School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, 212 Adriance Drive, College Station, TX 77843, United States; School of Public Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia; Communicable Disease Control Directorate, Department of Health Western Australia, 227 Stubbs Terrace, Shenton Park, WA 6008, Australia; Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines & Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, 15 Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, WA 6008, Australia.
Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, 792 Elizabeth Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.
Vaccine. 2019 May 1;37(19):2634-2641. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.027. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
We estimated the effectiveness of seasonal inactivated influenza vaccine and the potential influence of timing of immunization on vaccine effectiveness (VE) using data from the 2016 southern hemisphere influenza season.
Data were pooled from three routine syndromic sentinel surveillance systems in general practices in Australia. Each system routinely collected specimens for influenza testing from patients presenting with influenza-like illness. Next generation sequencing was used to characterize viruses. Using a test-negative design, VE was estimated based on the odds of vaccination among influenza-positive cases as compared to influenza-negative controls. Subgroup analyses were used to estimate VE by type, subtype and lineage, as well as age group and time between vaccination and symptom onset.
A total of 1085 patients tested for influenza in 2016 were included in the analysis, of whom 447 (41%) tested positive for influenza. The majority of detections were influenza A/H3N2 (74%). One-third (31%) of patients received the 2016 southern hemisphere formulation influenza vaccine. Overall, VE was estimated at 40% (95% CI: 18-56%). VE estimates were highest for patients immunized within two months prior to symptom onset (VE: 60%; 95% CI: 26-78%) and lowest for patients immunized >4 months prior to symptom onset (VE: 19%; 95% CI: -73-62%).
Overall, the 2016 influenza vaccine showed good protection against laboratory-confirmed infection among general practice patients. Results by duration of vaccination suggest a significant decline in effectiveness during the 2016 influenza season, indicating immunization close to influenza season offered optimal protection.
我们利用来自 2016 年南半球流感季节的三个常规综合征监测系统的数据,评估了季节性灭活流感疫苗的有效性,以及免疫接种时间对疫苗有效性(VE)的潜在影响。
数据来自澳大利亚常规诊所的三个常规综合征监测系统。每个系统都从出现流感样疾病的患者中常规收集流感检测样本。使用下一代测序来对病毒进行特征分析。采用病例对照研究,根据流感阳性病例与流感阴性对照相比的疫苗接种几率来估计 VE。使用亚组分析来估计不同类型、亚型和谱系以及年龄组和接种与症状发作之间的时间的 VE。
2016 年共有 1085 名患者接受了流感检测,其中 447 名(41%)检测出流感阳性。检测到的大多数病毒为甲型 H3N2(74%)。三分之一(31%)的患者接种了 2016 年南半球流感疫苗。总体而言,VE 估计为 40%(95%CI:18-56%)。VE 估计值在症状发作前两个月内接种疫苗的患者中最高(VE:60%;95%CI:26-78%),在症状发作前 4 个月以上接种疫苗的患者中最低(VE:19%;95%CI:-73-62%)。
总体而言,2016 年流感疫苗对普通诊所患者的实验室确诊感染显示出良好的保护作用。根据接种持续时间的结果表明,在 2016 年流感季节,有效性显著下降,表明在流感季节前接近接种可提供最佳保护。