Suppr超能文献

患有和未患有自闭症谱系障碍的强迫症患者的认知概况。

The Cognitive Profile of Persons with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder with and without Autism Spectrum Disorder.

作者信息

Ekman Elizabeth, Hiltunen Arto J

机构信息

Department of Social and Psychological Studies, Section of Psychology, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.

出版信息

Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2018 Nov 30;14:304-311. doi: 10.2174/1745017901814010304. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is often comorbid with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD). But to what extent can obsessional symptoms in individuals with ASD be considered "genuinely" comorbid OCD - or are there other mechanisms that are related to ASD? Which mechanisms in OCD with and without ASD share common features? People with ASD have a cognitive profile characterized by "mindblindness"; the antecedent is often referred to in terms of not knowing how to perform or behave and this is the cause of discomfort. This raises the question whether individuals with ASD and comorbid OCD share the same cognitive elements of responsibility interpretation and the same fear of causing harm as individuals who merely have OCD.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study is therefore to evaluate the extent of responsibility interpretation in individuals with OCD alone compared with people experiencing OCD in the context of ASD.

METHODS

Two instruments, the Responsibility Attitude Scale (RAS) and the Responsibility Interpretations Questionnaire (RIQ), were administered to three groups of participants: (i) individuals diagnosed with OCD (n = 32); (ii) individuals with ASD and OCD (n = 19); and (iii) non-clinical control participants (n = 23).

RESULTS

Results indicate significant differences in all measures of responsibility belief (interpretation of obsession and assumption of responsibility) between the OCD-only group and the two other groups.

CONCLUSION

The conclusion is that OCD in people with ASD is not as "genuine" as in people with only OCD, according to cognitive behavioral theory of OCD.

摘要

引言

自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)常与强迫症(OCD)共病。但ASD个体的强迫症状在多大程度上可被视为“真正的”共病强迫症——还是存在与ASD相关的其他机制?有ASD和无ASD的强迫症患者的哪些机制具有共同特征?ASD患者具有以“心智盲”为特征的认知概况;其先兆通常表现为不知道如何行事或表现,这是不适的原因。这就提出了一个问题,即患有ASD和共病OCD的个体与仅患有OCD的个体在责任解释的认知要素和对造成伤害的恐惧方面是否相同。

目的

因此,本研究的目的是评估仅患有OCD的个体与在ASD背景下患有OCD的个体在责任解释方面的程度。

方法

对三组参与者使用了两种工具,即责任态度量表(RAS)和责任解释问卷(RIQ):(i)被诊断患有OCD的个体(n = 32);(ii)患有ASD和OCD的个体(n = 19);以及(iii)非临床对照参与者(n = 23)。

结果

结果表明,仅患有OCD的组与其他两组在所有责任信念测量(强迫观念的解释和责任承担)上存在显著差异。

结论

根据强迫症的认知行为理论,结论是ASD患者的强迫症不如仅患有OCD的患者的强迫症“真实”。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6a2/6407650/0ce3e3dd502a/CPEMH-14-304_F1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验