Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse et Transplantation Rénale, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France; CESP, INSERM, Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Service de Néphrologie et Transplantation d'organe, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France.
Kidney Int. 2019 Jun;95(6):1471-1485. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.12.029. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatching and minimization of immunosuppression are two major risk factors for the development of de novo donor-specific antibodies, which are associated with reduced kidney graft survival. Antibodies do not recognize whole HLA antigens but rather individual epitopes, which are short sequences of amino acids in accessible positions. However, compatibility is still assessed by the simple count of mismatched HLA antigens. We hypothesized that the number of mismatched epitopes, or ("epitope load") would identify patients at the highest risk of developing donor specific antibodies following minimization of immunosuppression. We determined epitope load in 89 clinical trial participants who converted from cyclosporine to everolimus 3 months after kidney transplantation. Twenty-nine participants (32.6%) developed de novo donor specific antibodies. Compared to the number of HLA mismatches, epitope load was more strongly associated with the development of donor specific antibodies. Participants with an epitope load greater than 27 had a 12-fold relative risk of developing donor-specific antibodies compared to those with an epitope load below that threshold. Using that threshold, epitope load would have missed only one participant who subsequently developed donor specific antibodies, compared to 8 missed cases based on a 6-antigen mismatch. DQ7 was the most frequent antigenic target of donor specific antibodies in our population, and some DQ7 epitopes appeared to be more frequently involved than others. Assessing epitope load before minimizing immunosuppression may be a more efficient tool to identify patients at the highest risk of allosensitization.
人类白细胞抗原 (HLA) 不匹配和免疫抑制最小化是产生新的供体特异性抗体的两个主要危险因素,这与降低肾移植物存活率有关。抗体并不识别整个 HLA 抗原,而是识别单个表位,即可及位置的短氨基酸序列。然而,相容性仍然通过不匹配 HLA 抗原的简单计数来评估。我们假设,不匹配表位的数量或(“表位负荷”)将确定在免疫抑制最小化后产生供体特异性抗体风险最高的患者。我们在 89 名接受环孢素转换为依维莫司治疗的临床试验参与者中确定了表位负荷,这些参与者在肾移植后 3 个月转为依维莫司。29 名参与者(32.6%)产生了新的供体特异性抗体。与 HLA 不匹配数量相比,表位负荷与供体特异性抗体的产生相关性更强。与表位负荷低于该阈值的参与者相比,表位负荷大于 27 的参与者产生供体特异性抗体的相对风险增加了 12 倍。使用该阈值,与基于 6 个抗原不匹配的情况相比,只有一个随后产生供体特异性抗体的参与者被漏诊,而不是基于表位负荷的情况漏诊 8 个病例。在我们的人群中,DQ7 是供体特异性抗体的最常见抗原靶标,并且一些 DQ7 表位似乎比其他表位更频繁地涉及。在最小化免疫抑制之前评估表位负荷可能是识别同种致敏风险最高的患者的更有效工具。