• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前列腺MRI在临床实践中的发展:多参数MRI和前列腺影像报告与数据系统v2报告的分阶段引入对肿瘤检测和分期与前列腺切除术的审计

Prostate MRI evolution in clinical practice: Audit of tumour detection and staging versus prostatectomy with staged introduction of multiparametric MRI and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v2 reporting.

作者信息

Raeside Mitchell, Low Andrew, Cohen Penelope, Sutherland Peter, Gormly Kirsten

机构信息

Dr Jones & Partners Medical Imaging, Eastwood, South Australia, Australia.

Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2019 Aug;63(4):487-494. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12878. Epub 2019 Apr 5.

DOI:10.1111/1754-9485.12878
PMID:30951248
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We conducted a retrospective audit to compare dominant nodule detection and local staging before and after the introduction of functional sequences and PI-RADS v2 reporting to MRI prostate scans in routine private practice.

METHODS

A retrospective audit was performed of 245 patients in four separate groups undergoing robotic prostatectomy for prostate cancer by a single urologist between 2009 and 2017. The initial 100 consecutive patients had T2 imaging only. The next 43 patients had T2 and DWI. 52 subsequent patients had T2, DWI and DCE sequences (mpMRI). A final 50 consecutive patients had mpMRI using PI-RADS v2 reporting. Preoperative MRI reports were compared with prostatectomy histopathology to determine the sensitivity of MRI in detecting dominant tumour nodule and T3 extension.

RESULTS

The addition of DWI and DCE sequences improved sensitivity for detection of dominant tumour nodule, with a significant further increase using PI-RADS v2 reporting (38% for T2 vs. 62% for T2/DWI vs. 67% for mpMRI vs 91% for PI-RADS v2). The accuracy of detecting T3 disease was initially very low. The use of additional imaging techniques did not significantly influence this, but the use of a three category likelihood of extraprostatic extension in the PI-RADS v2 group had a significant increase in detection of T3 disease (sensitivity 27% vs. 23% vs. 38% vs 63%).

CONCLUSION

This audit tracks the significant improvements in MRI detection of prostate cancer dominant tumour nodule and T3 extension in patients undergoing prostatectomy with changing techniques and reporting standards in routine clinical practice.

摘要

引言

我们进行了一项回顾性审计,以比较在常规私人诊所对前列腺MRI扫描引入功能序列和PI-RADS v2报告前后,主要结节的检测情况和局部分期。

方法

对2009年至2017年间由一名泌尿外科医生为四组不同的前列腺癌患者进行机器人前列腺切除术的245例患者进行回顾性审计。最初的100例连续患者仅进行了T2成像。接下来的43例患者进行了T2和DWI检查。随后的52例患者进行了T2、DWI和DCE序列(多参数MRI)检查。最后50例连续患者进行了使用PI-RADS v2报告的多参数MRI检查。将术前MRI报告与前列腺切除术后的组织病理学进行比较,以确定MRI检测主要肿瘤结节和T3期扩展的敏感性。

结果

添加DWI和DCE序列提高了检测主要肿瘤结节的敏感性,使用PI-RADS v2报告后有显著进一步提高(T2为38%,T2/DWI为62%,多参数MRI为67%,PI-RADS v2为91%)。检测T3期疾病的准确性最初非常低。使用额外的成像技术对此没有显著影响,但在PI-RADS v2组中使用前列腺外扩展的三类可能性显著提高了T3期疾病的检测率(敏感性分别为27%、23%、38%和63%)。

结论

这项审计追踪了在常规临床实践中,随着技术和报告标准的变化,接受前列腺切除术患者的前列腺癌主要肿瘤结节和T3期扩展的MRI检测的显著改善。

相似文献

1
Prostate MRI evolution in clinical practice: Audit of tumour detection and staging versus prostatectomy with staged introduction of multiparametric MRI and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v2 reporting.前列腺MRI在临床实践中的发展:多参数MRI和前列腺影像报告与数据系统v2报告的分阶段引入对肿瘤检测和分期与前列腺切除术的审计
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2019 Aug;63(4):487-494. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12878. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
2
Does the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 improve accuracy in reporting anterior lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)?前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)第 2 版是否能提高多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)报告前位病变的准确性?
Int Urol Nephrol. 2018 Jan;50(1):13-19. doi: 10.1007/s11255-017-1753-1. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
3
Comparison of Biparametric and Multiparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2.1.基于PI-RADS v2.1的双参数和多参数MRI在检测临床显著性前列腺癌中的比较
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Jan;53(1):283-291. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27283. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
4
Investigating the role of DCE-MRI, over T2 and DWI, in accurate PI-RADS v2 assessment of clinically significant peripheral zone prostate lesions as defined at radical prostatectomy.探讨 DCE-MRI 相对于 T2 和 DWI 在经根治性前列腺切除术定义的有临床意义的外周带前列腺病变的 PI-RADS v2 评估中的准确作用。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Apr;44(4):1520-1527. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1807-6.
5
Comparison of PI-RADS v1 and v2 for multiparametric MRI detection of prostate cancer with whole-mount histological workup as reference standard.PI-RADS v1 与 v2 对全组织切片病理检查作为参考标准的多参数 MRI 前列腺癌检测的比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2019 Jul;116:180-185. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 May 14.
6
Evaluation of the accuracy of multiparametric MRI for predicting prostate cancer pathology and tumour staging in the real world: an multicentre study.多参数 MRI 预测真实世界前列腺癌病理和肿瘤分期的准确性评估:一项多中心研究。
BJU Int. 2019 Aug;124(2):297-301. doi: 10.1111/bju.14696. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
7
Comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and PI-RADS version 2.1 for the detection of transition zone prostate cancer.PI-RADS 版本 2 与 PI-RADS 版本 2.1 对移行区前列腺癌检测的比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2019 Dec;121:108704. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108704. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
8
Accuracy of multiparametric MR imaging with PI-RADS V2 assessment in detecting infiltration of the neurovascular bundles prior to prostatectomy.多参数磁共振成像(PI-RADS V2 评估)在前列腺切除术前检测神经血管束浸润的准确性。
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Jan;98:187-192. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.11.019. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
9
Low PI-RADS assessment category excludes extraprostatic extension (≥pT3a) of prostate cancer: a histology-validated study including 301 operated patients.低 PI-RADS 评估类别排除前列腺癌的前列腺外延伸(≥pT3a):一项包括 301 例手术患者的组织学验证研究。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Oct;29(10):5478-5487. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06092-0. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
10
Assessment of PI-RADS v2 categories ≥ 3 for diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer.评估 PI-RADS v2 类别≥3 用于诊断临床显著前列腺癌。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Feb;44(2):705-712. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1751-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of preoperative PI-RADS assessment on pathological outcomes in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy.术前 PI-RADS 评估对接受根治性前列腺切除术患者病理结果的影响。
Cancer Imaging. 2023 Nov 26;23(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s40644-023-00619-x.
2
The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Primary Staging of Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature.磁共振成像和正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描在新诊断前列腺癌的分期中的作用:文献的系统评价。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Jun;4(3):370-395. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.11.002. Epub 2020 Dec 4.