Department of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology , Eindhoven , The Netherlands.
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2019 Mar 25;377(2141):20170444. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2017.0444.
The speed at which fusion energy can be deployed is considered. Several economical factors are identified that impede this speed. Most importantly, the combination of an unprecedentedly high investment level needed for the proof of principle and the relatively long construction time of fusion plants precludes an effective innovation cycle. The valley of death is discussed, i.e. the period when a large investment is needed for the construction of early generations of fusion reactors, when there is no return yet. It is concluded that, within the mainstream scenario-a few DEMO reactors towards 2060 followed by generations of relatively large reactors-there is no realistic path to an appreciable contribution to the energy mix in the twenty-first century if economic constraints are applied. In other words, fusion will not contribute to the energy transition in the time frame of the Paris climate agreement. Within the frame of this analysis, the development of smaller, cheaper and most importantly, fast-to-build fusion plants could possibly represent an option to accelerate the introduction of fusion power. Whether this is possible is a technical question that is outside the scope of this paper, but this question is addressed in other contributions to the Royal Society workshop. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Fusion energy using tokamaks: can development be accelerated?'.
考虑了聚变能的部署速度。确定了几个经济因素会阻碍这个速度。最重要的是,为了证明原理而需要前所未有的高投资水平,以及聚变工厂相对较长的建设时间,这两者结合排除了有效的创新周期。讨论了死亡之谷,即在早期几代聚变反应堆建设需要大量投资而尚未有回报的时期。得出的结论是,如果考虑到经济限制,在主流情景下(到 2060 年有几个示范反应堆,然后是几代相对较大的反应堆),在二十一世纪,如果应用经济限制,聚变就不可能对能源组合做出明显贡献。换句话说,聚变不会在巴黎气候协议的时间框架内为能源转型做出贡献。在这种分析框架内,开发更小、更便宜且最重要的是能够更快建设的聚变工厂,可能是加速引入聚变能的一种选择。这是否可行是一个超出本文范围的技术问题,但这个问题在皇家学会研讨会的其他贡献中有所涉及。本文是讨论会议议题“使用托卡马克的聚变能:能否加速开发?”的一部分。