Ivlevs Artjoms, Nikolova Milena, Graham Carol
1Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol, BS16 1QY UK.
2IZA, Bonn, Germany.
J Popul Econ. 2019;32(1):113-151. doi: 10.1007/s00148-018-0718-8. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
We offer the first global perspective on the well-being consequences of emigration for those staying behind using several subjective well-being measures (evaluations of best possible life, positive affect, stress, and depression). Using the Gallup World Poll data for 114 countries during 2009-2011, we find that having family members abroad is associated with greater evaluative well-being and positive affect, and receiving remittances is linked with further increases in evaluative well-being, especially in poorer contexts-both across and within countries. We also document that having household members abroad is linked with increased stress and depression, which are not offset by remittances. The out-migration of family members appears less traumatic in countries where migration is more common, indicating that people in such contexts might be able to cope better with separation. Overall, subjective well-being measures, which reflect both material and non-material aspects of life, furnish additional insights and a well-rounded picture of the consequences of emigration on migrant family members staying behind relative to standard outcomes employed in the literature, such as the left-behind's consumption, income, or labor market outcomes.
我们首次从全球视角出发,运用多种主观幸福感衡量指标(对最佳可能生活的评价、积极情绪、压力和抑郁),探讨了家庭成员移民对留守者幸福感的影响。利用2009年至2011年期间114个国家的盖洛普世界民意调查数据,我们发现,家庭成员在国外与更高的评价性幸福感和积极情绪相关联,而收到汇款则与评价性幸福感的进一步提升有关,尤其是在较贫穷的环境中——无论是在不同国家之间还是在一个国家内部。我们还记录到,家庭成员在国外与压力和抑郁的增加有关,而汇款并不能抵消这些影响。在移民更为普遍的国家,家庭成员的外出移民似乎造成的创伤较小,这表明在这种环境下的人们可能能够更好地应对分离。总体而言,反映生活物质和非物质方面的主观幸福感衡量指标,相对于文献中使用的标准结果,如留守者的消费、收入或劳动力市场结果,为移民对留守家庭成员的影响提供了额外的见解和全面的图景。