• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全膝关节置换术中的一次性定制器械:对住院并发症、住院时间和出院处置的影响。

Single-Use Custom Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Effect on In-Hospital Complications, Length of Stay, and Discharge Disposition.

作者信息

Harold Ryan E, Macleod Jonathan, Butler Bennet A, Sullivan Ryan, Beal Matthew D, Manning David W

出版信息

Orthopedics. 2019 Sep 1;42(5):299-303. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20190403-03. Epub 2019 Apr 9.

DOI:10.3928/01477447-20190403-03
PMID:30964541
Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a quality surgical intervention with rapidly increasing use. This growth has brought with it a host of new technologies, including custom instrumentation (CI). With the current emphasis on value-based health care, the clinical benefit of CI TKA must be evaluated. The goal of this study was to compare CI and conventional TKA regarding multiple quality metrics, in-hospital complications, length of stay, and discharge destination. The authors propensity score matched 231 conventional TKAs to 231 consecutive CI TKAs for age, sex, and body mass index. Preoperative risk factors analyzed were age, sex, body mass index, and preoperative hemoglobin. Perioperative factors included transfusion rate, hemoglobin drop, hemovac output, operative time, length of stay, discharge disposition, deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism rates, and in-hospital vital sign data. There were no differences in preoperative demographics between groups. Postoperatively, there was no difference between conventional and CI TKA in operative time, transfusion rate, discharge hemoglobin, length of stay, discharge disposition, or in-hospital venous thromboembolism rates. In the conventional and CI groups, length of stay was 2.6 and 2.5 days (P=.43) and discharge disposition was 82% home and 83% home (P=.90), respectively. Although CI TKA is commonly implemented, in this analysis, compared with conventional TKA, it was not associated with any difference in length of stay, discharge disposition, operative time, transfusion rate, or in-hospital complications. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(5):299-303.].

摘要

全膝关节置换术(TKA)是一种应用迅速增加的高质量外科手术干预措施。这种增长带来了一系列新技术,包括定制器械(CI)。随着当前对基于价值的医疗保健的重视,必须评估CI TKA的临床益处。本研究的目的是比较CI TKA和传统TKA在多个质量指标、住院并发症、住院时间和出院目的地方面的差异。作者根据年龄、性别和体重指数,采用倾向评分法将231例传统TKA与231例连续的CI TKA进行匹配。分析的术前危险因素包括年龄、性别、体重指数和术前血红蛋白。围手术期因素包括输血率、血红蛋白下降、引流管引流量、手术时间、住院时间、出院处置、深静脉血栓形成和肺栓塞发生率以及住院期间生命体征数据。两组术前人口统计学特征无差异。术后,传统TKA和CI TKA在手术时间、输血率、出院时血红蛋白、住院时间、出院处置或住院期间静脉血栓栓塞发生率方面无差异。在传统组和CI组中,住院时间分别为2.6天和2.5天(P = 0.43),出院处置回家的比例分别为82%和83%(P = 0.90)。尽管CI TKA已普遍实施,但在本分析中,与传统TKA相比,它在住院时间、出院处置、手术时间、输血率或住院并发症方面没有差异。[《骨科学》。2019年;42(5):299 - 303。]

相似文献

1
Single-Use Custom Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Effect on In-Hospital Complications, Length of Stay, and Discharge Disposition.全膝关节置换术中的一次性定制器械:对住院并发症、住院时间和出院处置的影响。
Orthopedics. 2019 Sep 1;42(5):299-303. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20190403-03. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
2
Postoperative Morbidity and Discharge Destinations After Fast-Track Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Older Than 85 Years.85岁以上患者行快速康复髋关节和膝关节置换术后的并发症及出院去向
Anesth Analg. 2016 Jun;122(6):1807-15. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001190.
3
Operative Time, Length of Stay, Short-Term Readmission, and Complications after Hinged Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.铰链式初次全膝关节置换术后的手术时间、住院时间、短期再入院率及并发症:一项倾向评分匹配分析
J Knee Surg. 2018 Nov;31(10):940-945. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1668580. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
4
Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved early functional recovery and reduced time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.机器人辅助全膝关节置换术与传统基于夹具的全膝关节置换术相比,可改善早期功能恢复并减少住院时间:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Bone Joint J. 2018 Jul;100-B(7):930-937. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B7.BJJ-2017-1449.R1.
5
Hospital Discharge within 2 Days Following Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Increase Major-Complication and Readmission Rates.全髋关节或膝关节置换术后2天内出院不会增加主要并发症和再入院率。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Sep 7;98(17):1419-28. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01109.
6
Trends in in-hospital major morbidity and mortality after total joint arthroplasty: United States 1998-2008.1998-2008 年美国全关节置换术后院内主要发病率和死亡率趋势。
Anesth Analg. 2012 Aug;115(2):321-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31825b6824. Epub 2012 May 31.
7
Lower Perioperative Complication Rates and Shorter Lengths of Hospital Stay Associated With Technology-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Versus Conventional Instrumentation in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.与传统器械相比,在初次全膝关节置换术中,采用技术辅助的全膝关节置换术可降低围手术期并发症发生率并缩短住院时间。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Jun;39(6):1512-1517. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.12.015. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
8
Tranexamic acid versus aminocaproic acid for blood management after total knee and total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.氨甲环酸与氨基己酸在全膝关节和全髋关节置换术后血液管理中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 Jun;54(Pt A):105-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.042. Epub 2018 May 1.
9
Readmission, Reoperation, and Complications: Total Hip vs Total Knee Arthroplasty.再入院率、再次手术率和并发症:全髋关节与全膝关节置换术比较。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Mar;33(3):655-660. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.048. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
10
Comparing In-Hospital Total Joint Arthroplasty Outcomes and Resource Consumption Among Underweight and Morbidly Obese Patients.比较体重过轻和病态肥胖患者的院内全关节置换术结果及资源消耗情况。
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Oct;31(10):2085-90. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.015. Epub 2016 Mar 15.