Park Ji-Hyoung, Soh Sarah, Kwak Young-Lan, Kim Bosung, Choi Sohyun, Shim Jae-Kwang
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Gangwon-do 26426, Korea.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, and Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea.
J Clin Med. 2019 Apr 6;8(4):472. doi: 10.3390/jcm8040472.
Anesthesia for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) involves a high-risk population having a broad spectrum of pain character and intensity. This study delved the anesthetic efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam, when used with remifentanil. Seventy patients scheduled for femoropopliteal PTA were randomized into two groups receiving either intermittent midazolam boluses (0.03⁻0.05 mg/kg) (MR group) or dexmedetomidine 0.2⁻0.7 μg/kg/h after a loading dose of 1.0 μg/kg for 10 min (DR group), both with remifentanil. The primary endpoint was the patients' satisfaction (1⁻5, 5; extremely satisfied). Secondary endpoints included postprocedural pain scores (0⁻10, 10; worst imaginable pain) and adverse events. The satisfaction level of patients was significantly greater in the DR group compared with the MR group (4.0 [3.0, 5.0] versus 4.0 [2.0, 5.0] = 0.021). The number of patients having a postprocedural pain score of at least 3 was significantly greater in the MR group compared with the DR group (10 [29%] versus 2 [6%], = 0.013). The number of patients with hypotensive episodes was higher in the DR group (5 [14.7%] versus 0, = 0.025), which could all be restored with ephedrine. The use of dexmedetomidine in conjunction with remifentanil may be a safe option that provides excellent patient satisfaction while potentially attenuating postprocedural pain.
经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)麻醉涉及高危人群,其疼痛性质和强度范围广泛。本研究探讨了右美托咪定与咪达唑仑在与瑞芬太尼联用时的麻醉效果。70例计划行股腘动脉PTA的患者被随机分为两组,分别接受间歇性咪达唑仑推注(0.03⁻0.05 mg/kg)(MR组)或在1.0 μg/kg负荷剂量输注10分钟后接受0.2⁻0.7 μg/kg/h的右美托咪定输注(DR组),两组均联用瑞芬太尼。主要终点是患者满意度(1⁻5分,5分为极其满意)。次要终点包括术后疼痛评分(0⁻10分,10分为难以想象的剧痛)和不良事件。与MR组相比,DR组患者的满意度显著更高(4.0 [3.0, 5.0] 对4.0 [2.0, 5.0],P = 0.021)。与DR组相比,MR组术后疼痛评分至少为3分的患者数量显著更多(10例 [29%] 对2例 [