• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂在非裔美国高血压患者中的疗效比较。ISHIB研究组。黑人高血压国际协会。

Comparison of the efficacy of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers in African American patients with hypertension. ISHIB Investigators Group. International Society on Hypertension in Blacks.

作者信息

Hall W D, Reed J W, Flack J M, Yunis C, Preisser J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 1998 Oct 12;158(18):2029-34. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.18.2029.

DOI:10.1001/archinte.158.18.2029
PMID:9778203
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is a prevalent disease among African Americans, and successful treatment rates are low. Since calcium channel blockers are well-tolerated and efficacious in African Americans, we undertook this study to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 3 commonly prescribed calcium channel blockers: amlodipine besylate (Norvasc), nifedipine coat core (CC) (Adalat CC), and nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) (Procardia XL).

METHODS

One hundred ninety-two hypertensive patients across 10 study centers were randomly assigned to double-blind monotherapy with amlodipine besylate (5 mg/d), nifedipine CC (30 mg/d), or nifedipine GITS (30 mg/d) for 8 weeks. Patients not achieving therapeutic response after 4 weeks had their dose doubled for the next 4 weeks. The primary end point was a comparison of the average reduction (week 8 minus baseline) in 24-hour ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Secondary end points included a comparison of average 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP), office SBP or DBP reduction, responder rates, safety, and tolerability.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-three patients were evaluable for efficacy after 8 weeks. There was no significant difference in the average 24-hour ambulatory DBP (-8.5, -9.0, and -6.1 mm Hg, respectively) or SBP (-14.3, -15.7, and -11.8 mm Hg, respectively) reduction. Average office SBP and DBP were reduced to a comparable degree (19-22 mm Hg [P =.50] and 12-14 mm Hg [P =.51], respectively). Responder rates (DBP <90 or reduced by > or = 10 mm Hg) were similar (P = .38). Discontinuation rates and adverse event frequency were distributed similarly across the 3 treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the 3 dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers are equivalent in African Americans with stages 1 and 2 hypertension.

摘要

背景

高血压在非裔美国人中是一种常见疾病,且成功治疗率较低。由于钙通道阻滞剂在非裔美国人中耐受性良好且疗效显著,我们开展了这项研究,以比较三种常用钙通道阻滞剂的疗效、安全性和耐受性:苯磺酸氨氯地平(络活喜)、硝苯地平控释片(拜新同)和硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统制剂(心痛定控释片)。

方法

来自10个研究中心的192例高血压患者被随机分配,接受苯磺酸氨氯地平(5毫克/天)、硝苯地平控释片(30毫克/天)或硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统制剂(30毫克/天)的双盲单药治疗,为期8周。4周后未达到治疗反应的患者,在接下来的4周内将剂量加倍。主要终点是比较24小时动态舒张压(DBP)的平均降低值(第8周减去基线值)。次要终点包括比较24小时动态收缩压(SBP)的平均值、诊室SBP或DBP的降低值、有效率、安全性和耐受性。

结果

8周后有163例患者可进行疗效评估。24小时动态DBP的平均降低值(分别为-8.5、-9.0和-6.1毫米汞柱)或SBP的平均降低值(分别为-14.3、-15.7和-11.8毫米汞柱)无显著差异。诊室SBP和DBP的平均值降低程度相当(分别为19 - 22毫米汞柱[P = 0.50]和12 - 14毫米汞柱[P = 0.51])。有效率(DBP <90或降低≥10毫米汞柱)相似(P = 0.38)。停药率和不良事件发生率在3个治疗组中的分布相似。

结论

三种二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂在1级和2级高血压非裔美国人中的疗效、安全性和耐受性相当。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the efficacy of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers in African American patients with hypertension. ISHIB Investigators Group. International Society on Hypertension in Blacks.二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂在非裔美国高血压患者中的疗效比较。ISHIB研究组。黑人高血压国际协会。
Arch Intern Med. 1998 Oct 12;158(18):2029-34. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.18.2029.
2
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of nifedipine coat-core versus amlodipine in the treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Hypertension Study Group.硝苯地平控释片与氨氯地平治疗轻至中度原发性高血压患者的疗效和安全性比较。高血压研究组。
Clin Ther. 1995 Jul-Aug;17(4):686-700. doi: 10.1016/0149-2918(95)80045-x.
3
A study of losartan, alone or with hydrochlorothiazide vs nifedipine GITS in elderly patients with diastolic hypertension.一项关于氯沙坦单独使用或与氢氯噻嗪联用对比硝苯地平控释片治疗老年舒张期高血压患者的研究。
J Hum Hypertens. 1998 Oct;12(10):693-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000687.
4
An 18-week, prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of amlodipine/ramipril combination versus amlodipine monotherapy in the treatment of hypertension: the assessment of combination therapy of amlodipine/ramipril (ATAR) study.氨氯地平/雷米普利联合用药与氨氯地平单药治疗高血压的18周前瞻性随机双盲多中心研究:氨氯地平/雷米普利联合治疗评估(ATAR)研究
Clin Ther. 2008 Sep;30(9):1618-28. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.09.008.
5
Results of a phase III, 8-week, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial to assess the effects of amlodipine camsylate versus amlodipine besylate in Korean adults with mild to moderate hypertension.一项三期、为期8周、多中心、前瞻性、随机、双盲、平行组临床试验的结果,该试验旨在评估坎地沙坦酯与苯磺酸氨氯地平对韩国轻至中度高血压成年人的疗效。
Clin Ther. 2007 Sep;29(9):1924-36. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.09.018.
6
A randomized controlled trial on the blood pressure-lowering effect of amlodipine and nifedipine-GITS in sustained hypertension.硝苯地平控释片与氨氯地平治疗持续性高血压的降压疗效随机对照试验
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019 May;21(5):648-657. doi: 10.1111/jch.13543. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
7
Efficacy, tolerability, and quality of life of losartan, alone or with hydrochlorothiazide, versus nifedipine GITS in patients with essential hypertension.氯沙坦单独或与氢氯噻嗪联用与硝苯地平控释片治疗原发性高血压患者的疗效、耐受性及生活质量比较
Clin Ther. 1996 May-Jun;18(3):411-28. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(96)80022-1.
8
Comparative effects of felodipine ER, amlodipine and nifedipine GITS on 24 h blood pressure control and trough to peak ratios in mild to moderate ambulatory hypertension: a forced titration study.非洛地平缓释片、氨氯地平和硝苯地平控释片对轻至中度动态高血压患者24小时血压控制及谷峰比值的比较效应:一项强制滴定研究。
Can J Cardiol. 1998 May;14(5):682-8.
9
Antihypertensive efficacy and safety of manidipine versus amlodipine in elderly subjects with isolated systolic hypertension: MAISH study.马尼地平与氨氯地平治疗老年单纯收缩期高血压的降压疗效及安全性:MAISH研究
Clin Drug Investig. 2007;27(9):623-32. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200727090-00004.
10
Clinic blood pressure responses to two amlodipine salt formulations, adipate and besylate, in adult Korean patients with mild to moderate hypertension: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, 8-week comparison.韩国成年轻至中度高血压患者对两种氨氯地平盐制剂(己二酸盐和苯磺酸盐)的临床血压反应:一项多中心、随机、双盲、平行组、为期8周的比较研究。
Clin Ther. 2005 Jun;27(6):728-39. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.06.011.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and tolerability of a switch to fixed-dose combination therapy with amlodipine besylate/benazepril hydrochloride after monotherapy with amlodipine besylate: Data from the African-American subpopulation of a practice-based, open-label study (the LOGIC study).苯磺酸氨氯地平单药治疗后换用苯磺酸氨氯地平/盐酸贝那普利固定剂量联合治疗的疗效和耐受性:来自一项基于实践的开放标签研究(LOGIC研究)的非裔美国亚组数据。
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2004 Mar;65(2):138-48. doi: 10.1016/S0011-393X(04)90028-8.
2
Combination therapy with renin-angiotensin system blockers: will amlodipine replace hydrochlorothiazide?肾素-血管紧张素系统阻滞剂联合治疗:氨氯地平会取代氢氯噻嗪吗?
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2007 Aug;9(4):284-90. doi: 10.1007/s11906-007-0052-0.
3
Modified-release nifedipine: a review of the use of modified-release formulations in the treatment of hypertension and angina pectoris.
缓释硝苯地平:关于缓释制剂在高血压和心绞痛治疗中应用的综述
Drugs. 2006;66(4):497-528. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200666040-00007.
4
Gastrointestinal safety of an extended-release, nondeformable, oral dosage form (OROS: a retrospective study.一种缓释、不可变形口服剂型(OROS)的胃肠道安全性:一项回顾性研究
Drug Saf. 2002;25(14):1021-33. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200225140-00004.
5
Hypertensive cardiovascular disease in African Americans.非裔美国人的高血压性心血管疾病。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 1999 Dec;1(6):521-8. doi: 10.1007/s11906-996-0025-8.
6
Renal artery stenosis as a cause of renal impairment: implications for treatment of hypertension and congestive heart failure.肾动脉狭窄作为肾功能损害的一个原因:对高血压和充血性心力衰竭治疗的影响。
J R Soc Med. 1999 Oct;92(10):505-10. doi: 10.1177/014107689909201004.