Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Otolaryngology, Affiliated Putian Hospital, Southern Medical University (Affiliated Hospital of Putian College), Putian, China.
Clin Otolaryngol. 2019 Jul;44(4):572-580. doi: 10.1111/coa.13340. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
The benefits of adding anti-EGFR therapy to conventional chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) remain uncertain, possibly because only a subgroup of patients show better outcome. To address this issue, we compared the efficacy of CRT plus cetuximab (CTX) or nimotuzumab (NTZ) to CRT alone for stage II-IVb NPC and examined possible prognostic indicators, including tumour EGFR and VEGR expression levels.
DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective study enrolled 1812 patients at initial NPC diagnosis at Nanfang Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical University between January 2005 and December 2015. The cetuximab or nimotuzumab plus CRT group (CRT+NTZ/CTX) and the conventional chemoradiotherapy group (CRT) were matched by propensity scoring at 1:5, yielding 282 patients at clinical stage II-IVb with 47 in the CRT+NTZ/CTX group and 235 in the CRT group.
The endpoints of the present study were locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to investigate EGFR and VEGF expression levels in 31 patients of the CRT+NTZ/CTX group.
There were no significant differences in LRFS, DMFS and OS, haematologic toxicity reactions, and gastrointestinal reactions between CRT+NTZ/CTX and CRT groups. There was a positive correlation between EGFR and VEGF expression levels. Among CRT+NTZ/CTX patients, those with high EGFR and VEGF expression levels exhibited better DMFS.
Addition of anti-EGFR to cisplatin-based CRT appears to benefit only a subset of stage II-IVb NPC patients, those with elevated EGFR and VEGF expression levels.
为了确定抗表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)治疗联合常规放化疗(CRT)对鼻咽癌(NPC)的获益是否具有普遍性,我们对比了 NPC Ⅱ-Ⅳb 期患者接受 CRT 联合西妥昔单抗(CTX)或尼妥珠单抗(NTZ)与单纯 CRT 的疗效,并分析了可能的预后指标,包括肿瘤 EGFR 和 VEGF 表达水平。
设计、地点和患者:本回顾性研究纳入了南方医科大学南方医院 2005 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月期间初诊为 NPC 的 1812 例患者。将接受西妥昔单抗或尼妥珠单抗联合 CRT 治疗(CRT+NTZ/CTX 组)与单纯 CRT 治疗(CRT 组)的患者按倾向评分 1:5 匹配,共纳入 282 例Ⅱ-Ⅳb 期患者,其中 CRT+NTZ/CTX 组 47 例,CRT 组 235 例。
本研究的终点包括局部区域无复发生存(LRFS)、无远处转移生存(DMFS)和总生存(OS)。免疫组织化学(IHC)检测了 CRT+NTZ/CTX 组 31 例患者的 EGFR 和 VEGF 表达水平。
两组间 LRFS、DMFS 和 OS、血液学毒性反应和胃肠道反应差异均无统计学意义。EGFR 和 VEGF 表达水平呈正相关。在 CRT+NTZ/CTX 组中,EGFR 和 VEGF 高表达的患者 DMFS 较好。
在基于顺铂的 CRT 基础上添加抗 EGFR 治疗可能仅对部分Ⅱ-Ⅳb 期 NPC 患者有益,这些患者 EGFR 和 VEGF 表达水平较高。