Ekman Elizabeth, Hiltunen Arto J
Department of Social and Psychological Studies, Section of Psychology, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2018 Nov 30;14:304-311. doi: 10.2174/1745017901814010304. eCollection 2018.
Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is often comorbid with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD). But to what extent can obsessional symptoms in individuals with ASD be considered "genuinely" comorbid OCD - or are there other mechanisms that are related to ASD? Which mechanisms in OCD with and without ASD share common features? People with ASD have a cognitive profile characterized by "mindblindness"; the antecedent is often referred to in terms of not knowing how to perform or behave and this is the cause of discomfort. This raises the question whether individuals with ASD and comorbid OCD share the same cognitive elements of responsibility interpretation and the same fear of causing harm as individuals who merely have OCD.
The aim of the present study is therefore to evaluate the extent of responsibility interpretation in individuals with OCD alone compared with people experiencing OCD in the context of ASD.
Two instruments, the Responsibility Attitude Scale (RAS) and the Responsibility Interpretations Questionnaire (RIQ), were administered to three groups of participants: (i) individuals diagnosed with OCD (n = 32); (ii) individuals with ASD and OCD (n = 19); and (iii) non-clinical control participants (n = 23).
Results indicate significant differences in all measures of responsibility belief (interpretation of obsession and assumption of responsibility) between the OCD-only group and the two other groups.
The conclusion is that OCD in people with ASD is not as "genuine" as in people with only OCD, according to cognitive behavioral theory of OCD.
自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)常与强迫症(OCD)共病。但ASD个体的强迫症状在多大程度上可被视为“真正的”共病强迫症——还是存在与ASD相关的其他机制?有ASD和无ASD的强迫症患者的哪些机制具有共同特征?ASD患者具有以“心智盲”为特征的认知概况;其先兆通常表现为不知道如何行事或表现,这是不适的原因。这就提出了一个问题,即患有ASD和共病OCD的个体与仅患有OCD的个体在责任解释的认知要素和对造成伤害的恐惧方面是否相同。
因此,本研究的目的是评估仅患有OCD的个体与在ASD背景下患有OCD的个体在责任解释方面的程度。
对三组参与者使用了两种工具,即责任态度量表(RAS)和责任解释问卷(RIQ):(i)被诊断患有OCD的个体(n = 32);(ii)患有ASD和OCD的个体(n = 19);以及(iii)非临床对照参与者(n = 23)。
结果表明,仅患有OCD的组与其他两组在所有责任信念测量(强迫观念的解释和责任承担)上存在显著差异。
根据强迫症的认知行为理论,结论是ASD患者的强迫症不如仅患有OCD的患者的强迫症“真实”。