• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丹麦公众对器官捐赠和假定同意的辩论:是否正在解决正确的问题?

The public debate on organ donation and presumed consent in Denmark: Are the right issues being addressed?

机构信息

Centre for Medical Science and Technology Studies, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Public Health. 2020 Jul;48(5):480-485. doi: 10.1177/1403494819833797. Epub 2019 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1177/1403494819833797
PMID:30973069
Abstract

The legal framework for organ donation in Denmark is informed consent. But due to the unsatisfactory number of organ donors, Denmark is considering changing legislation to presumed consent. This article discusses the public debate on organ donation and presumed consent in Denmark, and asks whether the right issues are being addressed in the quest towards more available organs and better donor rates? Basing our considerations on the various arguments in the debate and on scientific findings, we question the potential benefits of presumed consent and challenge some of the assumptions and rationalizations that characterize the discussions in Denmark regarding public support, public trust and the role of the family in donation decisions.

摘要

丹麦的器官捐赠法律框架是基于知情同意。但由于器官捐赠者数量不足,丹麦正在考虑修改立法,实行推定同意。本文讨论了丹麦在器官捐赠和推定同意方面的公众辩论,并探讨了在寻求更多可用器官和提高捐赠率的过程中,是否正确处理了权利问题。我们根据辩论中的各种观点和科学发现,对推定同意的潜在好处提出质疑,并对丹麦在公众支持、公众信任以及家庭在捐赠决策中的作用方面的讨论中的一些假设和合理化提出挑战。

相似文献

1
The public debate on organ donation and presumed consent in Denmark: Are the right issues being addressed?丹麦公众对器官捐赠和假定同意的辩论:是否正在解决正确的问题?
Scand J Public Health. 2020 Jul;48(5):480-485. doi: 10.1177/1403494819833797. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
2
A systematic review of presumed consent systems for deceased organ donation.对已故器官捐赠的推定同意系统的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2009 May;13(26):iii, ix-xi, 1-95. doi: 10.3310/hta13260.
3
Impact of presumed consent for organ donation on donation rates: a systematic review.器官捐赠的推定同意对捐赠率的影响:一项系统评价。
BMJ. 2009 Jan 14;338:a3162. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a3162.
4
Presumed consent legislation failed to improve organ donation in Chile.推定同意法未能改善智利的器官捐献情况。
Transplant Proc. 2013 May;45(4):1316-7. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.01.008.
5
Presumed Dissent? Opt-out Organ Donation and the Exclusion of Organs and Tissues.疑似异议?选择退出式器官捐赠与器官和组织的排除
Med Law Rev. 2022 May 30;30(2):268-298. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwac001.
6
[An ethical evaluation of presumed consent for organ donation in Switzerland].[瑞士器官捐赠推定同意的伦理评估]
Rev Med Suisse. 2020 Feb 19;16(682):370-373.
7
Presumed consent for organ donation: is Romania prepared for it?器官捐赠的推定同意:罗马尼亚对此做好准备了吗?
Transplant Proc. 2010 Jan-Feb;42(1):144-6. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.12.006.
8
Informing the debate: rates of kidney transplantation in nations with presumed consent.为辩论提供信息:假定同意国家的肾脏移植率。
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Nov 16;153(10):641-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-10-201011160-00006.
9
Doctor and patient groups vote for presumed consent.
Lancet. 1999 Jul 17;354(9174):230. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66303-9.
10
Does Presumed Consent Save Lives? Evidence from Europe.推定同意能挽救生命吗?来自欧洲的证据。
Health Econ. 2015 Dec;24(12):1560-72. doi: 10.1002/hec.3111. Epub 2014 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Global legislation regulating the donation, procurement and distribution processes of organs and tissues from deceased donors for transplants: A scoping review.规范已故捐赠者器官和组织用于移植的捐赠、获取和分配流程的全球立法:一项范围综述。
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 11;10(4):e26313. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26313. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.
2
Impact of donor lung quality on post-transplant recipient outcome in the Lung Allocation Score era in Eurotransplant - a historical prospective study.在 Eurotransplant 的 Lung Allocation Score 时代,供肺质量对移植后受者结局的影响 - 一项历史前瞻性研究。
Transpl Int. 2020 May;33(5):544-554. doi: 10.1111/tri.13582. Epub 2020 Feb 13.