• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丙泊酚与巴比妥类药物用于控制难治性癫痫持续状态的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Systematic review and meta-analysis of propofol versus barbiturates for controlling refractory status epilepticus.

作者信息

Zhang Qing, Yu Yun, Lu Yu, Yue Hongli

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.119, Nansihuanxi Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China.

出版信息

BMC Neurol. 2019 Apr 6;19(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1281-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12883-019-1281-y
PMID:30954065
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6451279/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several studies have compared the efficacy and safety of propofol and barbiturates in the treatment of refractory status epilepticus (RSE). This study aims to quantitatively assess the advantages and disadvantages of propofol and barbiturates in controlling RSE.

METHODS

We searched for studies with relevant data from the PubMed, Embase, Ovid, Cochrane Library, Springer Link, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases. By calculating odds ratios and standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals, we assessed the disease control rate (DCR), case fatality rate (CFR), average control time (ACT), average tracheal intubation placement time (ATIPT), and incidence of hypotension between propofol and barbiturates in treating RSE.

RESULTS

Seven studies with 261 patients were included in this analysis. Meta-analysis revealed that the DCR of propofol was higher than that of barbiturates (p < 0.001) and that the CFR (p = 0.382) between the two treatment did not significantly differ in controlling RSE. Propofol shortened the ACT (p < 0.001) of RSE and reduced the ATIPT (p < 0.001) of patients with RSE more extensively than did barbiturates and did not increase the incidence of hypotension (p = 0.737).

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison with barbiturates, propofol can control RSE and shorten ATIPT in a more efficient and timely manner. Moreover, the drug does not increase the incidence of hypotension and CFR.

摘要

背景

多项研究比较了丙泊酚和巴比妥类药物治疗难治性癫痫持续状态(RSE)的疗效和安全性。本研究旨在定量评估丙泊酚和巴比妥类药物在控制RSE方面的优缺点。

方法

我们在PubMed、Embase、Ovid、Cochrane图书馆、Springer Link、Web of Science和中国知网数据库中搜索了有相关数据的研究。通过计算比值比和95%置信区间的标准化平均差,我们评估了丙泊酚和巴比妥类药物治疗RSE时的疾病控制率(DCR)、病死率(CFR)、平均控制时间(ACT)、平均气管插管放置时间(ATIPT)和低血压发生率。

结果

本分析纳入了7项研究中的261例患者。荟萃分析显示,丙泊酚的DCR高于巴比妥类药物(p < 0.001),且两种治疗方法在控制RSE方面的CFR(p = 0.382)无显著差异。与巴比妥类药物相比,丙泊酚更能缩短RSE的ACT(p < 0.001),更广泛地缩短RSE患者的ATIPT(p < 0.001),且不会增加低血压发生率(p = 0.737)。

结论

与巴比妥类药物相比,丙泊酚能更有效、及时地控制RSE并缩短ATIPT。此外,该药物不会增加低血压发生率和CFR。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b20/6451279/8b32d4441d45/12883_2019_1281_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b20/6451279/b2eaa249bf0f/12883_2019_1281_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b20/6451279/e49f4ef634c7/12883_2019_1281_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b20/6451279/470f5e577eda/12883_2019_1281_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b20/6451279/8bef836d9096/12883_2019_1281_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b20/6451279/0faa2cc0ccfb/12883_2019_1281_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b20/6451279/8b32d4441d45/12883_2019_1281_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b20/6451279/b2eaa249bf0f/12883_2019_1281_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b20/6451279/e49f4ef634c7/12883_2019_1281_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b20/6451279/470f5e577eda/12883_2019_1281_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b20/6451279/8bef836d9096/12883_2019_1281_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b20/6451279/0faa2cc0ccfb/12883_2019_1281_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b20/6451279/8b32d4441d45/12883_2019_1281_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis of propofol versus barbiturates for controlling refractory status epilepticus.丙泊酚与巴比妥类药物用于控制难治性癫痫持续状态的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Neurol. 2019 Apr 6;19(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1281-y.
2
Refractory status epilepticus.难治性癫痫持续状态。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2012 Apr;18(2):127-31. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32835132cc.
3
Treatment of refractory status epilepticus with propofol: clinical and pharmacokinetic findings.丙泊酚治疗难治性癫痫持续状态:临床及药代动力学研究结果
Epilepsia. 1998 Jan;39(1):18-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1998.tb01269.x.
4
Treatment of refractory status epilepticus with pentobarbital, propofol, or midazolam: a systematic review.使用戊巴比妥、丙泊酚或咪达唑仑治疗难治性癫痫持续状态:一项系统评价
Epilepsia. 2002 Feb;43(2):146-53. doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2002.28501.x.
5
Propofol treatment of refractory status epilepticus: a study of 31 episodes.丙泊酚治疗难治性癫痫持续状态:31例发作的研究
Epilepsia. 2004 Jul;45(7):757-63. doi: 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.01904.x.
6
Propofol versus thiopental sodium for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus.丙泊酚与硫喷妥钠治疗难治性癫痫持续状态的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 25(6):CD009202. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009202.pub3.
7
Propofol and barbiturates for the anesthesia of refractory convulsive status epilepticus: pros and cons.丙泊酚和巴比妥类药物用于难治性惊厥性癫痫持续状态的麻醉:利弊
Neurol Res. 2007 Oct;29(7):667-71. doi: 10.1179/016164107X240044.
8
Propofol versus thiopental sodium for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus.丙泊酚与硫喷妥钠治疗难治性癫痫持续状态的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15(8):CD009202. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009202.pub2.
9
A randomized trial for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus.一项治疗耐药性癫痫持续状态的随机试验。
Neurocrit Care. 2011 Feb;14(1):4-10. doi: 10.1007/s12028-010-9445-z.
10
Refractory status epilepticus: effect of treatment aggressiveness on prognosis.难治性癫痫持续状态:治疗积极性对预后的影响。
Arch Neurol. 2005 Nov;62(11):1698-702. doi: 10.1001/archneur.62.11.1698.

引用本文的文献

1
Guidance for: The acute management of status epilepticus in adult patients.适用于:成年患者癫痫持续状态的急性处理指南。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2025 May 8;26(2):249-262. doi: 10.1177/17511437251321338. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Incidence of local anesthetic systemic toxicity in patients receiving bupivacaine infiltration analgesia for total joint arthroplasty under general anesthesia: a retrospective single-center study.全身麻醉下接受布比卡因浸润镇痛的全关节置换术患者局部麻醉全身毒性的发生率:一项回顾性单中心研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Nov 21;24(1):422. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02816-y.
3
Comparative Electroencephalographic Profile of a New Anesthetic and Anticonvulsant That Is Selective for the GABA A R Slow Receptor Subtype.

本文引用的文献

1
A Study of Super Refractory Status Epilepticus from India.一项关于印度超难治性癫痫持续状态的研究。
Front Neurol. 2017 Nov 28;8:636. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00636. eCollection 2017.
2
Costs, length of stay, and mortality of super-refractory status epilepticus: A population-based study from Germany.超难治性癫痫持续状态的成本、住院时间和死亡率:来自德国的一项基于人群的研究。
Epilepsia. 2017 Sep;58(9):1533-1541. doi: 10.1111/epi.13837. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
3
Challenges in the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus.惊厥性癫痫持续状态的治疗挑战。
一种对GABA A R慢受体亚型具有选择性的新型麻醉药和抗惊厥药的比较脑电图特征。
Anesth Analg. 2024 Oct 4. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000007178.
4
The Acute Impact of Propofol on Blood-Brain Barrier Integrity in Mice.异丙酚对小鼠血脑屏障完整性的急性影响。
Pharm Res. 2024 Aug;41(8):1599-1611. doi: 10.1007/s11095-024-03735-w. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
5
Ketamine: Pro or antiepileptic agent? A systematic review.氯胺酮:是抗癫痫药还是促癫痫药?一项系统评价。
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 10;10(2):e24433. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24433. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.
6
Perioperative considerations for adult patients with Dravet syndrome in regional centres.成人 Dravet 综合征患者在区域中心的围手术期注意事项。
BMJ Case Rep. 2023 Dec 6;16(12):e256261. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2023-256261.
7
ACVIM Consensus Statement on the management of status epilepticus and cluster seizures in dogs and cats.ACVIM 共识声明:犬猫癫痫持续状态和簇发性发作的管理
J Vet Intern Med. 2024 Jan-Feb;38(1):19-40. doi: 10.1111/jvim.16928. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
8
Propofol-Related Infusion Syndrome in a Child With Refractory Status Epilepticus: Successful Resuscitation With Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation, Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy, and Therapeutic Plasma Exchange.一名难治性癫痫持续状态儿童的丙泊酚输注综合征:经静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合、连续性肾脏替代治疗及治疗性血浆置换成功复苏
Cureus. 2023 Oct 28;15(10):e47866. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47866. eCollection 2023 Oct.
9
Evidence-based guideline on management of status epilepticus in adult intensive care unit in resource-limited settings: a review article.资源有限环境下成人重症监护病房癫痫持续状态管理的循证指南:一篇综述文章
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Apr 17;85(6):2714-2720. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000625. eCollection 2023 Jun.
10
Propofol-Related Infusion Syndrome: A Clinical Review.丙泊酚输注综合征:临床综述
Cureus. 2022 Oct 17;14(10):e30383. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30383. eCollection 2022 Oct.
Seizure. 2017 Apr;47:17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2017.02.015. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
4
Costs and cost-driving factors for acute treatment of adults with status epilepticus: A multicenter cohort study from Germany.成人癫痫持续状态急性治疗的成本及成本驱动因素:一项来自德国的多中心队列研究。
Epilepsia. 2016 Dec;57(12):2056-2066. doi: 10.1111/epi.13584. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
5
Therapeutic coma for status epilepticus: Differing practices in a prospective multicenter study.癫痫持续状态的治疗性昏迷:一项前瞻性多中心研究中的不同做法。
Neurology. 2016 Oct 18;87(16):1650-1659. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003224. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
6
Propofol infusion syndrome: a structured review of experimental studies and 153 published case reports.丙泊酚输注综合征:对实验研究及153篇已发表病例报告的系统综述
Crit Care. 2015 Nov 12;19:398. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1112-5.
7
Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus.超难治性癫痫持续状态。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2015 Nov;15(11):74. doi: 10.1007/s11910-015-0594-5.
8
A definition and classification of status epilepticus--Report of the ILAE Task Force on Classification of Status Epilepticus.癫痫持续状态的定义和分类——国际抗癫痫联盟癫痫持续状态分类特别工作组的报告。
Epilepsia. 2015 Oct;56(10):1515-23. doi: 10.1111/epi.13121. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
9
Propofol versus thiopental sodium for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus.丙泊酚与硫喷妥钠治疗难治性癫痫持续状态的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 25(6):CD009202. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009202.pub3.
10
Anesthetic drugs in status epilepticus: risk or rescue? A 6-year cohort study.
Neurology. 2014 Aug 26;83(9):866. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000723.