Suppr超能文献

数字 PCR 可提高 DMR 的定量分析和 CML 患者 TKI 停药的选择。

Digital PCR improves the quantitation of DMR and the selection of CML candidates to TKIs discontinuation.

机构信息

Unit of Blood Diseases and Stem Cell Transplantation, DPT of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.

CREA Laboratory (Centro di Ricerca Emato-Oncologica AIL), ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2019 May;8(5):2041-2055. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2087. Epub 2019 Apr 4.

Abstract

Treatment-free remission (TFR) by tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) discontinuation in patients with deep molecular response (DMR) is a paramount goal in the current chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) therapeutic strategy. The best DMR level by real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) for TKI discontinuation is still a matter of debate. To compare the accuracy of digital PCR (dPCR) and RT-qPCR for BCR-ABL1 transcript levels detection, 142 CML patients were monitored for a median time of 24 months. Digital PCR detected BCR-ABL1 transcripts in the RT-qPCR undetectable cases. The dPCR analysis of the samples, grouped by the MR classes, revealed a significant difference between MR and MR (P = 0.0104) or MR (P = 0.0032). The clinical and hematological characteristics of the patients grouped according to DMR classes (MR vs MR ) were superimposable. Conversely, patients with dPCR values <0.468 BCR-ABL1 copies/µL (as we previously described) showed a longer DMR duration (P = 0.0220) and mainly belonged to MR (P = 0.0442) classes compared to patients with higher dPCR values. Among the 142 patients, 111 (78%) discontinued the TKI treatment; among the 111 patients, 24 (22%) lost the MR or MR . RT-qPCR was not able to discriminate patients with higher risk of MR loss after discontinuation (P = 0.8100). On the contrary, according to dPCR, 12/25 (48%) patients with BCR-ABL1 values ≥0.468 and 12/86 (14%) patients with BCR-ABL1 values <0.468 lost DMR in this cohort, respectively (P = 0.0003). Treatment-free remission of patients who discontinued TKI with a dPCR <0.468 was significantly higher compared to patients with dPCR ≥ 0.468 (TFR at 2 years 83% vs 52% P = 0.0017, respectively). In conclusion, dPCR resulted in an improved recognition of stable DMR and of candidates to TKI discontinuation.

摘要

通过酪氨酸激酶抑制剂 (TKI) 停药实现无治疗缓解 (TFR) 是当前慢性髓性白血病 (CML) 治疗策略的首要目标。实时定量聚合酶链反应 (RT-qPCR) 下最佳的 DMR 水平仍存在争议。为了比较数字 PCR (dPCR) 和 RT-qPCR 检测 BCR-ABL1 转录本水平的准确性,对 142 例 CML 患者进行了中位时间为 24 个月的监测。dPCR 检测到 RT-qPCR 未检测到的 BCR-ABL1 转录本。根据 MR 类别对样本进行 dPCR 分析,MR 与 MR (P = 0.0104) 或 MR (P = 0.0032) 之间存在显著差异。根据 DMR 类别 (MR 与 MR ) 分组的患者的临床和血液学特征是可叠加的。相反,dPCR 值<0.468 BCR-ABL1 拷贝/µL 的患者 (如我们之前所述) 显示出更长的 DMR 持续时间 (P = 0.0220),并且主要属于 MR (P = 0.0442) 类别,与 dPCR 值较高的患者相比。在 142 例患者中,有 111 例 (78%) 停止了 TKI 治疗;在 111 例患者中,有 24 例 (22%) 失去了 MR 或 MR 。RT-qPCR 无法区分停药后 MR 丢失风险较高的患者 (P = 0.8100)。相反,根据 dPCR,在该队列中,25 例 BCR-ABL1 值≥0.468 的患者中有 12 例 (48%) 和 86 例 BCR-ABL1 值<0.468 的患者中有 12 例 (14%) 失去了 DMR (P = 0.0003)。dPCR<0.468 的患者停止 TKI 治疗的无治疗缓解率明显高于 dPCR≥0.468 的患者 (2 年 TFR 分别为 83%和 52%,P = 0.0017)。总之,dPCR 提高了对稳定 DMR 和 TKI 停药候选者的识别能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b17/6536984/b1ec9beb116f/CAM4-8-2041-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验