Suppr超能文献

[轻度至中度哮喘吸入性类固醇哮喘管理的新方法]

[New approaches of inhaled steroid asthma management in mild to moderate asthma].

作者信息

Desjardin Amaury, Garcia Gilles

机构信息

CHU de Caen Normandie, service de pneumologie, 14000 Caen, France; CH de Lisieux, service de pneumologie, 14100 Lisieux, France.

Université Paris-Sud, faculté de médecine, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Centre chirurgical Marie-Lannelongue, Inserm U999, LabEx LERMIT, 92350 Le Plessis-Robinson, France; Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, hôpital universitaire de Bicêtre, DHU Thorax Innovation, centre de référence de l'hypertension pulmonaire sévère, service de pneumologie, 78, avenue du Général-Leclerc, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.

出版信息

Presse Med. 2019 Mar;48(3 Pt 1):293-302. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Apr 4.

Abstract

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the cornerstone of the management of asthma. Daily use allows to reduce mortality, intensity and frequency of exacerbations, to increase the control of symptoms of asthma and the quality of life of asthmatics patients and to reduce the decline of the lung function. A daily use of a weak dose of ICS allows to control the symptoms of asthma of the vast majority of mild to moderate asthmatics patients who account for about 75-80 % of the French asthmatic patients. An add-on strategy with a combination by ICS/LABA allows to decrease by 20 % the risk of an exacerbation compared with a treatment by CSI in monotherapy. "SMART" which consists in using a fixed ICS/LABA combination as a maintenance and reliever therapy had showed better results in the prevention of exacerbations that the use of the same combination associated with a SABA as a reliever therapy. This strategy is recommended by GINA at the same level of proof as the classical treatment. An "on-demand" use of a ICS/LABA combination according to symptoms is clearly less efficacious in terms of control of the symptoms than the classical strategy by ICS/LABA; but both strategies are identical in terms of prevention of exacerbations. The daily dose of ICS is 4 to 5 times less than in the daily ICS group. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a standard asthma self-management plan that advises patients to temporarily quadrupling the dose of ICS in case of asthma worsening can be an alternative and allow to reduce 20 % of clinically important asthma exacerbations.

摘要

吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)是哮喘管理的基石。每日使用可降低死亡率、加重发作的强度和频率,增强对哮喘症状的控制以及提高哮喘患者的生活质量,并减缓肺功能下降。每日使用低剂量ICS可控制绝大多数轻度至中度哮喘患者的哮喘症状,这类患者约占法国哮喘患者的75 - 80%。与ICS单药治疗相比,ICS/LABA联合的附加治疗策略可使加重发作风险降低20%。“SMART”方案,即使用固定的ICS/LABA联合制剂作为维持和缓解治疗,在预防加重发作方面比使用相同联合制剂并联合SABA作为缓解治疗的效果更好。在证据水平相同的情况下,GINA推荐这一策略与传统治疗相同。根据症状“按需”使用ICS/LABA联合制剂在控制症状方面明显不如ICS/LABA的传统策略有效;但在预防加重发作方面,两种策略效果相同。ICS的每日剂量比每日使用ICS组少4至5倍。一项标准哮喘自我管理计划建议患者在哮喘恶化时将ICS剂量临时增至四倍,其临床有效性和成本效益可作为一种替代方案,并可减少20%具有临床重要意义的哮喘加重发作。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验