• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内侧单髁膝关节置换术:尽管手术量和使用率存在差异,但患者人口统计学特征日益趋同——来自丹麦膝关节置换登记处的 8501 例病例描述性研究。

Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: increasingly uniform patient demographics despite differences in surgical volume and usage-a descriptive study of 8,501 cases from the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry.

机构信息

a Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Clinical Orthopaedic Research Hvidovre (CORH) , Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre , Denmark ;

b Department of Clinical Epidemiology , Aarhus University Hospital , Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Orthop. 2019 Aug;90(4):354-359. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1601834. Epub 2019 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1080/17453674.2019.1601834
PMID:30973052
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6718175/
Abstract

Background and purpose - Using contemporary indications, up to 50% of patients undergoing knee arthroplasty are eligible for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), and lower UKA use likely reflects a restrictive approach to patient selection. Since broader indications have been successfully introduced, and low surgical volume and UKA percentage (usage) are associated with higher revision rates, it is of interest whether the actual use of UKA has changed accordingly. We explored this by assessing time trends in patient demographics and whether these are associated with center UKA volume and usage. Patients and methods - From the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry, we included 8,501 medial UKAs performed for primary osteoarthritis during 2002-2016. Using locally weighted regression, we examined changes-both overall and by center volume and usage (low vs high)-in sex distribution, age, weight, and preoperative American Knee Society Score (AKSS-O). Results - Over the last 20 years, UKA use in Denmark has been increasing steadily. Age, weight, and proportion of men all increased regardless of volume and usage. AKSS-O showed an initial increase followed by a decrease. In low-usage and low-volume centers, the proportion of women was higher, patients were younger, weighed less, and had higher AKSS-O scores; however, for age and AKSS-O, the groups were converging during the last part of the period. Interpretation - Characteristics of UKA patients have changed in the last 15 years irrespective of center volume and usage. We found between-group differences for both volume and usage, though with convergence for age and AKSS-O, which suggests an increasingly uniform approach to patient selection.

摘要

背景与目的-使用当代的适应证,多达 50%接受膝关节置换术的患者适合进行单髁膝关节置换术(UKA),而 UKA 使用率较低可能反映了对患者选择的限制。由于适应证已经得到了更广泛的应用,并且手术量和 UKA 使用率较低与更高的翻修率相关,因此,我们有兴趣了解 UKA 的实际使用是否相应地发生了变化。我们通过评估患者人口统计学特征的时间趋势以及这些特征是否与中心 UKA 手术量和使用率相关,来探讨这个问题。患者和方法-从丹麦膝关节置换登记处,我们纳入了 2002 年至 2016 年期间因原发性骨关节炎行内侧 UKA 的 8501 例患者。使用局部加权回归,我们检查了整体以及按中心手术量和使用率(低与高)变化的性别分布、年龄、体重和术前美国膝关节协会评分(AKSS-O)。结果-在过去的 20 年中,丹麦的 UKA 使用量一直在稳步增加。无论手术量和使用率如何,年龄、体重和男性比例均有所增加。AKSS-O 最初呈上升趋势,随后下降。在低使用率和低手术量中心,女性比例较高,患者年龄较轻,体重较轻,AKSS-O 评分较高;然而,对于年龄和 AKSS-O,在研究期间的最后一部分,两组之间的差异正在缩小。结论-无论中心手术量和使用率如何,过去 15 年来,UKA 患者的特征都发生了变化。我们发现手术量和使用率都存在组间差异,尽管年龄和 AKSS-O 有趋同趋势,这表明患者选择的方法越来越统一。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af0f/6718175/4312a832bf00/IORT_A_1601834_F0004_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af0f/6718175/d23d06ba67ae/IORT_A_1601834_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af0f/6718175/7fb0b0af3a29/IORT_A_1601834_F0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af0f/6718175/479a1bbbfcb7/IORT_A_1601834_F0003_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af0f/6718175/4312a832bf00/IORT_A_1601834_F0004_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af0f/6718175/d23d06ba67ae/IORT_A_1601834_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af0f/6718175/7fb0b0af3a29/IORT_A_1601834_F0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af0f/6718175/479a1bbbfcb7/IORT_A_1601834_F0003_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af0f/6718175/4312a832bf00/IORT_A_1601834_F0004_C.jpg

相似文献

1
Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: increasingly uniform patient demographics despite differences in surgical volume and usage-a descriptive study of 8,501 cases from the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry.内侧单髁膝关节置换术:尽管手术量和使用率存在差异,但患者人口统计学特征日益趋同——来自丹麦膝关节置换登记处的 8501 例病例描述性研究。
Acta Orthop. 2019 Aug;90(4):354-359. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1601834. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
2
Optimal usage of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 41,986 cases from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.单髁膝关节置换术的最佳应用:对来自英格兰和威尔士国家关节注册中心的41986例病例的研究。
Bone Joint J. 2015 Nov;97-B(11):1506-11. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B11.35551.
3
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty vs Total Knee Arthroplasty for Medial Compartment Arthritis in Patients Older Than 75 Years: Comparable Reoperation, Revision, and Complication Rates.75岁以上患者内侧间室关节炎的单髁膝关节置换术与全膝关节置换术:再手术、翻修及并发症发生率相当
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jun;32(6):1792-1797. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.020. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
4
High usage of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty negatively influences total knee arthroplasty revision rate.高使用率的内侧单髁膝关节置换术会对全膝关节置换术的翻修率产生负面影响。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Sep;30(9):3199-3207. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06650-4. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
5
Optimized medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty outcome: learning from 20 years of propensity score matched registry data.优化的内侧单髁膝关节置换术效果:从 20 年的倾向评分匹配登记数据中学习。
Acta Orthop. 2022 Apr 6;93:390-396. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2022.2265.
6
Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction following revision of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty are as good as a primary total knee arthroplasty.将失败的单髁膝关节置换术翻修为全膝关节置换术后的临床结果和患者满意度与初次全膝关节置换术一样好。
Knee. 2019 Aug;26(4):847-852. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.04.016. Epub 2019 May 18.
7
Revision of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty to Total Knee Arthroplasty: Is It as Good as a Primary Result?单髁膝关节置换翻修为全膝关节置换:其结果是否与初次置换一样好?
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7S):S105-S108. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.023. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
8
Differences in Risk of Revision and Mortality Between Total and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. The Influence of Hospital Volume.全膝关节置换术与单髁膝关节置换术在翻修风险和死亡率方面的差异。医院容量的影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 May;34(5):865-871. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.046. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
9
The Interaction of Caseload and Usage in Determining Outcomes of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.病例数量与使用情况在单髁膝关节置换术预后判定中的相互作用:一项荟萃分析
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Oct;32(10):3228-3237.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.063. Epub 2017 May 11.
10
Outcomes of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty After Aseptic Revision to Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparative Study of 768 TKAs and 578 UKAs Revised to TKAs from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (1994 to 2011).无菌性翻修为全膝关节置换术后单髁膝关节置换术的结果:一项对挪威关节置换登记处(1994年至2011年)768例全膝关节置换术和578例翻修为全膝关节置换术的单髁膝关节置换术的比较研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Mar 16;98(6):431-40. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00499.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing UK arthroplasty surgeons' decision-making between total and medial unicompartmental knee surgery: A vignette-based behavioural experiment.影响英国关节置换外科医生在全膝关节置换术和内侧单髁膝关节置换术之间决策的因素:一项基于病例的行为实验。
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Feb 28;12(1):e70178. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70178. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Champions in usage of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty : The story behind the Danish success.在使用单髁膝关节置换术中的佼佼者:丹麦成功背后的故事。
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2024 Apr;53(4):246-254. doi: 10.1007/s00132-024-04477-8. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
3
Does changes in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty practice pattern influence reasons for revision?

本文引用的文献

1
Usage of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.单髁膝关节置换术的应用
Bone Joint J. 2018 Apr 1;100-B(4):432-435. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B4.BJJ-2017-0716.R1.
2
Hospital volume and the risk of revision in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the Nordic countries -an observational study of 14,496 cases.北欧国家牛津单髁膝关节置换术的医院手术量与翻修风险——一项对14496例病例的观察性研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Sep 7;18(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1750-7.
3
The Interaction of Caseload and Usage in Determining Outcomes of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.
单髁膝关节置换术实践模式的改变是否会影响翻修原因?
Bone Jt Open. 2023 Dec 4;4(12):923-931. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.412.BJO-2023-0096.R1.
4
Prevalence of osteoporosis in patients awaiting unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a cross-sectional study.等待单髁膝关节置换术患者的骨质疏松患病率:一项横断面研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Sep 11;14:1224890. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1224890. eCollection 2023.
5
10-year evolution of day-case hip and knee arthroplasty: a Danish nationwide register study of 166,833 procedures from 2010 to 2020.10 年日间髋膝关节置换术演变:2010 年至 2020 年丹麦全国登记研究的 166833 例手术
Acta Orthop. 2023 Apr 18;94:178-184. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.11961.
6
A well performing medial fixed bearing UKA with promising survivorship at 15 years.表现良好的中置固定平台 UKA,15 年随访生存率高。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 May;143(5):2693-2699. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04562-7. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
7
Medium term results of the cementless Oxford mobile bearing medial unicompartmental knee replacement.非骨水泥固定 Oxford 活动平台型内侧单髁膝关节置换术的中期结果。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 May;33(4):1335-1340. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03289-w. Epub 2022 May 30.
8
Optimized medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty outcome: learning from 20 years of propensity score matched registry data.优化的内侧单髁膝关节置换术效果:从 20 年的倾向评分匹配登记数据中学习。
Acta Orthop. 2022 Apr 6;93:390-396. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2022.2265.
9
Influence of body mass index and age on day-of-surgery discharge, prolonged admission, and 90-day readmission after fast-track unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.体重指数和年龄对快速通道单髁膝关节置换术后当天出院、住院时间延长和 90 天再入院的影响。
Acta Orthop. 2021 Dec;92(6):722-727. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1968727. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
10
Robotic-assisted surgery in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: does it improve the precision of the surgery and its clinical outcomes? Systematic review.机器人辅助手术在膝关节单髁置换术中的应用:是否能提高手术精度及其临床结果?系统评价。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Apr;15(2):165-177. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01162-8. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
病例数量与使用情况在单髁膝关节置换术预后判定中的相互作用:一项荟萃分析
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Oct;32(10):3228-3237.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.063. Epub 2017 May 11.
4
Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark (GLA:D™): evidence-based education and supervised neuromuscular exercise delivered by certified physiotherapists nationwide.丹麦骨关节炎优质生活(GLA:D™):由全国认证物理治疗师提供的循证教育和监督下的神经肌肉锻炼
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Feb 7;18(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1439-y.
5
Evidence-Based Indications for Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in a Consecutive Cohort of Thousand Knees.千例连续膝关节队列中移动平台单髁膝关节置换术的循证指征
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jun;32(6):1779-1785. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.036. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
6
Ten-year patient-reported outcomes following total and minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a propensity score-matched cohort analysis.全膝关节和微创单髁膝关节置换术后 10 年的患者报告结局:倾向评分匹配队列分析。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 May;26(5):1455-1464. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4404-7. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
7
Annual revision rates of partial versus total knee arthroplasty: A comparative meta-analysis.部分膝关节置换术与全膝关节置换术的年度翻修率:一项比较性荟萃分析。
Knee. 2017 Mar;24(2):179-190. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.11.006.
8
Effect of Surgical Caseload on Revision Rate Following Total and Unicompartmental Knee Replacement.全膝关节和单髁膝关节置换术后手术量对翻修率的影响。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Jan 6;98(1):1-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00487.
9
Optimal usage of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 41,986 cases from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.单髁膝关节置换术的最佳应用:对来自英格兰和威尔士国家关节注册中心的41986例病例的研究。
Bone Joint J. 2015 Nov;97-B(11):1506-11. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B11.35551.
10
Patient-reported outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 14,076 matched patients from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.全膝关节置换术和单髁膝关节置换术后患者报告的结局:对来自英格兰和威尔士国家关节注册中心的14076例匹配患者的研究
Bone Joint J. 2015 Jun;97-B(6):793-801. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B6.35155.