Osipova Olesia, Saaya Shoraan, Karpenko Andrei, Zakian Suren, Aboian Edouard
Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Division of Vascular Surgery, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Burlingame, USA.
Vasa. 2019 Nov;48(6):461-471. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000787. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
Cell therapy is proposed for indirect revascularization for the patient's incurable by endovascular or surgical revascularization. The therapy with stem cells (SCs) or progenitor cells is assumed to be more efficient as compared with protein or gene therapy not only because of their direct vasculogenic properties, but also thanks to their paracrine effect via secretion of manifold biologically active substances. This review gives an overview of the potential of SC-based therapy for critical limb ischemia (CLI), putative mechanism underlying cell therapy, and comparison of cell therapy to angiogenesis gene therapy in CLI treatment. Human trial data and meta-analysis, as well as some problems of clinical trials and considerations for future SC-based therapy in CLI are also discussed.
对于无法通过血管内或外科血管重建术治愈的患者,有人提出采用细胞疗法进行间接血管重建。与蛋白质或基因疗法相比,干细胞(SCs)或祖细胞疗法被认为更有效,这不仅是因为它们具有直接的血管生成特性,还得益于它们通过分泌多种生物活性物质产生的旁分泌效应。本文综述了基于干细胞的疗法治疗严重肢体缺血(CLI)的潜力、细胞疗法的潜在机制,以及细胞疗法与CLI治疗中的血管生成基因疗法的比较。还讨论了人体试验数据和荟萃分析,以及临床试验中的一些问题和未来CLI基于干细胞疗法的考虑因素。