van Erp Teun, Hoozemans Marco, Foster Carl, de Koning Jos J
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019 Nov 1;14(10):1395-1400. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0877.
A valid measure for training load (TL) is an important tool for cyclists, trainers, and sport scientists involved in professional cycling. The aim of this study was to explore the influence of exercise intensity on the association between kilojoules (kJ) spent and different measures of TL to arrive at valid measures of TL.
Four years of field data were collected from 21 cyclists of a professional cycling team, including 11,716 training and race sessions. kJ spent was obtained from power output measurements, and others TLs were calculated based on the session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE), heart rate (Lucia training impulse [luTRIMP]), and power output (training stress score [TSS]). Exercise intensity was expressed by the intensity factor (IF). To study the effect of exercise intensity on the association between kJ spent and various other TLs (sRPE, luTRIMP, and TSS), data from low- and high-intensity sessions were subjected to regression analyses using generalized estimating equations.
This study shows that the IF is significantly different for training and race sessions (0.59 [0.03] vs 0.73 [0.03]). Significant regression coefficients show that kJ spent is a good predictor of sRPE, and luTRIMP, as well as TSS. However, IF does not influence the associations between kJ spent and sRPE and luTRIMP, while the association with TSS is different when sessions are done with low or high IF.
It seems that the TSS reacts differently to exercise intensity than sRPE and luTRIMP. A possible explanation could be the quadratic relation between IF and TSS.
对于参与职业自行车运动的自行车运动员、教练和运动科学家而言,一种有效的训练负荷(TL)测量方法是一项重要工具。本研究的目的是探讨运动强度对所消耗千焦(kJ)与不同TL测量指标之间关联的影响,以得出有效的TL测量指标。
从一支职业自行车队的21名自行车运动员收集了四年的现场数据,包括11716次训练和比赛时段。所消耗的kJ通过功率输出测量获得,其他TL指标则根据主观用力感觉评分(sRPE)、心率(卢西亚训练冲动[luTRIMP])和功率输出(训练压力得分[TSS])进行计算。运动强度用强度因子(IF)表示。为了研究运动强度对所消耗kJ与其他各种TL指标(sRPE、luTRIMP和TSS)之间关联的影响,使用广义估计方程对低强度和高强度时段的数据进行回归分析。
本研究表明,训练和比赛时段的IF存在显著差异(0.59[0.03]对0.73[0.03])。显著的回归系数表明,所消耗的kJ是sRPE、luTRIMP以及TSS的良好预测指标。然而,IF并不影响所消耗kJ与sRPE和luTRIMP之间的关联,而当以低或高IF进行训练时,与TSS的关联有所不同。
似乎TSS对运动强度的反应与sRPE和luTRIMP不同。一个可能的解释是IF与TSS之间的二次关系。