Suppr超能文献

预测能量方程在确定成人烧伤患者能量消耗方面不准确:一项回顾性观察研究。

Predictive energy equations are inaccurate for determining energy expenditure in adult burn injury: a retrospective observational study.

作者信息

Leung James, Ridley Emma J, Cleland Heather, Ihle Joshua F, Paul Eldho, King Susannah J

机构信息

Victorian Adult Burns Service, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Nutrition Department, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2019 May;89(5):578-583. doi: 10.1111/ans.15119. Epub 2019 Apr 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Severe burn injuries are associated with hypermetabolism. This study aimed to compare the measured energy expenditure (mEE) with predicted energy requirements (pERs), and to correlate energy expenditure (EE) with clinical parameters in adults with severe burn injury.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively analysed on 29 burn patients (median (interquartile range) age: 46 (28-61) years, % total body surface area burn: 37% (18-46%)) admitted to an intensive care unit. Indirect calorimetry was performed on 1-4 occasions per patient to measure EE. mEE was compared with pER calculated using four prediction equations. Bland-Altman and correlation analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Mean ± SD mEE was 9752 ± 2089 kJ/day (143 ± 32% of predicted basal metabolic rate). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated clinically important overestimation for three of the four prediction equations and wide 95% limits of agreement for all equations. Overestimation of EE was more marked early post-burn. mEE correlated with day post-burn (r = 0.42, P = 0.004) and number of operations prior to first EE measurement (r = 0.34, P = 0.016), but not with % total body surface area (r = 0.02, P = 0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with severe burn injury exhibit hypermetabolism. The observed poor agreement between pER and mEE at an individual level indicates the value of indirect calorimetry in determining EE in burn injury.

摘要

背景

严重烧伤与高代谢有关。本研究旨在比较实测能量消耗(mEE)与预测能量需求(pER),并将严重烧伤成年患者的能量消耗(EE)与临床参数进行关联分析。

方法

对入住重症监护病房的29例烧伤患者(年龄中位数(四分位间距):46(28 - 61)岁,烧伤总面积:37%(18 - 46%))的数据进行回顾性分析。每位患者进行1 - 4次间接测热法以测量EE。将mEE与使用四个预测方程计算的pER进行比较。进行布兰德-奥特曼分析和相关性分析。

结果

mEE的均值±标准差为9752±2089kJ/天(预测基础代谢率的143±32%)。布兰德-奥特曼分析表明,四个预测方程中有三个在临床上存在重要的高估情况,且所有方程的95%一致性界限较宽。烧伤后早期EE的高估更为明显。mEE与烧伤后天数(r = 0.42,P = 0.004)以及首次EE测量前的手术次数(r = 0.34,P = 0.016)相关,但与烧伤总面积百分比无关(r = 0.02,P = 0.9)。

结论

严重烧伤患者表现出高代谢。在个体水平上观察到的pER与mEE之间的较差一致性表明间接测热法在确定烧伤患者EE方面的价值。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验