Freischlag Kyle W, Chen Vivian, Nagaraj Shashi K, Chua Annabelle N, Chen Dongfeng, Wigfall Delbert R, Foreman John W, Gbadegesin Rasheed, Vikraman Deepak, Chambers Eileen T
School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Front Pediatr. 2019 Mar 26;7:102. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00102. eCollection 2019.
Currently, there is no standardized approach for determining psychosocial readiness in pediatric transplantation. We examined the utility of the Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates for Transplantation (PACT) to identify pediatric kidney transplant recipients at risk for adverse clinical outcomes. Kidney transplant patients <21-years-old transplanted at Duke University Medical Center between 2005 and 2015 underwent psychosocial assessment by a social worker with either PACT or unstructured interview, which were used to determine transplant candidacy. PACT assessed candidates on a scale of 0 (poor candidate) to 4 (excellent candidate) in areas of social support, psychological health, lifestyle factors, and understanding. Demographics and clinical outcomes were analyzed by presence or absence of PACT and further characterized by high (≥3) and low (≤2) scores. Of 54 pediatric patients, 25 (46.3%) patients underwent pre-transplant evaluation utilizing PACT, while 29 (53.7%) were not evaluated with PACT. Patients assessed with PACT had a significantly lower percentage of acute rejection (16.0 vs. 55.2%, = 0.007). After adjusting for HLA mismatch, a pre-transplant PACT score was persistently associated with lower odds of acute rejection (Odds Ratio 0.119, 95% Confidence Interval 0.027-0.52, = 0.005). In PACT subsection analysis, the lack of family availability (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.97, = 0.047) and risk for psychopathology (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.13-0.87, = 0.025) were associated with a low PACT score and post-transplant non-adherence. Our study highlights the importance of standardized psychosocial assessments and the potential use of PACT in risk stratifying pre-transplant candidates.
目前,尚无用于确定小儿移植患者心理社会准备情况的标准化方法。我们研究了移植候选人心理社会评估(PACT)在识别有不良临床结局风险的小儿肾移植受者方面的效用。2005年至2015年间在杜克大学医学中心接受移植的21岁以下肾移植患者,由一名社会工作者采用PACT或非结构化访谈进行心理社会评估,这些评估用于确定移植候选资格。PACT在社会支持、心理健康、生活方式因素和理解等方面对候选人进行评分,范围从0(差的候选人)到4(优秀的候选人)。根据是否进行PACT评估对人口统计学和临床结局进行分析,并进一步以高(≥3)分和低(≤2)分进行特征描述。在54名小儿患者中,25名(46.3%)患者在移植前利用PACT进行了评估,而29名(53.7%)未接受PACT评估。接受PACT评估的患者急性排斥反应的发生率显著较低(16.0%对55.2%,P = 0.007)。在调整了HLA配型不匹配因素后,移植前PACT评分与急性排斥反应几率较低持续相关(优势比0.119,95%置信区间0.027 - 0.52,P = 0.005)。在PACT子部分分析中,缺乏家庭支持(优势比0.08,95%置信区间0.01 - 0.97,P = 0.047)和精神病理学风险(优势比0.34,95%置信区间0.13 - 0.87,P = 0.025)与低PACT评分及移植后不依从相关。我们的研究强调了标准化心理社会评估的重要性以及PACT在移植前候选者风险分层中的潜在用途。