Leo Peter, Spragg James, Simon Dieter, Lawley Justin S, Mujika Iñigo
Department Sport Science, University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Spragg Cycle Coaching, Exeter 03833, UK.
Sports (Basel). 2020 Dec 17;8(12):167. doi: 10.3390/sports8120167.
The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in the power profile derived from training and racing, the training characteristics across a competitive season and the relationships between training and power profile in U23 professional cyclists.
Thirty male U23 professional cyclists (age, 20.0 ± 1.0 years; weight, 68.9 ± 6.9 kg; V˙O, 73.7 ± 2.5 mL·kg·min) participated in this study. The cycling season was split into pre-, early-, mid- and late-season periods. Power data 2, 5, 12 min mean maximum power (MMP), critical power (CP) and training characteristics (Hours, Total Work, eTRIMP, Work·h, eTRIMP·h, Time, Time and Time) were recorded for each period. Power profiles derived exclusively from either training or racing data and training characteristics were compared between periods. The relationships between the changes in training characteristics and changes in the power profile were also investigated.
The absolute and relative power profiles were higher during racing than training at all periods ( ≤ 0.001-0.020). Training characteristics were significantly different between periods, with the lowest values in pre-season followed by late-season ( ≤ 0.001-0.040). Changes in the power profile between early- and mid-season significantly correlated with the changes in training characteristics ( < 0.05, r = -0.59 to 0.45).
These findings reveal that a higher power profile was recorded during racing than training. In addition, training characteristics were lowest in pre-season followed by late-season. Changes in training characteristics correlated with changes in the power profile in early- and mid-season, but not in late-season. Practitioners should consider the influence of racing on the derived power profile and adequately balance training programs throughout a competitive season.
本研究的目的是调查U23职业自行车运动员在训练和比赛中获得的功率曲线差异、整个比赛赛季的训练特征以及训练与功率曲线之间的关系。
30名男性U23职业自行车运动员(年龄20.0±1.0岁;体重68.9±6.9千克;最大摄氧量73.7±2.5毫升·千克·分钟)参与了本研究。自行车赛季分为赛季前、赛季初、赛季中和赛季末几个阶段。记录每个阶段的功率数据,包括2分钟、5分钟、12分钟平均最大功率(MMP)、临界功率(CP)以及训练特征(时长、总功、等效训练强度分钟(eTRIMP)、功·小时、eTRIMP·小时、时间、时间和时间)。比较各阶段仅从训练或比赛数据得出的功率曲线以及训练特征。还研究了训练特征变化与功率曲线变化之间的关系。
在所有阶段,比赛期间的绝对和相对功率曲线均高于训练期间(P≤0.001 - 0.020)。各阶段的训练特征存在显著差异,赛季前最低,其次是赛季末(P≤0.001 - 0.040)。赛季初和赛季中之间功率曲线的变化与训练特征的变化显著相关(P<0.05,r = -0.59至0.45)。
这些发现表明,比赛期间记录的功率曲线高于训练期间。此外,赛季前训练特征最低,其次是赛季末。训练特征的变化与赛季初和赛季中功率曲线的变化相关,但与赛季末无关。从业者应考虑比赛对得出的功率曲线的影响,并在整个比赛赛季中充分平衡训练计划。