From the Department of Nutrition and Integrative Physiology.
Department of Internal Medicine.
ASAIO J. 2020 Mar;66(3):291-299. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001001.
Current continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) decrease peripheral vascular pulsatility, which may contribute to side effects such as bleeding and thrombotic events. However, the actual impact of manipulating LVAD pump speed, revolutions per minute (rpm), on peripheral (brachial) pulsatility index (brachial PI), in patients with heart failure implanted with a HeartWare (HVAD) or HeartMateII (HMII) LVAD is unknown. Therefore, blood velocities (Doppler ultrasound) in the brachial artery were recorded and brachial PI calculated across rpm manipulations which spanned the acceptable clinical outpatient range: 360 rpm (HVAD, n = 10) and 1200 rpm (HMII, n = 10). Left ventricular assist device-derived PIs were also recorded: HVAD maximal blood flow (HVADV max), HVAD minimum blood flow (HVADV min), and HMII PI (HMIIPI). Brachial PI changed significantly with rpm manipulations, from 2.3 ± 0.6 to 4.1 ± 0.8 (HVAD) and from 1.8 ± 0.5 to 3.6 ± 1.0 (HMII). Multilevel linear modeling with random intercepts revealed a 180 rpm decrease of the HVAD resulted in a 0.9 ± 0.1 (37 ± 4%, d = 2.65) increase in brachial PI and a 600 rpm decrease in the HMII resulted in a 0.8 ± 0.1 (38 ± 3%, d = 4.66) increase. Furthermore, a reduction in rpm resulted in a 20.0 ± 0.3% power savings, and a reduction in device reported blood flow of 9 ± 1%. Brachial PI was linearly related to HVADV max, HVADV min, their difference (R = 0.42, R = 0.65, and R = 0.54, respectively), and HMIIPI (R = 0.86). Manipulating LVAD pump speed, within a clinically acceptable outpatient range, resulted in a significant change in brachial PI, which was reflected by pump indices, documenting the potential for LVAD pump speed manipulations to improve LVAD outcomes.
目前的连续血流左心室辅助装置(LVAD)降低了外周血管搏动性,这可能导致出血和血栓形成等副作用。然而,操纵 LVAD 泵速、每分钟转数(rpm)对心力衰竭植入 HeartWare(HVAD)或 HeartMateII(HMII)LVAD 患者外周(肱动脉)搏动指数(brachial PI)的实际影响尚不清楚。因此,在可接受的临床门诊范围内,跨越 rpm 操纵记录肱动脉的血流速度(多普勒超声)并计算 brachial PI:HVAD 为 360 rpm(n = 10)和 HMII 为 1200 rpm(n = 10)。还记录了 LVAD 衍生的 PI:HVAD 最大血流(HVADV max)、HVAD 最小血流(HVADV min)和 HMII PI(HMIIPI)。肱动脉 PI 随 rpm 操纵显著变化,从 2.3 ± 0.6 增加到 4.1 ± 0.8(HVAD)和从 1.8 ± 0.5 增加到 3.6 ± 1.0(HMII)。具有随机截距的多级线性模型显示,HVAD 减少 180 rpm 会导致 brachial PI 增加 0.9 ± 0.1(37 ± 4%,d = 2.65),HMII 减少 600 rpm 会导致 brachial PI 增加 0.8 ± 0.1(38 ± 3%,d = 4.66)。此外,rpm 的降低导致功率节省 20.0 ± 0.3%,设备报告的血流减少 9 ± 1%。肱动脉 PI 与 HVADV max、HVADV min、它们的差值呈线性相关(R = 0.42、R = 0.65 和 R = 0.54)和 HMIIPI(R = 0.86)。在临床可接受的门诊范围内操纵 LVAD 泵速会导致 brachial PI 显著变化,这反映在泵指数上,证明 LVAD 泵速操纵有可能改善 LVAD 结果。