• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《国王间质性肺病(KBILD)问卷》:更新的最小临床重要差异。

The King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease (KBILD) questionnaire: an updated minimal clinically important difference.

机构信息

Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, School of Basic and Medical Biosciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.

Department of Respiratory Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open Respir Res. 2019 Feb 18;6(1):e000363. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2018-000363. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1136/bmjresp-2018-000363
PMID:30956799
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6424243/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease (KBILD) is a 15-item validated health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaire. The method of scoring the KBILD has recently changed to incorporate a logit-scale transformation from one that used raw item responses, as this is potentially a more linear scale. The aim of this study was to re-evaluate the KBILD minimal clinically important difference (MCID) using the new logit -transformed scoring.

METHODS

57 patients with interstitial lung disease (17 idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, IPF) were asked to complete the KBILD questionnaire on two occasions in outpatient clinics. At the second visit, patients also completed a 15-item global rating of change of health status questionnaire (GRCQ). The MCID was calculated as the mean of four different methods: the change in KBILD for patients indicating a small change in GRCQ, patients with a 7%-12% change in FVC, 1 SE of measurement of baseline KBILD and effect size (ES) of 0.3.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) KBILD total score for all patients was 55.3 (15.6). 16 patients underwent a therapeutic intervention. 36 patients reported a change in their condition on the GRCQ; 22 deteriorated, 14 improved and 21 were unchanged. There was a significant change in KBILD total score in patients reporting a change in GRCQ; mean (SD) 57.0 (13.6) versus 50.0 (9.7); mean difference 7.0; 95% CI of difference 3.0 to 11.0; p<0.01. The change in KBILD total score correlated with the GRCQ scale; r=-0.49, p<0.01. The mean KBILD total score MCID was 5. The MCID of KBILD domains were 6 for Psychological, 7 for Breathlessness and Activities, and 11 for Chest Symptoms.

CONCLUSION

The KBILD is a responsive tool for longitudinal assessment of HRQOL in patients with ILD. The MCID of the KBILD total score is a 5-unit change.

摘要

简介

金氏简要间质性肺病(KBILD)是一个包含 15 个项目的经过验证的健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)问卷。最近,KBILD 的评分方法发生了变化,采用了对数尺度转换,而不是以前使用的原始项目反应,因为这是一种更线性的尺度。本研究的目的是使用新的对数转换评分重新评估 KBILD 的最小临床重要差异(MCID)。

方法

57 名间质性肺病(ILD)患者(17 名特发性肺纤维化,IPF)在门诊接受了两次 KBILD 问卷调查。在第二次就诊时,患者还完成了一份 15 项健康状况总体变化全球评分问卷(GRCQ)。MCID 是通过四种不同方法的平均值计算得出的:GRCQ 显示健康状况小变化的患者的 KBILD 变化,FVC 变化 7%-12%的患者,基线 KBILD 的 1 SE 测量值和效应量(ES)为 0.3。

结果

所有患者的 KBILD 总分平均值(标准差)为 55.3(15.6)。16 名患者接受了治疗干预。36 名患者报告了 GRCQ 中的病情变化;22 名恶化,14 名改善,21 名不变。报告 GRCQ 变化的患者的 KBILD 总分有显著变化;平均值(标准差)为 57.0(13.6)与 50.0(9.7);平均差异 7.0;95%置信区间差值为 3.0 至 11.0;p<0.01。KBILD 总分的变化与 GRCQ 量表相关;r=-0.49,p<0.01。KBILD 总分的 MCID 平均值为 5。KBILD 各领域的 MCID 分别为心理领域 6,呼吸困难和活动领域 7,胸部症状领域 11。

结论

KBILD 是一种用于评估ILD 患者 HRQOL 的纵向反应工具。KBILD 总分的 MCID 是 5 个单位的变化。

相似文献

1
The King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease (KBILD) questionnaire: an updated minimal clinically important difference.《国王间质性肺病(KBILD)问卷》:更新的最小临床重要差异。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2019 Feb 18;6(1):e000363. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2018-000363. eCollection 2019.
2
King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire: responsiveness and minimum clinically important difference.金氏间质性肺病问卷:反应性和最小临床重要差异。
Eur Respir J. 2019 Sep 5;54(3). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00281-2019. Print 2019 Sep.
3
The minimal important difference of the King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease Questionnaire (K-BILD) and forced vital capacity in interstitial lung disease.特发性肺纤维化患者中 King 简短间质性肺病问卷(K-BILD)与用力肺活量的最小有意义差异。
Respir Med. 2013 Sep;107(9):1438-43. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.06.009. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
4
Rasch analysis and impact factor methods both yield valid and comparable measures of health status in interstitial lung disease.拉斯克分析和影响因子方法都能在间质性肺病中产生有效且可比的健康状况衡量标准。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Sep;68(9):1019-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.03.021. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
5
Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of SGRQ-I and K-BILD in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.SGRQ-I 和 K-BILD 在特发性肺纤维化中的反应性和最小临床重要差异。
Respir Res. 2020 Apr 21;21(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01359-3.
6
Validation of a Dyspnea Visual Analog Scale in Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease.纤维化间质性肺病呼吸困难视觉模拟量表的验证。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2024 Jul;21(7):1007-1014. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202307-658OC.
7
Health-related quality of life and health state utility value in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.特发性肺纤维化患者的健康相关生活质量和健康状态效用值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Jan 5;23(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02326-y.
8
Rituximab versus intravenous cyclophosphamide in patients with connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease in the UK (RECITAL): a double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, controlled, phase 2b trial.利妥昔单抗与静脉注射环磷酰胺治疗英国结缔组织病相关间质性肺病患者(RECITAL):一项双盲、双模拟、随机、对照、2b 期试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2023 Jan;11(1):45-54. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00359-9. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
9
The psychometric properties of the King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire and thresholds for meaningful treatment response in patients with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases.《King's 简要间质性肺病问卷的心理测量特性及其在进行性纤维化间质性肺病患者中治疗反应有意义的阈值》
Eur Respir J. 2022 Jun 2;59(6). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01790-2021. Print 2022 Jun.
10
Patient-reported outcomes to assess dyspnoea in interstitial lung disease and pulmonary hypertension: a systematic literature review of measurement properties.评估间质性肺疾病和肺动脉高压患者呼吸困难的患者报告结局:测量特性的系统文献回顾。
Eur Respir Rev. 2022 Dec 21;31(166). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0091-2022. Print 2022 Dec 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Health-related quality of life measured with K-BILD is associated with survival in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.采用 K-BILD 测定的健康相关生活质量与特发性肺纤维化患者的生存相关。
BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Sep 30;24(1):480. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-03303-3.
2
Real-World Clinical Profile and Safety of Nintedanib in Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Subgroup Analysis of Interstitial Lung Disease Data From an Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) Specialty Clinic in India.尼达尼布在系统性硬化症相关间质性肺疾病中的真实世界临床特征与安全性:来自印度一家间质性肺疾病(ILD)专科诊所的间质性肺疾病数据亚组分析
Cureus. 2024 Jul 28;16(7):e65579. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65579. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Antifibrotics in the Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: Prospective Real-World Experience From an Interstitial Lung Disease Clinic in India.抗纤维化药物在类风湿关节炎相关间质性肺疾病管理中的应用:来自印度一家间质性肺疾病诊所的前瞻性真实世界经验
Cureus. 2024 Jun 30;16(6):e63518. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63518. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Pulmonary Fibrosis Stakeholder Summit: A Joint NHLBI, Three Lakes Foundation, and Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Workshop Report.肺纤维化利益相关者峰会:NHLBI、三湖基金会和肺纤维化基金会联合研讨会报告。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Feb 15;209(4):362-373. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202307-1154WS.
5
Clinical Impact of Physical Activity and Cough on Disease Progression in Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease.体力活动和咳嗽对纤维化间质性肺疾病疾病进展的临床影响
J Clin Med. 2023 May 31;12(11):3787. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113787.
6
Design and rationale for the prospective treatment efficacy in IPF using genotype for NAC selection (PRECISIONS) clinical trial.采用基因型选择 NAC 治疗特发性肺纤维化的前瞻性疗效研究(PRECISIONS)的设计和原理。
BMC Pulm Med. 2022 Dec 13;22(1):475. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-02281-8.
7
Efficacy and safety of Treamid in the rehabilitation of patients after COVID-19 pneumonia: a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.特瑞米德在 COVID-19 肺炎患者康复中的疗效和安全性:一项 2 期、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
J Transl Med. 2022 Nov 3;20(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03660-9.
8
Palliative Care Early in the Care Continuum among Patients with Serious Respiratory Illness: An Official ATS/AAHPM/HPNA/SWHPN Policy Statement.严重呼吸系统疾病患者的照护延续链中的舒缓医疗:美国胸科学会/美国临终关怀与姑息医学学会/美国护士麻醉师协会/世界卫生组织姑息治疗联盟政策声明。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Sep 15;206(6):e44-e69. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202207-1262ST.
9
Inspiratory muscle training enhances recovery post-COVID-19: a randomised controlled trial.吸气肌训练促进 COVID-19 后康复:一项随机对照试验。
Eur Respir J. 2022 Oct 6;60(4). doi: 10.1183/13993003.03101-2021. Print 2022 Oct.
10
Health Related Quality of Life in Interstitial Lung Disease: Can We Use the Same Concepts Around the World?间质性肺疾病的健康相关生活质量:我们能在全球使用相同的概念吗?
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Oct 6;8:745908. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.745908. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Common measure of quality of life for people with systemic sclerosis across seven European countries: a cross-sectional study.跨七个欧洲国家的系统性硬化症患者生活质量的常用衡量标准:一项横断面研究。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Jul;77(7):1032-1038. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212412. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
2
Validity, responsiveness and minimum clinically important difference of the incremental shuttle walk in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a prospective study.特发性肺纤维化中递增往返步行试验的效度、反应度及最小临床重要差异:一项前瞻性研究
Thorax. 2017 Sep 7. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-210589.
3
Ambulatory oxygen in fibrotic lung disease (AmbOx): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.纤维化肺病患者的门诊吸氧(AmbOx):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Apr 28;18(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1912-9.
4
Rasch Analysis for Instrument Development: Why, When, and How?用于工具开发的拉施分析:为何、何时以及如何进行?
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Winter;15(4). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-04-0148.
5
Rasch analysis and impact factor methods both yield valid and comparable measures of health status in interstitial lung disease.拉斯克分析和影响因子方法都能在间质性肺病中产生有效且可比的健康状况衡量标准。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Sep;68(9):1019-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.03.021. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
6
The minimal important difference of the King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease Questionnaire (K-BILD) and forced vital capacity in interstitial lung disease.特发性肺纤维化患者中 King 简短间质性肺病问卷(K-BILD)与用力肺活量的最小有意义差异。
Respir Med. 2013 Sep;107(9):1438-43. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.06.009. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
7
The development and validation of the King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease (K-BILD) health status questionnaire.《国王简短间质性肺病(K-BILD)健康状况问卷的制定与验证》。
Thorax. 2012 Sep;67(9):804-10. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-201581. Epub 2012 May 3.
8
The SF-36 and SGRQ: validity and first look at minimum important differences in IPF.SF-36 和 SGRQ:在特发性肺纤维化中有效性和最小重要差异的初探。
Respir Med. 2010 Feb;104(2):296-304. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.09.006. Epub 2009 Oct 7.
9
Development and validation of a vision-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for Timor-Leste.东帝汶特定视力生活质量问卷的开发与验证
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Oct;49(10):4284-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-1893. Epub 2008 May 23.
10
Responsiveness and minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes.患者报告结局的反应性和最小重要差异
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Sep 27;4:70. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-70.