Ishibashi Mana, Tanabe Yoshio, Yunaga Hiroto, Miyoshi Hidenao, Miwa Ken, Nakamura Hiroshige, Fujii Shinya, Ogawa Toshihide
Division of Radiology, Department of Pathophysiological and Therapeutic Science, School of Medicine, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Yonago 683-8503, Japan.
†Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Yonago 683-8503, Japan.
Yonago Acta Med. 2019 Mar 28;62(1):146-152. doi: 10.33160/yam.2019.03.020. eCollection 2019 Mar.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between preoperative FDG-PET parameters and the World Health Organization (WHO) classification or Masaoka staging system of thymic epithelial tumors.
We retrospectively reviewed 32 patients with histologically proven thymic epithelial tumors who underwent FDG-PET/CT before surgical resection. FDG-PET parameters, including the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolytic activity (TLG), were measured. These PET parameters were compared in the Masaoka staging system and WHO classification. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed to identify the cut-off values of PET parameters for the accurate differentiation of early and advanced stages in the Masaoka staging system.
There were 17 low-risk thymomas (1 type A, 9 type AB, and 7 type B1), 8 high-risk thymomas (4 type B2 and 4 type B3), and 7 thymic carcinomas (7 squamous cell carcinoma). Their Masaoka stages were as follows: 24 in the early stage (stages I and II) and 8 in the advanced stage (stage III). Regarding the WHO classification, only SUVmax showed a significant difference ( < 0.05). In the Masaoka stage, all PET parameters were significantly higher in the advanced stage than in the early stage ( < 0.05). In the ROC analysis to predict the early and advanced stages in thymic epithelial tumors, the area under the curve was the highest for TLG among the PET parameters examined and the cut-off value of TLG for discriminating the early from advanced stage with maximal sensitivity and specificity was 30.735.
Although volumetric PET parameters, such as MTV and TLG, did not correlate with the WHO classification, a significant correlation was observed between SUVmax and the WHO classification. In the Masaoka staging system, volumetric PET parameters may achieve more precise staging than SUVmax.
本研究旨在探讨术前氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET)参数与世界卫生组织(WHO)胸腺上皮肿瘤分类或Masaoka分期系统之间的关系。
我们回顾性分析了32例经组织学证实的胸腺上皮肿瘤患者,这些患者在手术切除前接受了FDG-PET/CT检查。测量了FDG-PET参数,包括最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)、代谢肿瘤体积(MTV)和总病变糖酵解活性(TLG)。在Masaoka分期系统和WHO分类中比较了这些PET参数。进行了受试者操作特征(ROC)分析,以确定PET参数在Masaoka分期系统中准确区分早期和晚期的临界值。
有17例低风险胸腺瘤(1例A型、9例AB型和7例B1型)、8例高风险胸腺瘤(4例B2型和4例B3型)和7例胸腺癌(7例鳞状细胞癌)。它们的Masaoka分期如下:早期(I期和II期)24例,晚期(III期)8例。关于WHO分类,只有SUVmax显示出显著差异(<0.05)。在Masaoka分期中,所有PET参数在晚期均显著高于早期(<0.05)。在预测胸腺上皮肿瘤早期和晚期的ROC分析中,在所检查的PET参数中,TLG的曲线下面积最高,TLG区分早期和晚期的临界值为30.735,具有最大的敏感性和特异性。
尽管MTV和TLG等PET体积参数与WHO分类无关,但SUVmax与WHO分类之间存在显著相关性。在Masaoka分期系统中,PET体积参数可能比SUVmax实现更精确的分期。