• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复杂性轻度创伤性脑损伤患者的再次过度分诊:1447 例住院患者的观察性研究和社会经济学分析。

Secondary Overtriage in Patients with Complicated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: An Observational Study and Socioeconomic Analysis of 1447 Hospitalizations.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.

Division of Spine Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2020 Mar 1;86(3):374-382. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz092.

DOI:10.1093/neuros/nyz092
PMID:30953054
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Secondary overtriage is a problematic phenomenon because it creates unnecessary expense and potentially results in the mismanagement of healthcare resources. The rates of secondary overtriage among patients with complicated mild traumatic brain injury (cmTBI) are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the rate of secondary overtriage among patients with cmTBI using the institutional trauma registry.

METHODS

An observational study using retrospective analysis of 1447 hospitalizations including all consecutive patients with cmTBI between 2004 and 2013. Data on age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance status, GCS, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Trauma Injury Severity Score, transfer mode, overall length of stay (LOS), LOS within intensive care unit, and total charges were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, the rate of secondary overtriage among patients with cmTBI was 17.2%. These patients tended to be younger (median: 41 vs 60.5 yr; P < .001), have a lower ISS (9 vs 16; P < .001), and were more likely to be discharged home or leave against medical advice.

CONCLUSION

Our findings provide evidence to the growing body of literature suggesting that not all patients with cmTBI need to be transferred to a tertiary care center. In our study, these transfers ultimately incurred a total cost of $13 294 ($1337 transfer cost) per patient.

摘要

背景

二次过度分诊是一个有问题的现象,因为它会产生不必要的费用,并可能导致医疗资源管理不当。目前尚不清楚复杂轻度创伤性脑损伤(cmTBI)患者的二次过度分诊率。

目的

使用机构创伤登记处确定 cmTBI 患者的二次过度分诊率。

方法

一项观察性研究,对 2004 年至 2013 年间连续收治的所有 cmTBI 患者进行回顾性分析,共纳入 1447 例住院患者。收集并分析患者的年龄、性别、种族/民族、保险状况、GCS、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、创伤损伤严重程度评分、转院方式、总住院时间(LOS)、重症监护病房内 LOS 以及总费用。

结果

总体而言,cmTBI 患者的二次过度分诊率为 17.2%。这些患者的年龄更小(中位数:41 岁 vs 60.5 岁;P<0.001),ISS 更低(9 分 vs 16 分;P<0.001),更有可能出院或未经医嘱离院。

结论

我们的发现为越来越多的文献提供了证据,表明并非所有 cmTBI 患者都需要转至三级护理中心。在我们的研究中,这些转院最终使每位患者的总成本增加了 13294 美元(1337 美元的转院费用)。

相似文献

1
Secondary Overtriage in Patients with Complicated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: An Observational Study and Socioeconomic Analysis of 1447 Hospitalizations.复杂性轻度创伤性脑损伤患者的再次过度分诊:1447 例住院患者的观察性研究和社会经济学分析。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Mar 1;86(3):374-382. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz092.
2
Evaluation of Secondary Overtriage at a Rural Level 1 Trauma Center.农村一级创伤中心的二次过度分诊评估。
Am Surg. 2024 Sep;90(9):2244-2248. doi: 10.1177/00031348241262429. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
3
Factors influencing secondary overtriage in trauma patients undergoing interhospital transfer: A 10-year multi-center study in Hong Kong.影响创伤患者院内转院后再次过度分诊的因素:香港一项为期 10 年的多中心研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Dec;86:30-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.09.039. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
4
Secondary overtriage in pediatric trauma: can unnecessary patient transfers be avoided?小儿创伤中的二次过度分诊:能否避免不必要的患者转运?
J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Jun;50(6):1028-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.03.028. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
5
Are Pediatric Trauma Transfers Justified?: A Unique Viewpoint From a Transferring Institution.儿科创伤转院是否合理?——来自转院机构的独特观点。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2024 Aug 1;40(8):e111-e113. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003092. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
6
Secondary overtriage: the burden of unnecessary interfacility transfers in a rural trauma system.再次过度分诊:农村创伤体系中不必要的机构间转运负担。
JAMA Surg. 2013 Aug;148(8):763-8. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2132.
7
Resource utilization and secondary overtriage for patients with traumatic renal injuries in a regional trauma system.创伤性肾损伤患者在区域性创伤系统中的资源利用和二次过度分诊。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Jun 1;92(6):1061-1065. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003489. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
8
Risk factors for avoidable transfer to a pediatric trauma center among patients 2 years and older.2 岁及以上患者转至儿科创伤中心的可避免因素。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Jan;86(1):92-96. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002087.
9
Inter-facility transfers to an urban level 1 trauma center and rates of secondary overtriage.向城市一级创伤中心的机构间转运及二次过度分诊率。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Jan 24;51(1):48. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02741-2.
10
Secondary overtriage in a pediatric level one trauma center.儿科一级创伤中心的二次过度分类。
J Pediatr Surg. 2021 Dec;56(12):2337-2341. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.03.059. Epub 2021 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Teletrauma Use in US Emergency Departments.美国急诊科对远程创伤的应用。
JAMA Surg. 2024 Dec 1;159(12):1383-1391. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3758.
2
Outcomes of Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury Transferred to Trauma Centers.创伤性脑损伤患者转至创伤中心的结局。
JAMA Surg. 2024 Nov 1;159(11):1282-1288. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3254.
3
Factors associated with radiographic progression and neurologic decline in patients with isolated traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage.孤立性创伤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者影像学进展和神经功能衰退的相关因素。
Chin Neurosurg J. 2024 Aug 6;10(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s41016-024-00377-0.
4
Mapping the costs and socioeconomic characteristics involved in traumatic brain injuries: a scoping review.创伤性脑损伤相关成本及社会经济特征的绘制:范围综述。
J Rehabil Med. 2024 Aug 5;56:jrm18311. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v56.18311.
5
Emergency department observation of mild traumatic brain injury with minor radiographic findings: shorter stays, less expensive, and no increased risk compared to hospital admission.轻度创伤性脑损伤伴轻微影像学表现的急诊科观察:与住院相比,住院时间更短、费用更低且风险未增加。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Jun 17;1(4):609-617. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12124. eCollection 2020 Aug.