Radmard Sara, Reid Savina, Ciryam Prajwal, Boubour Alexandra, Ho Nhan, Zucker Jason, Sayre Dean, Greendyke William G, Miko Benjamin A, Pereira Marcus R, Whittier Susan, Green Daniel A, Thakur Kiran T
Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Department of Infection Prevention and Control, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States.
Front Neurol. 2019 Mar 26;10:281. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00281. eCollection 2019.
To assess the clinical utilization and performance of the FilmArray® Meningitis/Encephalitis (ME) multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) panel in a hospital setting. Rapid diagnosis and treatment of central nervous system (CNS) infections are critical to reduce morbidity and mortality. The ME panel is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved rapid multiplex PCR assay that targets 14 bacteria, viruses, and fungi. Previous studies show an overall agreement of 93-99% between the ME panel and conventional diagnostic testing. However, few studies have evaluated the clinical implementation of the ME assay, which is available for routine use at our institution. We performed a single center retrospective chart review of inpatients who underwent ME panel testing from August 2016 to May 2017. Clinical, radiologic, and laboratory data were reviewed to determine the clinical significance of results. Indication for lumbar puncture (LP), time to results of the ME panel, and duration of antimicrobial therapy were evaluated. Seven hundred and five inpatients underwent ME testing, of whom 480 (68.1%) had clinical suspicion for CNS infection with 416 (59.0%) receiving empiric antimicrobial treatment for CNS infection. The median time-to-result of the ME panel was 1.5 h (IQR, 1.4-1.7). Overall agreement between the ME panel results and clinico-laboratory assessment was 98.2%. Forty-five patients tested positive by ME, of which 12 (26.6%) were determined likely to be clinically insignificant. Routine availability of the ME panel led to overutilization of diagnostic test ordering, as demonstrated by the fact that over one-third of ME panel tests performed were ordered for patients with little or no suspicion for CNS infection. The median time from LP to ME panel result was 1.5 h (IQR, 1.4-1.7). The ME panel's rapid turn-around time contributed to the overuse of the test. Approximately one-quarter of positive ME results were deemed clinically insignificant, though the impact of these positive results requires additional evaluation. Twenty-four and forty-eight hours after the ME panel resulted, 68 and 25% of patients started on empiric therapy remained on antibiotics, respectively. The median time from diagnosis to discontinuation and/or narrowing of antibiotic coverage was 25.6 h (IQR, 3.6-42.5). Further consideration of the appropriate indications for use of the ME panel in clinical settings is required.
评估FilmArray®脑膜炎/脑炎(ME)多重聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测板在医院环境中的临床应用情况及性能。中枢神经系统(CNS)感染的快速诊断和治疗对于降低发病率和死亡率至关重要。ME检测板是一种经美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的快速多重PCR检测方法,可检测14种细菌、病毒和真菌。先前的研究表明,ME检测板与传统诊断检测的总体一致性为93%-99%。然而,很少有研究评估ME检测的临床应用情况,而该检测在我们机构可用于常规检测。我们对2016年8月至2017年5月期间接受ME检测板检测的住院患者进行了单中心回顾性病历审查。审查了临床、影像学和实验室数据,以确定检测结果的临床意义。评估了腰椎穿刺(LP)的指征、ME检测板结果的报告时间以及抗菌治疗的持续时间。705名住院患者接受了ME检测,其中480名(68.1%)临床怀疑患有CNS感染,416名(59.0%)接受了针对CNS感染的经验性抗菌治疗。ME检测板的中位报告时间为1.5小时(四分位间距,1.4-1.7)。ME检测板结果与临床实验室评估之间的总体一致性为98.2%。45名患者ME检测呈阳性,其中12名(26.6%)被判定可能临床意义不大。ME检测板的常规可用性导致诊断检测医嘱的过度使用,事实证明,超过三分之一的ME检测板检测是为几乎没有或根本没有CNS感染怀疑的患者开具的。从LP到ME检测板结果的中位时间为1.5小时(四分位间距,1.4-1.7)。ME检测板的快速周转时间导致了该检测的过度使用。尽管这些阳性结果的影响需要进一步评估,但约四分之一的ME阳性结果被认为临床意义不大。ME检测板出结果后24小时和48小时,分别有68%和25%开始接受经验性治疗的患者仍在使用抗生素。从诊断到停止和/或缩小抗生素覆盖范围的中位时间为25.6小时(四分位间距,3.6-42.5)。需要进一步考虑ME检测板在临床环境中的适当使用指征。