Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University , Geelong , Australia.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Jun 1;316(6):E1061-E1070. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00500.2018. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
Currently, it is unclear whether short-term overfeeding in healthy people significantly affects postprandial glucose regulation, as most human overfeeding studies have utilized induced experimental conditions such as the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp technique to assess glucoregulation. The aim of this study was to quantify glucose fluxes [rates of meal glucose appearance (R), disposal (R), and endogenous glucose production (EGP)] in response to 5 and 28 days of overfeeding (+45% energy) while maintaining habitual macronutrient composition (31.0 ± 1.9% fat, 48.6 ± 2.2% carbohydrate, 16.7 ± 1.4% protein) in healthy, lean young men. Meal tolerance testing was combined with the triple-stable isotope glucose tracer approach. Visceral adipose volume increased by ~15% with 5 days of overfeeding, while there was no further change at 28 days. In contrast, body mass (+1.6 kg) and fat mass (+1.3 kg) were significantly increased only after 28 days of overfeeding. Fasting EGP, R, and insulin were increased at 5 but unchanged after 28 days. Postprandial glucose and insulin responses were unaltered by 5 days of overfeeding but were modestly increased after 28 days ( < 0.05). However, meal R and glucose R were significantly increased after both 5 and 28 days of overfeeding ( < 0.05). Despite this, overfeeding did not lead to alterations to postprandial EGP suppression. Thus, in contrast to findings from euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp studies, chronic overfeeding did not affect the ability to suppress EGP or stimulate R under postprandial conditions. Rather, glucose flux was appropriately maintained following 28 days of overfeeding through modest increases in postprandial glycemia and insulinemia.
目前,关于健康人群中短期过度进食是否会显著影响餐后血糖调节还不清楚,因为大多数人类过度进食研究都利用诱导性实验条件,如正葡萄糖高胰岛素钳夹技术来评估糖调节。本研究的目的是量化 5 天和 28 天过度进食(增加 45%能量)期间葡萄糖通量[餐时葡萄糖出现率(R)、处置率(R)和内源性葡萄糖生成率(EGP)]的变化,同时保持习惯性宏量营养素组成(31.0±1.9%脂肪、48.6±2.2%碳水化合物、16.7±1.4%蛋白质),研究对象为健康、瘦的年轻男性。餐时耐受性测试与三重稳定同位素葡萄糖示踪剂方法相结合。5 天过度进食后内脏脂肪体积增加约 15%,而 28 天后则没有进一步变化。相比之下,只有在 28 天过度进食后,体重(增加 1.6 公斤)和体脂(增加 1.3 公斤)才会显著增加。5 天过度进食后空腹 EGP、R 和胰岛素增加,但 28 天后不变。5 天过度进食后餐后血糖和胰岛素反应没有变化,但 28 天后略有增加(<0.05)。然而,5 天和 28 天过度进食后餐时 R 和葡萄糖 R 均显著增加(<0.05)。尽管如此,过度进食并没有导致餐后 EGP 抑制的改变。因此,与正葡萄糖高胰岛素钳夹研究的结果相反,慢性过度进食并没有影响在餐后条件下抑制 EGP 或刺激 R 的能力。相反,在 28 天过度进食后,通过适度增加餐后血糖和胰岛素水平,适当维持了葡萄糖通量。