• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A randomized controlled trial on the blood pressure-lowering effect of amlodipine and nifedipine-GITS in sustained hypertension.硝苯地平控释片与氨氯地平治疗持续性高血压的降压疗效随机对照试验
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019 May;21(5):648-657. doi: 10.1111/jch.13543. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
2
Comparative effects of felodipine ER, amlodipine and nifedipine GITS on 24 h blood pressure control and trough to peak ratios in mild to moderate ambulatory hypertension: a forced titration study.非洛地平缓释片、氨氯地平和硝苯地平控释片对轻至中度动态高血压患者24小时血压控制及谷峰比值的比较效应:一项强制滴定研究。
Can J Cardiol. 1998 May;14(5):682-8.
3
A randomized multicenter study on ambulatory blood pressure and arterial stiffness in patients treated with valsartan/amlodipine or nifedipine GITS.一项关于缬沙坦/氨氯地平或硝苯地平控释片治疗患者的动态血压和动脉僵硬度的随机多中心研究。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019 Feb;21(2):252-261. doi: 10.1111/jch.13457. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
4
Comparative effects of amlodipine and nifedipine GITS during treatment and after missing two doses.氨氯地平和硝苯地平控释片在治疗期间及漏服两剂后的对比效果。
Blood Press Monit. 2001 Feb;6(1):47-57. doi: 10.1097/00126097-200102000-00008.
5
Comparison of the efficacy of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers in African American patients with hypertension. ISHIB Investigators Group. International Society on Hypertension in Blacks.二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂在非裔美国高血压患者中的疗效比较。ISHIB研究组。黑人高血压国际协会。
Arch Intern Med. 1998 Oct 12;158(18):2029-34. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.18.2029.
6
Persistence of the antihypertensive efficacy of amlodipine and nifedipine GITS after two 'missed doses': a randomised, double-blind comparative trial in Asian patients.氨氯地平和硝苯地平控释片在两次“漏服剂量”后降压疗效的持续性:一项针对亚洲患者的随机、双盲对照试验
J Hum Hypertens. 2002 Nov;16(11):805-13. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001485.
7
Restoration of nocturnal dip in blood pressure is associated with improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction. A 1-year clinical study comparing the effects of amlodipine and nifedipine retard on ambulatory blood pressure and left ventricular systolic function in Chinese hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients.夜间血压下降的恢复与左心室射血分数的改善相关。一项为期1年的临床研究,比较氨氯地平和硝苯地平缓释片对中国2型糖尿病高血压患者动态血压和左心室收缩功能的影响。
Int J Cardiol. 2003 Jun;89(2-3):159-66. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5273(02)00450-3.
8
Dose- and administration time-dependent effects of nifedipine gits on ambulatory blood pressure in hypertensive subjects.硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统对高血压患者动态血压的剂量及给药时间依赖性效应。
Chronobiol Int. 2007;24(3):471-93. doi: 10.1080/07420520701420683.
9
Quality of life and calcium channel blockade with nifedipine GITS versus amlodipine in hypertensive patients in Spain. Gastrointestinal Therapeutic System.西班牙高血压患者使用硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统与氨氯地平进行钙通道阻滞治疗时的生活质量对比。胃肠道治疗系统
J Hypertens. 1998 Dec;16(12 Pt 1):1839-47. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199816120-00018.
10
Efficacy, tolerability, and quality of life of losartan, alone or with hydrochlorothiazide, versus nifedipine GITS in patients with essential hypertension.氯沙坦单独或与氢氯噻嗪联用与硝苯地平控释片治疗原发性高血压患者的疗效、耐受性及生活质量比较
Clin Ther. 1996 May-Jun;18(3):411-28. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(96)80022-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Personalized Antihypertensive Treatment Optimization With Smartphone-Enabled Remote Precision Dosing of Amlodipine During the COVID-19 Pandemic (PERSONAL-CovidBP Trial).新冠疫情期间通过启用智能手机的氨氯地平远程精准给药实现个性化高血压治疗优化(PERSONAL-CovidBP试验)
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Feb 20;13(4):e030749. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030749. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
2
Application of metabolomics in the diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and the treatment of traditional Chinese medicine.代谢组学在非酒精性脂肪性肝病诊断及中医药治疗中的应用
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Aug 25;13:971561. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.971561. eCollection 2022.
3
Evaluation of commonly used cardiovascular drugs in inhibiting vonoprazan metabolism and .常用心血管药物对沃克帕唑代谢的抑制作用评估及…… (原文结尾不完整)
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Aug 16;13:909168. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.909168. eCollection 2022.
4
Comparative efficacy of generic nifedipine versus brand-name amlodipine for hypertension management in Taiwan.比较硝苯地平 generic 与氨氯地平 brand-name 在台湾地区高血压管理中的疗效。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2022 Jul;24(7):870-877. doi: 10.1111/jch.14521. Epub 2022 Jun 8.

本文引用的文献

1
A randomized multicenter study on ambulatory blood pressure and arterial stiffness in patients treated with valsartan/amlodipine or nifedipine GITS.一项关于缬沙坦/氨氯地平或硝苯地平控释片治疗患者的动态血压和动脉僵硬度的随机多中心研究。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019 Feb;21(2):252-261. doi: 10.1111/jch.13457. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
2
No pharmacokinetic interactions between candesartan and amlodipine following multiple oral administrations in healthy subjects.在健康受试者多次口服坎地沙坦和氨氯地平后,二者之间不存在药代动力学相互作用。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2018 Aug 10;12:2475-2483. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S172568. eCollection 2018.
3
Ten-year changes in ambulatory blood pressure: The prognostic value of ambulatory pulse pressure.十年间动态血压变化:动态脉压的预后价值。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018 Sep;20(9):1230-1237. doi: 10.1111/jch.13344. Epub 2018 Jul 7.
4
Efficacy and tolerability of initial high vs low doses of S-(-)-amlodipine in hypertension.高血压患者初始高剂量与低剂量左旋氨氯地平的疗效及耐受性比较
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2017 Oct;19(10):973-982. doi: 10.1111/jch.13022. Epub 2017 May 30.
5
Comparison of bisoprolol to a metoprolol CR/ZOK tablet for control of heart rate and blood pressure in mild-to-moderate hypertensive patients: the CREATIVE study.比索洛尔与美托洛尔控释/缓释片治疗轻至中度高血压患者心率和血压的比较:CREATIVE研究
Hypertens Res. 2017 Jan;40(1):79-86. doi: 10.1038/hr.2016.101. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
6
Blood pressure variability and cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.血压变异性与心血管疾病:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ. 2016 Aug 9;354:i4098. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4098.
7
Effectiveness and content analysis of interventions to enhance medication adherence in hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.提高高血压患者药物依从性干预措施的有效性及内容分析:一项系统评价与荟萃分析方案
Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 7;5:96. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0278-5.
8
2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).2013年欧洲高血压学会(ESH)和欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)动脉高血压管理指南:欧洲高血压学会(ESH)和欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)动脉高血压管理特别工作组
Eur Heart J. 2013 Jul;34(28):2159-219. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht151. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
9
Long-acting dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers and sympathetic nervous system activity in hypertension: a literature review comparing amlodipine and nifedipine GITS.长效二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂与高血压患者的交感神经系统活性:一项比较氨氯地平和硝苯地平控释片的文献综述
Blood Press. 2012 Jul;21 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):3-10. doi: 10.3109/08037051.2012.690615. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
10
Once daily nifedipine: the formulation dictates the pharmacokinetic characteristics and the therapeutic responses.硝苯地平每日一次给药:制剂决定药代动力学特征和治疗反应。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Mar;50(3):202-17. doi: 10.5414/cp201603.

硝苯地平控释片与氨氯地平治疗持续性高血压的降压疗效随机对照试验

A randomized controlled trial on the blood pressure-lowering effect of amlodipine and nifedipine-GITS in sustained hypertension.

机构信息

Centre for Epidemiological Studies and Clinical Trials, The Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Hypertension, Department of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Jiangsu Province Hospital for Governmental Employees, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019 May;21(5):648-657. doi: 10.1111/jch.13543. Epub 2019 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1111/jch.13543
PMID:30973207
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8030393/
Abstract

In a multicenter, randomized trial, we investigated whether the long half-time dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker amlodipine was more efficacious than the gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) formulation of nifedipine in lowering ambulatory blood pressure (BP) in sustained hypertension (clinic systolic/diastolic BP 140-179/90-109 mm Hg and 24-hour systolic/diastolic BP ≥ 130/80 mm Hg). Eligible patients were randomly assigned to amlodipine 5-10 mg/day or nifedipine-GITS 30-60 mg/day. Ambulatory BP monitoring was performed for 24 hours at baseline and 4-week treatment and for 48 hours at 8-week treatment with a dose of medication missed on the second day. After 8-week treatment, BP was similarly reduced in the amlodipine (n = 257) and nifedipine-GITS groups (n = 248) for both clinic and ambulatory (24-hour systolic/diastolic BP 10.3/6.5 vs 10.9/6.3 mm Hg, P ≥ 0.24) measurements. However, after missing a dose of medication, ambulatory BP reductions were greater in the amlodipine than nifedipine-GITS group, with a significant (P ≤ 0.04) between-group difference in 24-hour (-1.2 mm Hg) and daytime diastolic BP (-1.5 mm Hg). In conclusion, amlodipine and nifedipine-GITS were efficacious in reducing 24-hour BP. When a dose of medication was missed, amlodipine became more efficacious than nifedipine-GITS.

摘要

在一项多中心、随机试验中,我们研究了长半衰期二氢吡啶钙通道阻滞剂氨氯地平是否比硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统(GITS)制剂更能有效降低持续性高血压患者的动态血压(诊室收缩/舒张压 140-179/90-109mmHg 和 24 小时收缩/舒张压≥130/80mmHg)。符合条件的患者被随机分配到氨氯地平 5-10mg/天或硝苯地平-GITS 30-60mg/天。在基线和治疗 4 周时进行 24 小时动态血压监测,并在错过第二天药物剂量的情况下在治疗 8 周时进行 48 小时监测。在 8 周治疗后,氨氯地平组(n=257)和硝苯地平-GITS 组(n=248)的诊室和动态(24 小时收缩/舒张压 10.3/6.5 与 10.9/6.3mmHg,P≥0.24)血压均有类似降低。然而,错过一次药物剂量后,氨氯地平组的动态血压降低幅度大于硝苯地平-GITS 组,24 小时(-1.2mmHg)和白天舒张压(-1.5mmHg)的组间差异具有统计学意义(P≤0.04)。总之,氨氯地平和硝苯地平-GITS 均能有效降低 24 小时血压。当错过一次药物剂量时,氨氯地平的疗效优于硝苯地平-GITS。