Walsh Kieran
BMJ LearningLondonUK.
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2019 Jan 7;32(1):58-60. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2018.1521189. eCollection 2019 Jan.
Online clinical decision support has been shown to help physicians improve the quality of care that they provide. However, there is little evidence as to how individual physicians perceive the utility of clinical decision support considering its cost. This article evaluates the perceptions of physicians who are part of a user group at BMJ about the cost and utility of an online clinical decision support resource, BMJ Best Practice. These physicians saw value in being able to link their usage of online clinical decision support to improved clinical practice. The evidence-based credentials, convenience, and time efficiency of the online clinical decision support were the most valued features. Users also valued the fact that the content was continually updated. Most thought that their institution should pay but were willing to use their personal devices to access the content. Physicians also valued being able to claim continuing professional development credits for their use of the resource.
在线临床决策支持已被证明有助于医生提高他们提供的医疗服务质量。然而，关于个体医生如何看待临床决策支持的效用及其成本，几乎没有相关证据。本文评估了英国医学杂志（BMJ）用户群体中的医生对在线临床决策支持资源BMJ最佳实践的成本和效用的看法。这些医生认为能够将他们对在线临床决策支持的使用与改善临床实践联系起来是有价值的。在线临床决策支持的循证资质、便利性和时间效率是最受重视的特征。用户还重视其内容不断更新这一事实。大多数人认为他们的机构应该付费，但愿意使用个人设备访问该内容。医生们也重视能够因使用该资源而获得继续职业发展学分。
