Kopel Jonathan J, Phy Michael
Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences CenterLubbockTexas.
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2019 Jan 24;32(1):159-162. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2018.1533311. eCollection 2019 Jan.
Since 2003, duty hour regulations (DHRs) imposed by the Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) have been a controversial issue in the medical community. The conflict touches upon the ethical principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, justice, and the activities of every physician. However, the controversy concerning DHR presents opportunities for reevaluating a physician's roles, responsibilities, and work-life balance in the 21st century. In this article, the DHR controversy is discussed through the thoughts and ideas of Sir William Osler using an interview format. An internal medicine residency program director adds comments to this discussion based on his understanding of current ACGME regulations.
自2003年以来,研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)实施的工作时间规定(DHRs)一直是医学界备受争议的问题。这一冲突涉及到行善、不伤害、公正等伦理原则以及每位医生的工作。然而,关于工作时间规定的争议为重新审视21世纪医生的角色、责任和工作与生活的平衡提供了契机。在本文中,我们采用访谈形式,通过威廉·奥斯勒爵士的思想和观点来探讨工作时间规定的争议。一位内科住院医师培训项目主任基于他对当前ACGME规定的理解,对这一讨论发表了评论。