Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
National Institute of Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care East Midlands, Nottingham, UK.
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 8;9(4):e026921. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026921.
Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) may be a way to deliver optimal care for care home residents. We used realist review to develop a theory-driven account of how CGA works in care homes.
Realist review.
Care homes.
The review had three stages: first, interviews with expert stakeholders and scoping of the literature to develop programme theories for CGA; second, iterative searches with structured retrieval and extraction of the literature; third, synthesis to refine the programme theory of how CGA works in care homes.We used the following databases: Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, PsychInfo, PubMed, Google Scholar, Greylit, Cochrane Library and Joanna Briggs Institute.
130 articles informed a programme theory which suggested CGA had three main components: structured comprehensive assessment, developing a care plan and working towards patient-centred goals. Each of these required engagement of a multidisciplinary team (MDT). Most evidence was available around assessment, with tension between structured assessment led by a single professional and less structured assessment involving multiple members of an MDT. Care planning needed to accommodate visiting clinicians and there was evidence that a core MDT often used care planning as a mechanism to seek external specialist support. Goal-setting processes were not always sufficiently patient-centred and did not always accommodate the views of care home staff. Studies reported improved outcomes from CGA affecting resident satisfaction, prescribing, healthcare resource use and objective measures of quality of care.
The programme theory described here provides a framework for understanding how CGA could be effective in care homes. It will be of use to teams developing, implementing or auditing CGA in care homes. All three components are required to make CGA work-this may explain why attempts to implement CGA by interventions focused solely on assessment or care planning have failed in some long-term care settings.
CRD42017062601.
全面老年评估(CGA)可能是为养老院居民提供最佳护理的一种方式。我们使用现实主义审查来制定一个理论驱动的账户,说明 CGA 在养老院中的工作方式。
现实主义审查。
养老院。
审查分为三个阶段:首先,对专家利益相关者进行访谈,并对文献进行范围界定,以制定 CGA 的方案理论;其次,进行迭代搜索,进行结构化检索和文献提取;最后,综合提炼 CGA 在养老院中运作的方案理论。我们使用了以下数据库:Medline、CINAHL、Scopus、PsychInfo、PubMed、Google Scholar、Greylit、Cochrane Library 和 Joanna Briggs Institute。
130 篇文章为一个方案理论提供了信息,该理论表明 CGA 有三个主要组成部分:结构化全面评估、制定护理计划和朝着以患者为中心的目标努力。每个部分都需要多学科团队(MDT)的参与。大多数证据都围绕评估展开,在由单一专业人员领导的结构化评估与多成员 MDT 参与的非结构化评估之间存在紧张关系。护理计划需要容纳来访的临床医生,有证据表明,一个核心的 MDT 通常将护理计划作为寻求外部专家支持的机制。目标设定过程并不总是以患者为中心,也不总是容纳养老院工作人员的意见。研究报告称,CGA 改善了居民满意度、处方、医疗保健资源利用和护理质量的客观衡量标准等方面的结果。
这里描述的方案理论为理解 CGA 在养老院中如何有效提供了一个框架。它将对在养老院中开发、实施或审核 CGA 的团队有用。要使 CGA 发挥作用,需要所有三个组成部分——这可能解释了为什么在一些长期护理环境中,仅通过干预措施集中在评估或护理计划上的尝试未能成功。
CRD42017062601。