Suppr超能文献

不同来源间充质干细胞的共培养提高成熟兔骨软骨缺损的再生能力:一项体内研究。

Coculturing of mesenchymal stem cells of different sources improved regenerative capability of osteochondral defect in the mature rabbit: An in vivo study.

作者信息

Mahmoud Elhussein Elbadry, Adachi Nobuo, Mawas Amany Sayed, Gaarour Osama Samir, Ochi Mitsuo

机构信息

1 Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt.

2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Integrated Health Sciences, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019 May-Aug;27(2):2309499019839850. doi: 10.1177/2309499019839850.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Choosing a therapeutic cell source for osteochondral repair remains a challenge. The present study investigated coculturing mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from different sources to provide an improved therapeutic cell option for osteochondral repair.

METHODS

Dutch and Japanese white rabbits were used in this study, the first for isolating MSCs and the second for creating an osteochondral model in the medial femoral condyle. The 26 rabbit knees were divided randomly into four groups: control ( n = 6), bone marrow-derived MSCs (BMSCs) ( n = 7), synovial tissue MSCs (SMSCs) ( n = 7), and cocultured MSCs ( n = 6). Tissue repair was assessed using the Fortier scale, and colony-forming assay was performed.

RESULTS

At different cell densities, cocultured and SMSCs formed larger colonies than BMSCs, indicating their high proliferative potential. After 2 months, complete filling of the defect with smooth surface regularity was detected in the cocultured MSC group, although there was no significant difference among the therapeutic groups macroscopically. Also, tissue repair was histologically better in the cocultured MSC group than in the control and SMSC groups, due to repair of the subchondral bone and coverage with hyaline cartilage. Additionally, toluidine blue and collagen-II staining intensity in the repaired tissue was better in the cocultured MSC group than in the remaining groups.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that cocultured MSCs are a suitable option for the regeneration capability of osteochondral defects due to their enhanced osteochondrogenic potential.

摘要

目的

选择用于骨软骨修复的治疗性细胞来源仍然是一项挑战。本研究调查了不同来源间充质干细胞(MSCs)的共培养,以为骨软骨修复提供更好的治疗性细胞选择。

方法

本研究使用了荷兰白兔和日本白兔,前者用于分离MSCs,后者用于在股骨内侧髁创建骨软骨模型。26个兔膝关节被随机分为四组:对照组(n = 6)、骨髓来源的MSCs(BMSCs)组(n = 7)、滑膜组织MSCs(SMSCs)组(n = 7)和共培养MSCs组(n = 6)。使用Fortier评分评估组织修复情况,并进行集落形成试验。

结果

在不同细胞密度下,共培养的MSCs和SMSCs形成的集落比BMSCs更大,表明它们具有较高的增殖潜力。2个月后,共培养MSCs组缺损完全填充,表面规则光滑,尽管各治疗组在宏观上无显著差异。此外,共培养MSCs组的组织修复在组织学上优于对照组和SMSCs组,原因是软骨下骨得到修复并被透明软骨覆盖。此外,共培养MSCs组修复组织中的甲苯胺蓝和Ⅱ型胶原染色强度优于其他组。

结论

我们的结果表明,共培养的MSCs由于其增强的骨软骨生成潜力,是骨软骨缺损再生能力的合适选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验