J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Jul;119(7):1168-1175. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
Malnutrition affects up to 50% of hospitalized patients and contributes to adverse health and economic outcomes, but often remains unrecognized or undertreated.
This study assessed the utilization of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) and its association with the number of 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions of adult malnourished patients in comparison with the readmissions rates of their malnourished counterparts who did not receive ONS.
This was a retrospective cohort study.
PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: Of 153,161 inpatient encounters analyzed, a total of 8,713 (5.7%) malnourished adults admitted to an academic medical center hospital in the United States between October 1, 2016, and September 30, 2017 were included in the analyses. The study utilized records of patients at risk of malnutrition on admission and subsequently diagnosed as malnourished by a registered dietitian following established criteria.
ONS utilization rate, hospital length of stay (LOS), and 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions data were obtained from electronic medical records.
The associations between the number of 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions and ONS use were analyzed using mixed-effects negative binomial regression models, with coefficients and 95% CIs reported. Important covariates such as age, sex, and the severity of illness index were included in the regression models.
Only 3.1% of malnourished patients received ONS. ONS users had 38.8% fewer readmissions compared with non-ONS counterparts (P=0.017). The reduction in hospital readmissions by ONS was even greater for oncology patients (46.1%, P<0.001). A 50% reduction in time from hospital admission to ONS provision was associated with a 10.2% (P<0.01), 10.2% (P=0.014), and 16.6% (P<0.01) decrease in LOS for overall, oncology, and intensive care unit encounters, respectively.
In a large cohort of malnourished adult inpatient encounters, ONS provision rate was low, but when used, ONS intervention was associated with 38.8% fewer 30-day readmissions. This association was more pronounced for oncology encounters. Shorter LOS was observed when the interval between admission and ONS initiation was shorter. Reduced LOS and readmissions rates could result in financial benefits for health care systems prioritizing hospital nutrition care, in addition to informing significant medical benefits for their patients.
多达 50%的住院患者存在营养不良问题,并因此导致健康状况恶化和经济后果,但这种情况往往未得到识别或治疗不足。
本研究评估了口服营养补充剂(ONS)的使用情况,并比较了营养不良患者使用 ONS 与未使用 ONS 时的 30 天非计划性再入院率,以此评估其与 30 天非计划性再入院的相关性。
这是一项回顾性队列研究。
参与者/设置:在分析的 153161 例住院患者中,共有 8713 例(5.7%)美国学术医疗中心住院的营养不良成年人符合纳入标准,这些患者在入院时存在营养不良风险,随后经注册营养师根据既定标准诊断为营养不良。本研究使用了患者入院时的记录,并在患者营养不良后,从电子病历中获取了 ONS 使用率、住院时间(LOS)和 30 天非计划性再入院数据。
30 天非计划性再入院数据和 ONS 使用之间的相关性采用混合效应负二项回归模型进行分析,报告系数和 95%置信区间。在回归模型中纳入了年龄、性别和疾病严重程度指数等重要协变量。
仅 3.1%的营养不良患者使用了 ONS。与未使用 ONS 的患者相比,ONS 使用者的再入院率降低了 38.8%(P=0.017)。ONS 对肿瘤患者的再入院减少作用更大(46.1%,P<0.001)。ONS 从入院到开始使用的时间每减少 50%,则 LOS 分别减少 10.2%(P<0.01)、10.2%(P=0.014)和 16.6%(P<0.01),总体而言、肿瘤学和重症监护病房的 LOS 分别减少 10.2%、10.2%和 16.6%。
在一项大型营养不良成年住院患者队列研究中,ONS 的使用率较低,但ONS 干预与 30 天再入院率降低 38.8%相关。该相关性在肿瘤学患者中更为明显。入院和开始使用 ONS 之间的间隔时间越短,LOS 越短。对于优先考虑医院营养护理的医疗保健系统而言,降低 LOS 和再入院率可带来经济效益,同时也可为患者带来显著的医疗效益。