患者结局的有效性。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2024 May 9;18(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13033-024-00636-8.
Duration of assertive community treatment and the interpretation of routine outcome data.
维持性社区治疗的持续时间与常规结果数据的解读。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2012 Mar;46(3):240-8. doi: 10.1177/0004867411433214. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
4
Function assertive community treatment (FACT) and psychiatric service use in patients diagnosed with severe mental illness.功能式社区治疗(FACT)与精神疾病患者的精神科服务使用情况。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2011 Sep;20(3):273-8. doi: 10.1017/s2045796011000369.
5
Assertive community treatment in the Netherlands: outcome and model fidelity.荷兰的坚定社区治疗:结果和模式保真度。
Can J Psychiatry. 2011 Mar;56(3):154-60. doi: 10.1177/070674371105600305.
6
Randomised evaluation of assertive community treatment: 3-year outcomes.积极社区治疗的随机评估:3年结果
Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;195(1):81-2. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.059303.
7
A real-life observational study of the effectiveness of FACT in a Dutch mental health region.在荷兰一个心理健康区域对FACT有效性进行的一项实际观察性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2008 Dec 4;8:93. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-8-93.
8
Assertive community treatment in the Netherlands: a randomized controlled trial.荷兰的积极社区治疗:一项随机对照试验。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2007 Aug;116(2):105-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2007.01021.x.
9
FACT: a Dutch version of ACT.事实:ACT的荷兰语版本。
Community Ment Health J. 2007 Aug;43(4):421-33. doi: 10.1007/s10597-007-9089-4. Epub 2007 May 21.
10
An observational, "real life" trial of the introduction of assertive community treatment in a geographically defined area using clinical rather than service use outcome criteria.一项在特定地理区域引入积极社区治疗的观察性“现实生活”试验,该试验使用临床而非服务使用结果标准。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007 Feb;42(2):125-30. doi: 10.1007/s00127-006-0147-y. Epub 2007 Jan 17.