Gomes Helena Henriques, Lourenço Inês, Ribeiro Joana, Martins Diana, Ribeiro Rita, Francisco Carla
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, Avenida Carlos Teixeira 514, Loures, Portugal.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019 Sep;48(7):509-514. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.04.001. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
Analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from maternal blood has showed a great potential as a screening method for fetal aneuploidies. cfDNA can be used as a first line screening tool or in a contingent model, after the combined test.
Prospective study of women attending for first trimester combined screening in our Hospital, in the first year of contingent cfDNA screening. According to the combined screening test result patients were divided in high-risk (offered invasive test or routine follow-up), intermediate-risk (counselled for cfDNA, invasive or routine follow-up) or low-risk (routine ultrasound follow-up). Pregnancy outcomes and performance of screening were evaluated. A cost-effectiveness analysis was also done.
The majority of the 1272 enrolled participants were Caucasian (82,6%), multiparous (51,7%) and the median maternal age was 30 years old. Thirty women screened high-risk and 83,3% of them opted for an invasive test. Forty-nine patients had an intermediate risk and 75,5% of them choose cfDNA testing. Our rate of invasive tests decreased from 3.5% to 2.4%.
The cut-offs used to determine high and intermediate-risk are based on a compromise between detection rate, pregnancy lost rate and cost. Above a determined cut-off in the intermediate-risk group, the cost for each additional detected trisomy case is very high. One major benefit of this contingent model was the decrease in invasive testing.
The contingent cfDNA screening model can be easily implemented in a public hospital with a low-risk population. Since cost/benefit is an important issue, further studies are needed to determine the ideal cut-off for our country.
对母血中游离DNA(cfDNA)的分析已显示出作为胎儿非整倍体筛查方法的巨大潜力。cfDNA可作为一线筛查工具,或在联合检测后用于应急模式。
在我院进行早期妊娠联合筛查的妇女的前瞻性研究,处于应急cfDNA筛查的第一年。根据联合筛查检测结果,将患者分为高危(提供侵入性检测或常规随访)、中危(接受cfDNA咨询、侵入性检测或常规随访)或低危(常规超声随访)。评估妊娠结局和筛查性能。还进行了成本效益分析。
1272名登记参与者中大多数为白种人(82.6%)、经产妇(51.7%),孕妇年龄中位数为30岁。30名妇女筛查为高危,其中83.3%选择了侵入性检测。49名患者为中危,其中75.5%选择了cfDNA检测。我们的侵入性检测率从3.5%降至2.4%。
用于确定高危和中危的临界值是基于检测率、妊娠丢失率和成本之间的折衷。在中危组中高于确定的临界值时,每多检测出一例三体病例的成本非常高。这种应急模式的一个主要好处是侵入性检测减少。
应急cfDNA筛查模式可在低风险人群的公立医院轻松实施。由于成本效益是一个重要问题,需要进一步研究以确定我国的理想临界值。