• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patient involvement in resident assessment within the Competence by Design context: a mixed-methods study.在“设计胜任力”背景下患者参与住院医师评估:一项混合方法研究
Can Med Educ J. 2019 Mar 13;10(1):e84-e102. eCollection 2019 Mar.
2
Graduating Students' and Surgery Program Directors' Views of the Association of American Medical Colleges Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency: Where are the Gaps?即将毕业的医学生和外科项目主任对美国医学院协会针对进入住院医师阶段的核心可托付专业活动的看法:差距在哪里?
J Surg Educ. 2015 Nov-Dec;72(6):e184-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.07.005. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
3
"Taking Training to the Next Level": The American College of Surgeons Committee on Residency Training Survey.“将培训提升到新高度”:美国外科医师学会住院医师培训委员会调查
J Surg Educ. 2017 Nov-Dec;74(6):e95-e105. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.07.008. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
4
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
5
Resident duty hours reform: results of a national survey of the program directors and residents in neurosurgery training programs.住院医师值班时长改革:一项针对神经外科培训项目的项目主任和住院医师的全国性调查结果
Neurosurgery. 2005 Feb;56(2):398-403; discussion 398-403. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000147999.64356.57.
6
Managed health care and resident education.管理式医疗与住院医师教育。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jun;178(6):1157-64. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70317-5.
7
Entrustable Professional Activities in General Surgery: Trends in Resident Self-Assessment.普通外科可委托的专业活动:住院医师自我评估的趋势
J Surg Educ. 2020 Nov-Dec;77(6):1562-1567. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.05.005. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
8
Emergency medicine directors' perceptions on professionalism: a Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors survey.急诊医学主任对专业精神的看法:一项急诊医学住院医师主任理事会调查。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Oct;18 Suppl 2:S97-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01186.x.
9
Program Factors That Influence American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination Performance: A Multi-Institutional Study.影响美国外科委员会住院医师培训考试成绩的项目因素:一项多机构研究
J Surg Educ. 2015 Nov-Dec;72(6):e236-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.06.014. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
10
Transitioning towards senior medical resident: identification of the required competencies using consensus methodology.向高级住院医师的过渡:使用共识方法确定所需能力
Can Med Educ J. 2018 Jul 27;9(3):e64-e75. eCollection 2018 Jul.

引用本文的文献

1
Perspectives on Involving Patients in the Teaching and Assessment of Entrustable Professional Activities in Competence by Design.关于让患者参与基于设计的能力可托付专业活动的教学与评估的观点
Clin Teach. 2025 Aug;22(4):e70129. doi: 10.1111/tct.70129.
2
Patient references in the 2005 and 2015 CanMEDS frameworks.2005 年和 2015 年加拿大医学协会医学教育目标框架中的患者参考资料。
Can Med Educ J. 2023 Mar 21;14(1):63-69. doi: 10.36834/cmej.74993. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Patient involvement in assessment: How useful is it?患者参与评估:有何作用?
Med Educ. 2022 Jun;56(6):590-592. doi: 10.1111/medu.14802. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
4
A qualitative study of patients' and caregivers' perspectives on educating healthcare providers.一项关于患者及其护理人员对医疗服务提供者教育看法的定性研究。
Can Med Educ J. 2021 Sep 14;12(4):7-16. doi: 10.36834/cmej.71541. eCollection 2021 Sep.
5
From origins to legacy: the fruits of Canadian medical education scholarship.从起源到传承:加拿大医学教育学术成果
Can Med Educ J. 2019 Mar 13;10(1):e1-e4. eCollection 2019 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Introduction of Competence by Design to Canadian Nephrology Postgraduate Training.将“以设计为导向的能力培养”引入加拿大肾脏病学研究生培训
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2018 Jul 17;5:2054358118786972. doi: 10.1177/2054358118786972. eCollection 2018.
2
Exploring residents' reactions to and use of parent feedback in a pediatric emergency department: A grounded theory study.探究住院医师对儿科急诊部门家长反馈的反应和使用情况:扎根理论研究。
Med Teach. 2019 Feb;41(2):207-214. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1460658. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
3
The development of the PARENTS: a tool for parents to assess residents' non-technical skills in pediatric emergency departments.PARENTS的开发:一种供家长评估儿科急诊科住院医师非技术技能的工具。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Nov 14;17(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1042-9.
4
Changing the culture of medical training: An important step toward the implementation of competency-based medical education.改变医学培训文化:向实施基于能力的医学教育迈出的重要一步。
Med Teach. 2017 Jun;39(6):599-602. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315079.
5
Core principles of assessment in competency-based medical education.基于能力的医学教育评估的核心原则。
Med Teach. 2017 Jun;39(6):609-616. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315082.
6
A qualitative exploration of which resident skills parents in pediatric emergency departments can assess.对儿科急诊科家长能够评估哪些住院医师技能的定性探索。
Med Teach. 2016 Nov;38(11):1118-1124. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1170783. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
7
Some activity but still not much action on patient and public engagement.
Med Educ. 2016 Jan;50(1):5-7. doi: 10.1111/medu.12931.
8
Advancing Competency-Based Medical Education: A Charter for Clinician-Educators.推进基于能力的医学教育:临床教育工作者宪章。
Acad Med. 2016 May;91(5):645-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001048.
9
The views of patients, mentors and adult field nursing students on patients' participation in student nurse assessment in practice.患者、导师及成人社区护理专业学生对患者参与实习阶段护生评估的看法。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2016 Jan;16(1):202-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
10
Pediatric caregiver involvement in the assessment of physicians.儿科护理人员参与医生评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Aug 1;15:123. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0402-6.

在“设计胜任力”背景下患者参与住院医师评估:一项混合方法研究

Patient involvement in resident assessment within the Competence by Design context: a mixed-methods study.

作者信息

Moreau Katherine, Eady Kaylee, Jabbour Mona

机构信息

Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Can Med Educ J. 2019 Mar 13;10(1):e84-e102. eCollection 2019 Mar.

PMID:30949263
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6445318/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients can contribute to resident assessment in Competence by Design (CBD). This study explored the extent, nature, as well as the facilitators and hindrances of patient involvement in resident assessment within and across Canadian specialty/sub-specialty/special programs that are transitioning or have transitioned to CBD.

METHODS

We used a two-phase sequential explanatory mixed-methods design. In Phase 1, we surveyed program directors (PDs). In Phase 2, we interviewed PDs from Phase 1.

RESULTS

In Phase 1, 63 (62.4%) respondents in the CBD preparation stage, do not know if patients will be involved in resident assessment, 21 (20.8%) will involve patients, and 17 (16.8%) will not involve patients. Of those in the field-testing or implementation stages, 24 (72.7%) do not involve patients in resident assessment, five (15.2%) do involve patients, and four (12.1%) do not know if they involve patients. In Phase 2, 12 interviewees raised nine factors that facilitate or hinder patient involvement including, patients' interests/abilities, guidelines/processes for patient involvement, type of Entrustable Professional Activities, type of patient interactions in programs, and support from healthcare organizations.

CONCLUSION

Patient involvement in resident assessment is limited. We need to engage in discussions on how to support such involvement within CBD.

摘要

背景

在“以设计促进能力培养”(CBD)模式中,患者可参与住院医师评估。本研究探讨了在加拿大正在向CBD模式过渡或已过渡至该模式的专科/亚专科/特殊项目中,患者参与住院医师评估的程度、性质以及促进因素和阻碍因素。

方法

我们采用了两阶段序列解释性混合方法设计。在第一阶段,我们对项目主任(PD)进行了调查。在第二阶段,我们对第一阶段的项目主任进行了访谈。

结果

在第一阶段,处于CBD准备阶段的63名(62.4%)受访者不知道患者是否会参与住院医师评估,21名(20.8%)会让患者参与,17名(16.8%)不会让患者参与。在进行现场测试或实施阶段的受访者中,24名(72.7%)不让患者参与住院医师评估,5名(15.2%)让患者参与,4名(12.1%)不知道他们是否让患者参与。在第二阶段,12名受访者提出了9个促进或阻碍患者参与的因素,包括患者的兴趣/能力、患者参与的指南/流程、可托付专业活动的类型、项目中患者互动的类型以及医疗组织的支持。

结论

患者参与住院医师评估的情况有限。我们需要就如何在CBD模式下支持这种参与展开讨论。