Speaking of gender bias.
作者信息
Berenbaum May R
出版信息
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 23;116(17):8086-8088. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1904750116. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Speaking of gender bias.说到性别偏见。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 23;116(17):8086-8088. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1904750116. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
2
Editorial: Gender Bias in Publishing: Double-Blind Reviewing as a Solution?社论：出版中的性别偏见：双盲评审是解决之道吗？
eNeuro. 2018 Jun 26;5(3). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0225-18.2018. eCollection 2018 May-Jun.
3
Gender bias at Pediatric Research?儿科研究中的性别偏见？
Pediatr Res. 2019 Jul;86(1):2. doi: 10.1038/s41390-018-0246-y. Epub 2018 Dec 9.
4
Physician ethics in human research: the role of medical publications.
Ann Emerg Med. 1990 Jul;19(7):828-30. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81715-9.
5
Research papers, gender bias and peer-review.研究论文、性别偏见与同行评审。
Biol Lett. 2017 Aug;13(8). doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2017.0424. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
6
Gender differences in authorships are not associated with publication bias in an evolutionary journal.在进化期刊中，作者的性别差异与发表偏倚无关。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 29;13(8):e0201725. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201725. eCollection 2018.
7
Publication bias. The triumph of hope over experience.
JAMA. 1992 Jan 15;267(3):411-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.267.3.411.
8
What is the quality of the reporting of research ethics in publications of nursing home research?疗养院研究出版物中研究伦理报告的质量如何？
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999 Jan;47(1):76-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb01904.x.
9
How often are ethics approval and informed consent reported in publications on health research in Cameroon? A five-year review.喀麦隆关于健康研究的出版物中伦理批准和知情同意的报告频率如何？一项为期五年的综述。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Sep;6(3):93-7. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.3.93.
10
[To lead by example and emulation among other editorial boards, officials of the newspaper <the ABC> should they be more explicit about the bioethical values they recommend to their authors and their reviewers to consider?].[为了在其他编辑委员会中起到带头和效仿作用，《ABC报》的官员们是否应该更明确地阐述他们建议作者和审稿人考虑的生物伦理价值观？]
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2011 Sep-Oct;69(5):615-7.
引用本文的文献
1
Gender imbalances in the editorial activities of a selective journal run by academic editors.学术编辑主导的选择性期刊编辑活动中的性别失衡。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 11;18(12):e0294805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294805. eCollection 2023.
2
Gender inequality and self-publication are common among academic editors.学术编辑中普遍存在性别不平等和自我出版现象。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Mar;7(3):353-364. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01498-1. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
3
Gendered citation patterns among the scientific elite.科学界精英中的性别引文模式。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Oct 4;119(40):e2206070119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2206070119. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
4
Brazilian female researchers do not publish less despite an academic structure that deepens sex gap.巴西女性研究人员的发表成果并不少于男性，尽管学术结构加深了性别差距。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 29;17(8):e0273291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273291. eCollection 2022.
5
A Year into the Pandemic: An Update on Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, Math, and Medicine.大流行一年后：科学、技术、工程、数学和医学领域女性的最新情况。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Apr;19(4):517-524. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202107-875CME.
6
Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals.COVID-19 大流行第一波期间期刊投稿和同行评审中的性别差距。对 2329 种爱思唯尔期刊的研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 20;16(10):e0257919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257919. eCollection 2021.
7
Gender inequities in the online dissemination of scholars' work.学者作品在线传播中的性别不平等
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Sep 28;118(39). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2102945118.
8
Towards diversity in science - a glance at gender disparity in the Brazilian Society of Neuroscience and Behavior (SBNeC).迈向科学多元化——巴西神经科学与行为学会（SBNeC）中的性别差距一瞥。
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2021 Jul 16;54(10):e11026. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X2020e11026. eCollection 2021.
9
Gender Bias in the News: A Scalable Topic Modelling and Visualization Framework.新闻中的性别偏见：一个可扩展的主题建模与可视化框架
Front Artif Intell. 2021 Jun 16;4:664737. doi: 10.3389/frai.2021.664737. eCollection 2021.
10
Peer review and gender bias: A study on 145 scholarly journals.同行评审与性别偏见：对145种学术期刊的研究
Sci Adv. 2021 Jan 6;7(2). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd0299. Print 2021 Jan.
本文引用的文献
1
Advancing Science: How Bias Holds Us Back.推进科学：偏见如何阻碍我们。
Neuron. 2018 Aug 22;99(4):635-639. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.07.045.
2
How gender determines the way we speak about professionals.性别如何决定我们谈论专业人士的方式。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 10;115(28):7278-7283. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805284115. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
3
Word embeddings quantify 100 years of gender and ethnic stereotypes.词嵌入量化了 100 年来的性别和种族刻板印象。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Apr 17;115(16):E3635-E3644. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1720347115. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
4
Gender disparities in colloquium speakers at top universities.顶尖大学研讨会演讲者中的性别差距。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jan 2;115(1):104-108. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708414115. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
5
Gender bias in scholarly peer review.学术同行评审中的性别偏见。
Elife. 2017 Mar 21;6:e21718. doi: 10.7554/eLife.21718.
6
Opinion: Gender diversity leads to better science.观点：性别多样性带来更出色的科学成果。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Feb 21;114(8):1740-1742. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1700616114.
7
Under-representation of women on dental journal editorial boards.牙科期刊编辑委员会中女性代表人数不足。
PLoS One. 2015 Jan 30;10(1):e0116630. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116630. eCollection 2015.
8
Gender-heterogeneous working groups produce higher quality science.性别多元化的工作团队能产出质量更高的科研成果。
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 30;8(10):e79147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079147. eCollection 2013.
9
The role of gender in scholarly authorship.性别在学术著作中的作用。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 22;8(7):e66212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066212. Print 2013.
10
Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students.理科教员微妙的性别偏见偏爱男学生。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 9;109(41):16474-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211286109. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
Zotero 插件