Suppr超能文献

我们对管理差距了解多少?

What Do We Know About the Stewardship Gap.

作者信息

York Jeremy, Gutmann Myron, Berman Francine

机构信息

University of Michigan.

University of Colorado Boulder.

出版信息

Data Sci J. 2018;17. doi: 10.5334/dsj-2018-019. Epub 2018 Aug 17.

Abstract

In the 21 century, digital data drive innovation and decision-making in nearly every field. However, little is known about the total size, characteristics, and sustainability of these data. In the scholarly sphere, it is widely suspected that there is a gap between the amount of valuable digital data that is produced and the amount that is effectively stewarded and made accessible. The Stewardship Gap Project (http://bit.ly/stewardshipgap) investigates characteristics of, and measures, the stewardship gap for sponsored scholarly activity in the United States. This paper presents a preliminary definition of the stewardship gap based on a review of relevant literature and investigates areas of the stewardship gap for which metrics have been developed and measurements made, and where work to measure the stewardship gap is yet to be done. The main findings presented are 1) there is not one stewardship gap but rather multiple "gaps" that contribute to whether data is responsibly stewarded; 2) there are relationships between the gaps that can be used to guide strategies for addressing the various stewardship gaps; and 3) there are imbalances in the types and depths of studies that have been conducted to measure the stewardship gap.

摘要

在21世纪,数字数据推动着几乎每个领域的创新和决策。然而,对于这些数据的总体规模、特征和可持续性,我们却知之甚少。在学术领域,人们普遍怀疑,所产生的有价值数字数据量与得到有效管理并可获取的数据量之间存在差距。管理差距项目(http://bit.ly/stewardshipgap)对美国受资助学术活动的管理差距特征进行调查并加以衡量。本文在回顾相关文献的基础上,给出了管理差距的初步定义,并对已制定指标并进行测量的管理差距领域,以及有待开展管理差距测量工作的领域进行了调查。所呈现的主要研究结果为:1)并非存在一种管理差距,而是存在多种“差距”,这些“差距 ”共同影响着数据是否得到妥善管理;2)这些差距之间存在关联,可用于指导应对各种管理差距的策略;3)在为测量管理差距而开展的研究类型和深度方面存在不平衡。

相似文献

1
What Do We Know About the Stewardship Gap.我们对管理差距了解多少?
Data Sci J. 2018;17. doi: 10.5334/dsj-2018-019. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
3
Environmental Stewardship: A Conceptual Review and Analytical Framework.环境管理:概念性综述与分析框架
Environ Manage. 2018 Apr;61(4):597-614. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0993-2. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
The TRUST Principles for digital repositories.TRUST 数字知识库原则。
Sci Data. 2020 May 14;7(1):144. doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7.

本文引用的文献

1
A game theoretic analysis of research data sharing.研究数据共享的博弈论分析
PeerJ. 2015 Sep 8;3:e1242. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1242. eCollection 2015.
4
What drives academic data sharing?是什么推动了学术数据共享?
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 25;10(2):e0118053. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118053. eCollection 2015.
8
Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions.科学家的数据共享:实践与看法。
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021101. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
9
Dealing with data. Challenges and opportunities. Introduction.数据处理。挑战与机遇。引言。
Science. 2011 Feb 11;331(6018):692-3. doi: 10.1126/science.331.6018.692.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验