Suppr超能文献

急诊拥挤对危重症患者肺保护性通气应用的影响。

The effect of emergency department crowding on lung-protective ventilation utilization for critically ill patients.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States; Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.

Department of Emergency Medicine, St. David's South Austin Medical Center, Austin, TX, United States.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2019 Aug;52:40-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.03.008. Epub 2019 Mar 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To measure effects of ED crowding on lung-protective ventilation (LPV) utilization in critically ill ED patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of adult mechanically ventilated ED patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit (MICU), over a 3.5-year period at a single academic tertiary care hospital. Clinical data, including reason for intubation, severity of illness (MPM-III), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) risk score (EDLIPS), and ventilator settings were extracted via electronic query of electronic health record and standardized chart abstraction. Crowding metrics were obtained at 5-min intervals and averaged over the ED stay, stratified by acuity and disposition. Multivariate logistic regression was used to predict likelihood of LPV prior to ED departure.

RESULTS

Mechanical ventilation was used in 446 patients for a median ED duration of 3.7 h (interquartile ratio, IQR, 2.3, 5.6). Mean MPM-III score was 32.5 ± 22.7, with high risk for ARDS (EDLIPS ≥5) seen in 373 (82%) patients. Initial and final ED ventilator settings differed in 134 (30.0%) patients, of which only 47 (35.1%) involved tidal volume changes. Higher percentages of active ED patients (workup in-progress) and those requiring eventual admission were associated with lower odds of LPV utilization by ED departure (OR 0.97, 95%CI 0.94-1.00; OR 0.97, 95%CI 0.94-1.00, respectively). In periods of high volume, ventilator adjustments to settings other than the tidal volume were associated with higher odds of LPV utilization. Reason for intubation, MPM-III, and EDLIPS were not associated with LPV utilization, with no interactions detected in times of crowding.

CONCLUSIONS

ED patients remain on suboptimal tidal volume settings with infrequent ventilator adjustments during the ED stay. Hospitals should focus on both systemic factors and bedside physician and/or respiratory therapist interventions to increase LPV utilization in times of ED boarding and crowding for all patients.

摘要

目的

测量急诊拥挤对危重症患者肺保护性通气(LPV)应用的影响。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了在一家学术性三级护理医院的重症监护病房(MICU)接受机械通气的成年急诊患者,研究时间为 3.5 年。通过电子查询电子病历和标准化图表提取临床数据,包括插管原因、疾病严重程度(MPM-III)、急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)风险评分(EDLIPS)和呼吸机设置。在 ED 停留期间,每隔 5 分钟获得拥挤度指标,并进行平均分层,根据急性病程度和处置情况进行分层。使用多变量逻辑回归来预测 ED 离开前 LPV 的可能性。

结果

446 例患者接受机械通气,中位 ED 持续时间为 3.7 小时(四分位距 IQR,2.3,5.6)。平均 MPM-III 评分为 32.5±22.7,ARDS 高危(EDLIPS≥5)患者为 373 例(82%)。134 例(30.0%)患者初始和最终 ED 呼吸机设置不同,其中仅 47 例(35.1%)涉及潮气量变化。活动中的 ED 患者(正在进行检查)和需要最终入院的患者比例较高与 ED 离开时 LPV 使用率降低相关(OR 0.97,95%CI 0.94-1.00;OR 0.97,95%CI 0.94-1.00,分别)。在高容量期,除潮气量以外的呼吸机设置调整与 LPV 使用率增加相关。插管原因、MPM-III 和 EDLIPS 与 LPV 使用率无关,在拥挤时期未检测到相互作用。

结论

在 ED 停留期间,ED 患者仍处于不理想的潮气量设置,呼吸机调整频率较低。医院应关注系统因素和床边医生和/或呼吸治疗师的干预措施,以增加所有患者在 ED 住院和拥挤时 LPV 的使用率。

相似文献

1
The effect of emergency department crowding on lung-protective ventilation utilization for critically ill patients.
J Crit Care. 2019 Aug;52:40-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.03.008. Epub 2019 Mar 23.
2
Initial mechanical ventilator settings and lung protective ventilation in the ED.
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Aug;34(8):1446-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.04.027. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
6
Prehospital tidal volume influences hospital tidal volume: A cohort study.
J Crit Care. 2015 Jun;30(3):495-501. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.02.013. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
7
Duration of Mechanical Ventilation in the Emergency Department.
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;18(5):972-979. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.5.34099. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
9
Emergency Department Length of Stay for Critical Care Admissions. A Population-based Study.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Aug;13(8):1324-32. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201511-773OC.
10
Ventilator settings as a risk factor for acute respiratory distress syndrome in mechanically ventilated patients.
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Jul;31(7):922-6. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2625-1. Epub 2005 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergency department crowding: a national data report.
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2024 Dec;11(4):331-334. doi: 10.15441/ceem.24.337. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
2
Noninvasive respiratory support in the emergency department: Controversies and state-of-the-art recommendations.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2024 Mar 7;5(2):e13118. doi: 10.1002/emp2.13118. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Disparities Exist in the Application of Low Tidal-volume Ventilation in the Emergency Department.
West J Emerg Med. 2023 Apr 26;24(3):502-510. doi: 10.5811/westjem.59291.
4
Predictors of Respiratory Support Use in Emergency Department Patients With COVID-19-Related Respiratory Failure.
Respir Care. 2022 Sep;67(9):1091-1099. doi: 10.4187/respcare.09772. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
6
Initiation of a Lung Protective Ventilation Strategy in the Emergency Department: Does an Emergency Department-Based ICU Make a Difference?
Crit Care Explor. 2022 Feb 8;4(2):e0632. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000632. eCollection 2022 Feb.
7
8
Central Venous Catheter Adverse Events Are not Associated with Crowding Indicators.
West J Emerg Med. 2021 Jan 20;22(2):427-434. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.10.48279.
9
Emergency Department Management of Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in Adults With COVID-19.
J Emerg Med. 2021 Jun;60(6):729-742. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.12.014. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
10
Predictors of Delayed Recognition of Critical Illness in Emergency Department Patients and Its Effect on Morbidity and Mortality.
J Intensive Care Med. 2022 Jan;37(1):52-59. doi: 10.1177/0885066620967901. Epub 2020 Oct 29.

本文引用的文献

3
Emergency Department Blood Gas Utilization and Changes in Ventilator Settings.
Respir Care. 2018 Jan;63(1):36-42. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05590. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
4
Duration of Mechanical Ventilation in the Emergency Department.
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;18(5):972-979. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.5.34099. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
7
Lung-Protective Ventilation Initiated in the Emergency Department (LOV-ED): A Quasi-Experimental, Before-After Trial.
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;70(3):406-418.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.01.013. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
8
The impact of ED crowding on early interventions and mortality in patients with severe sepsis.
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Jul;35(7):953-960. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.01.061. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
10
Door-to-Imaging Time for Acute Stroke Patients Is Adversely Affected by Emergency Department Crowding.
Stroke. 2017 Jan;48(1):49-54. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015131. Epub 2016 Nov 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验