Research Department of Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK.
School of Pharmacy, Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan.
BMJ. 2019 Apr 10;365:l1204. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1204.
To investigate the incidence of new onset type 2 diabetes mellitus in men receiving steroid 5α-reductase inhibitors (dutasteride or finasteride) for long term treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Population based cohort study.
UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD; 2003-14) and Taiwanese National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD; 2002-12).
Men in the CPRD who received dutasteride (n=8231), finasteride (n=30 774), or tamsulosin (n=16 270) were evaluated. Propensity score matching (2:1; dutasteride to finasteride or tamsulosin) produced cohorts of 2090, 3445, and 4018, respectively. In the NHIRD, initial numbers were 1251 (dutasteride), 4194 (finasteride), and 86 263 (tamsulosin), reducing to 1251, 2445, and 2502, respectively, after propensity score matching.
Incident type 2 diabetes using a Cox proportional hazard model.
In the CPRD, 2081 new onset type 2 diabetes events (368 dutasteride, 1207 finasteride, and 506 tamsulosin) were recorded during a mean follow-up time of 5.2 years (SD 3.1 years). The event rate per 10 000 person years was 76.2 (95% confidence interval 68.4 to 84.0) for dutasteride, 76.6 (72.3 to 80.9) for finasteride, and 60.3 (55.1 to 65.5) for tamsulosin. There was a modest increased risk of type 2 diabetes for dutasteride (adjusted hazard ratio 1.32, 95% confidence interval 1.08 to 1.61) and finasteride (1.26, 1.10 to 1.45) compared with tamsulosin. Results for the NHIRD were consistent with the findings for the CPRD (adjusted hazard ratio 1.34, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 1.54 for dutasteride, and 1.49, 1.38 to 1.61 for finasteride compared with tamsulosin). Propensity score matched analyses showed similar results.
The risk of developing new onset type 2 diabetes appears to be higher in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia exposed to 5α-reductase inhibitors than in men receiving tamsulosin, but did not differ between men receiving dutasteride and those receiving finasteride. Additional monitoring might be required for men starting these drugs, particularly in those with other risk factors for type 2 diabetes.
研究长期接受甾体 5α-还原酶抑制剂(度他雄胺或非那雄胺)治疗良性前列腺增生的男性中新发 2 型糖尿病的发病率。
基于人群的队列研究。
英国临床实践研究数据链接(CPRD;2003-14 年)和台湾全民健康保险研究数据库(NHIRD;2002-12 年)。
CPRD 中接受度他雄胺(n=8231)、非那雄胺(n=30774)或坦索罗辛(n=16270)治疗的男性接受了评估。采用倾向评分匹配(2:1;度他雄胺与非那雄胺或坦索罗辛),分别产生了 2090、3445 和 4018 个队列。在 NHIRD 中,初始人数分别为 1251(度他雄胺)、4194(非那雄胺)和 86263(坦索罗辛),经倾向评分匹配后分别减少至 1251、2445 和 2502。
使用 Cox 比例风险模型测量新发生的 2 型糖尿病。
在 CPRD 中,在平均 5.2 年(标准差 3.1 年)的随访期间记录了 2081 例新发 2 型糖尿病事件(368 例度他雄胺、1207 例非那雄胺和 506 例坦索罗辛)。每 10000 人年的事件发生率为度他雄胺 76.2(95%置信区间 68.4 至 84.0)、非那雄胺 76.6(72.3 至 80.9)和坦索罗辛 60.3(55.1 至 65.5)。与坦索罗辛相比,度他雄胺(调整后的危险比 1.32,95%置信区间 1.08 至 1.61)和非那雄胺(1.26,1.10 至 1.45)发生 2 型糖尿病的风险略有增加。NHIRD 的结果与 CPRD 的结果一致(与坦索罗辛相比,度他雄胺的调整后危险比为 1.34,95%置信区间为 1.17 至 1.54,非那雄胺为 1.49,1.38 至 1.61)。倾向评分匹配分析显示了类似的结果。
与接受坦索罗辛治疗的男性相比,患有良性前列腺增生并接受 5α-还原酶抑制剂治疗的男性发生新诊断 2 型糖尿病的风险似乎更高,但接受度他雄胺和非那雄胺治疗的男性之间的风险并无差异。可能需要对开始使用这些药物的男性进行额外监测,尤其是那些有 2 型糖尿病其他风险因素的男性。