Harold Ryan E, Macleod Jonathan, Butler Bennet A, Sullivan Ryan, Beal Matthew D, Manning David W
Orthopedics. 2019 Sep 1;42(5):299-303. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20190403-03. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a quality surgical intervention with rapidly increasing use. This growth has brought with it a host of new technologies, including custom instrumentation (CI). With the current emphasis on value-based health care, the clinical benefit of CI TKA must be evaluated. The goal of this study was to compare CI and conventional TKA regarding multiple quality metrics, in-hospital complications, length of stay, and discharge destination. The authors propensity score matched 231 conventional TKAs to 231 consecutive CI TKAs for age, sex, and body mass index. Preoperative risk factors analyzed were age, sex, body mass index, and preoperative hemoglobin. Perioperative factors included transfusion rate, hemoglobin drop, hemovac output, operative time, length of stay, discharge disposition, deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism rates, and in-hospital vital sign data. There were no differences in preoperative demographics between groups. Postoperatively, there was no difference between conventional and CI TKA in operative time, transfusion rate, discharge hemoglobin, length of stay, discharge disposition, or in-hospital venous thromboembolism rates. In the conventional and CI groups, length of stay was 2.6 and 2.5 days (P=.43) and discharge disposition was 82% home and 83% home (P=.90), respectively. Although CI TKA is commonly implemented, in this analysis, compared with conventional TKA, it was not associated with any difference in length of stay, discharge disposition, operative time, transfusion rate, or in-hospital complications. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(5):299-303.].
全膝关节置换术(TKA)是一种应用迅速增加的高质量外科手术干预措施。这种增长带来了一系列新技术,包括定制器械(CI)。随着当前对基于价值的医疗保健的重视,必须评估CI TKA的临床益处。本研究的目的是比较CI TKA和传统TKA在多个质量指标、住院并发症、住院时间和出院目的地方面的差异。作者根据年龄、性别和体重指数,采用倾向评分法将231例传统TKA与231例连续的CI TKA进行匹配。分析的术前危险因素包括年龄、性别、体重指数和术前血红蛋白。围手术期因素包括输血率、血红蛋白下降、引流管引流量、手术时间、住院时间、出院处置、深静脉血栓形成和肺栓塞发生率以及住院期间生命体征数据。两组术前人口统计学特征无差异。术后,传统TKA和CI TKA在手术时间、输血率、出院时血红蛋白、住院时间、出院处置或住院期间静脉血栓栓塞发生率方面无差异。在传统组和CI组中,住院时间分别为2.6天和2.5天(P = 0.43),出院处置回家的比例分别为82%和83%(P = 0.90)。尽管CI TKA已普遍实施,但在本分析中,与传统TKA相比,它在住院时间、出院处置、手术时间、输血率或住院并发症方面没有差异。[《骨科学》。2019年;42(5):299 - 303。]