Suppr超能文献

在“设计胜任力”背景下患者参与住院医师评估:一项混合方法研究

Patient involvement in resident assessment within the Competence by Design context: a mixed-methods study.

作者信息

Moreau Katherine, Eady Kaylee, Jabbour Mona

机构信息

Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Can Med Educ J. 2019 Mar 13;10(1):e84-e102. eCollection 2019 Mar.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients can contribute to resident assessment in Competence by Design (CBD). This study explored the extent, nature, as well as the facilitators and hindrances of patient involvement in resident assessment within and across Canadian specialty/sub-specialty/special programs that are transitioning or have transitioned to CBD.

METHODS

We used a two-phase sequential explanatory mixed-methods design. In Phase 1, we surveyed program directors (PDs). In Phase 2, we interviewed PDs from Phase 1.

RESULTS

In Phase 1, 63 (62.4%) respondents in the CBD preparation stage, do not know if patients will be involved in resident assessment, 21 (20.8%) will involve patients, and 17 (16.8%) will not involve patients. Of those in the field-testing or implementation stages, 24 (72.7%) do not involve patients in resident assessment, five (15.2%) do involve patients, and four (12.1%) do not know if they involve patients. In Phase 2, 12 interviewees raised nine factors that facilitate or hinder patient involvement including, patients' interests/abilities, guidelines/processes for patient involvement, type of Entrustable Professional Activities, type of patient interactions in programs, and support from healthcare organizations.

CONCLUSION

Patient involvement in resident assessment is limited. We need to engage in discussions on how to support such involvement within CBD.

摘要

背景

在“以设计促进能力培养”(CBD)模式中,患者可参与住院医师评估。本研究探讨了在加拿大正在向CBD模式过渡或已过渡至该模式的专科/亚专科/特殊项目中,患者参与住院医师评估的程度、性质以及促进因素和阻碍因素。

方法

我们采用了两阶段序列解释性混合方法设计。在第一阶段,我们对项目主任(PD)进行了调查。在第二阶段,我们对第一阶段的项目主任进行了访谈。

结果

在第一阶段,处于CBD准备阶段的63名(62.4%)受访者不知道患者是否会参与住院医师评估,21名(20.8%)会让患者参与,17名(16.8%)不会让患者参与。在进行现场测试或实施阶段的受访者中,24名(72.7%)不让患者参与住院医师评估,5名(15.2%)让患者参与,4名(12.1%)不知道他们是否让患者参与。在第二阶段,12名受访者提出了9个促进或阻碍患者参与的因素,包括患者的兴趣/能力、患者参与的指南/流程、可托付专业活动的类型、项目中患者互动的类型以及医疗组织的支持。

结论

患者参与住院医师评估的情况有限。我们需要就如何在CBD模式下支持这种参与展开讨论。

相似文献

6
Managed health care and resident education.管理式医疗与住院医师教育。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jun;178(6):1157-64. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70317-5.

本文引用的文献

7
Some activity but still not much action on patient and public engagement.
Med Educ. 2016 Jan;50(1):5-7. doi: 10.1111/medu.12931.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验