• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Word embeddings quantify 100 years of gender and ethnic stereotypes.词嵌入量化了 100 年来的性别和种族刻板印象。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Apr 17;115(16):E3635-E3644. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1720347115. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
2
The Evolution of Occupational Segregation in the United States, 1940-2010: Gains and Losses of Gender-Race/Ethnicity Groups.1940 - 2010年美国职业隔离的演变:性别 - 种族/族裔群体的得失
Demography. 2015 Jun;52(3):967-88. doi: 10.1007/s13524-015-0390-5.
3
Gender Stereotypes in Natural Language: Word Embeddings Show Robust Consistency Across Child and Adult Language Corpora of More Than 65 Million Words.自然语言中的性别刻板印象:词嵌入在超过6500万个单词的儿童和成人语言语料库中显示出强大的一致性。
Psychol Sci. 2021 Feb;32(2):218-240. doi: 10.1177/0956797620963619. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
4
Using word embeddings to investigate cultural biases.利用词嵌入来研究文化偏见。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Jan;62(1):617-629. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12560. Epub 2022 Jul 23.
5
Historical representations of social groups across 200 years of word embeddings from Google Books.200 年谷歌书籍语料库中的词嵌入技术对社会群体的历史描述。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jul 12;119(28):e2121798119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2121798119. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
6
Prejudices in Cultural Contexts: Shared Stereotypes (Gender, Age) Versus Variable Stereotypes (Race, Ethnicity, Religion).文化背景下的偏见:共享刻板印象(性别、年龄)与可变刻板印象(种族、民族、宗教)。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Sep;12(5):791-799. doi: 10.1177/1745691617708204.
7
Extracting intersectional stereotypes from embeddings: Developing and validating the Flexible Intersectional Stereotype Extraction procedure.从嵌入中提取交叉刻板印象:开发和验证灵活的交叉刻板印象提取程序。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Mar 19;3(3):pgae089. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae089. eCollection 2024 Mar.
8
America's racial framework of superiority and Americanness embedded in natural language.美国的优越种族框架以及蕴含在自然语言中的美国特性。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Jan 2;3(1):pgad485. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad485. eCollection 2024 Jan.
9
Identifying and predicting stereotype change in large language corpora: 72 groups, 115 years (1900-2015), and four text sources.识别和预测大语言语料库中的刻板印象变化:72个群体、115年(1900 - 2015年)以及四个文本来源。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023 Nov;125(5):969-990. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000354. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
10
Leveraging Temporal Trends for Training Contextual Word Embeddings to Address Bias in Biomedical Applications: Development Study.利用时间趋势训练上下文词嵌入以解决生物医学应用中的偏差:发展研究
JMIR AI. 2024 Oct 2;3:e49546. doi: 10.2196/49546.

引用本文的文献

1
Role and Use of Race in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Models Related to Health.种族在与健康相关的人工智能和机器学习模型中的作用及应用
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 31;27:e73996. doi: 10.2196/73996.
2
Revisiting the Semantic Severity of Anxiety and Depression: Computational Linguistic Study of Normalization and Pathologization.重新审视焦虑和抑郁的语义严重程度:正常化与病态化的计算语言学研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 22;27:e73950. doi: 10.2196/73950.
3
Gender differences in resume language and gender gaps in salary expectations.简历语言中的性别差异与薪资期望中的性别差距。
J R Soc Interface. 2025 Jun;22(227):20240784. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0784. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
4
Cultural differences in the beauty premium.美貌溢价中的文化差异。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 21;15(1):17632. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02857-4.
5
Lexical associations can characterize clinical documentation trends related to palliative care and metastatic cancer.词汇关联可以表征与姑息治疗和转移性癌症相关的临床文档趋势。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 18;15(1):17245. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01828-z.
6
Kernels of selfhood: GPT-4o shows humanlike patterns of cognitive dissonance moderated by free choice.自我内核:GPT-4o展现出由自由选择调节的类似人类的认知失调模式。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 May 20;122(20):e2501823122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2501823122. Epub 2025 May 14.
7
Learning Universal Representations of Intermolecular Interactions with ATOMICA.利用ATOMICA学习分子间相互作用的通用表示。
bioRxiv. 2025 Jul 15:2025.04.02.646906. doi: 10.1101/2025.04.02.646906.
8
Whose voice matters? Word embeddings reveal identity bias in news quotes.谁的声音重要?词嵌入揭示新闻引语中的身份偏见。
EPJ Data Sci. 2025;14(1):30. doi: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-025-00541-1. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
9
Differences in psychologists' cognitive traits are associated with scientific divides.心理学家认知特征的差异与科学分歧相关。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02153-1.
10
Stereotypical bias amplification and reversal in an experimental model of human interaction with generative artificial intelligence.人类与生成式人工智能交互实验模型中的刻板印象偏差放大与逆转
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Apr 9;12(4):241472. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241472. eCollection 2025 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Cultural Shift or Linguistic Drift? Comparing Two Computational Measures of Semantic Change.文化转变还是语言演变?比较语义变化的两种计算方法。
Proc Conf Empir Methods Nat Lang Process. 2016 Nov;2016:2116-2121. doi: 10.18653/v1/d16-1229.
2
Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases.从语言语料库中自动推导出来的语义包含类人偏见。
Science. 2017 Apr 14;356(6334):183-186. doi: 10.1126/science.aal4230.
3
Women and hysteria in the history of mental health.精神卫生史上的女性与癔症
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2012;8:110-9. doi: 10.2174/1745017901208010110. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
4
Stereotyping by omission: eliminate the negative, accentuate the positive.刻板印象的省略:消除负面,强调正面。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Jun;102(6):1214-38. doi: 10.1037/a0027717. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
5
Stereotype persistence and change among college students.大学生中的刻板印象的持续与变化
J Abnorm Psychol. 1951 Apr;46(2):245-54. doi: 10.1037/h0053696.
6
A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition.一个(通常是混合的)刻板印象内容模型:能力和热情分别源于感知到的地位和竞争。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jun;82(6):878-902.
7
On the fading of social stereotypes: studies in three generations of college students.论社会刻板印象的消退:对三代大学生的研究
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1969 Sep;13(1):1-16. doi: 10.1037/h0027994.

词嵌入量化了 100 年来的性别和种族刻板印象。

Word embeddings quantify 100 years of gender and ethnic stereotypes.

机构信息

Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;

Department of History, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Apr 17;115(16):E3635-E3644. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1720347115. Epub 2018 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1720347115
PMID:29615513
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5910851/
Abstract

Word embeddings are a powerful machine-learning framework that represents each English word by a vector. The geometric relationship between these vectors captures meaningful semantic relationships between the corresponding words. In this paper, we develop a framework to demonstrate how the temporal dynamics of the embedding helps to quantify changes in stereotypes and attitudes toward women and ethnic minorities in the 20th and 21st centuries in the United States. We integrate word embeddings trained on 100 y of text data with the US Census to show that changes in the embedding track closely with demographic and occupation shifts over time. The embedding captures societal shifts-e.g., the women's movement in the 1960s and Asian immigration into the United States-and also illuminates how specific adjectives and occupations became more closely associated with certain populations over time. Our framework for temporal analysis of word embedding opens up a fruitful intersection between machine learning and quantitative social science.

摘要

词嵌入是一种强大的机器学习框架,通过向量来表示每个英文单词。这些向量之间的几何关系捕捉到了相应单词之间有意义的语义关系。在本文中,我们开发了一个框架,展示了词嵌入的时间动态如何帮助量化 20 世纪和 21 世纪美国对女性和少数族裔的刻板印象和态度的变化。我们将经过 100 年文本数据训练的词嵌入与美国人口普查数据相结合,表明嵌入的变化与人口和职业随时间的变化密切相关。该嵌入捕捉到了社会变化,例如 20 世纪 60 年代的妇女运动和美国的亚洲移民,也揭示了随着时间的推移,特定形容词和职业是如何与特定人群更紧密地联系在一起的。我们的词嵌入时间分析框架为机器学习和定量社会科学之间的交叉研究开辟了一条富有成果的道路。