Griffith Christopher, Daigle Hugh
Hildebrand Department of Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Hildebrand Department of Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
J Colloid Interface Sci. 2019 Jul 1;547:117-126. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.03.048. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
Whereas hydrophobic colloidal particles are known to destabilize foams and emulsions stabilized with surfactants, their use for destabilizing Pickering emulsions is unexplored. Pickering emulsions differ from surfactant-stabilized emulsions because they are stabilized with colloidal particles that are adsorbed to the oil/water interface, which provide a steric barrier to droplet coalescence. This can make Pickering emulsions very stable, but it can also make their subsequent destabilization difficult. The hypothesis of this work is that destabilizing a Pickering emulsion should be possible with colloidal particles provided they are sufficiently hydrophobic, which will enable the particles to dewet an emulsion film and induce coalescence.
A model oil-in-water Pickering emulsion was stabilized with polyethylene glycol-modified silica nanoparticles and its stability was assessed by centrifugation and by stirring on a stir plate. Three different fumed silica particles, A200 (bare, hydrophilic), R816 (hexadecylsilane modified, intermediate hydrophobicity), and R805 (octadecylsilane modified, hydrophobic), were added to the emulsion and stirred to evaluate their ability to macroscopically induce coalescence. Optical microscopy was used to visualize the interaction between the model Pickering emulsion and the three different fumed silica particles.
The results from this work show there is a strong correlation between the wettability of a fumed silica particle and its ability to destabilize a model Pickering emulsion, with more hydrophobic particles showing a greater tendency to coalesce the Pickering emulsion. The hydrophilic and partially hydrophobic particles, at all concentrations tested, were unable coalesce the model Pickering emulsion. This was because the particles were almost immediately wetted by the continuous phase of the emulsion, which prevented any interactions between the emulsified oil drops and the silica particle surface. The hydrophobic fumed silica particles coalesced 60% of the emulsified oil with just 0.01 wt% added fumed silica, which further increased to 85% with 0.05 wt% added silica.
已知疏水性胶体颗粒会破坏由表面活性剂稳定的泡沫和乳液,但它们用于破坏皮克林乳液的情况尚未得到探索。皮克林乳液与表面活性剂稳定的乳液不同,因为它们是由吸附在油/水界面的胶体颗粒稳定的,这些颗粒为液滴聚结提供了空间位垒。这可以使皮克林乳液非常稳定,但也会使其随后的破坏变得困难。这项工作的假设是,只要胶体颗粒足够疏水,就有可能破坏皮克林乳液,这将使颗粒能够使乳液膜去湿并诱导聚结。
用聚乙二醇改性的二氧化硅纳米颗粒稳定了一种水包油型皮克林乳液模型,并通过离心和在搅拌板上搅拌来评估其稳定性。将三种不同的气相二氧化硅颗粒,A200(裸露的,亲水性)、R816(十六烷基硅烷改性,中等疏水性)和R805(十八烷基硅烷改性,疏水性)添加到乳液中并搅拌,以评估它们宏观诱导聚结的能力。用光学显微镜观察模型皮克林乳液与三种不同气相二氧化硅颗粒之间的相互作用。
这项工作的结果表明,气相二氧化硅颗粒的润湿性与其破坏模型皮克林乳液的能力之间存在很强的相关性,疏水性更强的颗粒使皮克林乳液聚结的趋势更大。在所有测试浓度下,亲水性和部分疏水性颗粒都无法使模型皮克林乳液聚结。这是因为颗粒几乎立即被乳液的连续相润湿了,这阻止了乳化油滴与二氧化硅颗粒表面之间的任何相互作用。疏水性气相二氧化硅颗粒仅添加0.01 wt%的气相二氧化硅就能使60%的乳化油聚结,添加0.05 wt%的二氧化硅时,这一比例进一步提高到85%。