• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在美国普通人群中对广泛性焦虑和/或惊恐障碍发病的国际风险预测算法(Predict A)进行外部验证。

External validation of the International Risk Prediction Algorithm for the onset of generalized anxiety and/or panic syndromes (The Predict A) in the US general population.

机构信息

Institute of Mental Health Research, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.

Institute of Mental Health Research, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

J Anxiety Disord. 2019 May;64:40-44. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2019.03.004
PMID:30974236
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Multivariable risk prediction algorithms are useful for making clinical decisions and health planning. While prediction algorithms for new onset of anxiety disorders in Europe and elsewhere have been developed, the performance of these algorithms in the Americas is not known. The objective of this study was to validate the PredictA algorithm for new onset of anxiety and/or panic disorders in the US general population.

METHODS

Longitudinal study design was conducted with approximate 2-year follow-up data from a total of 24 626 individuals who participated in Wave 1 and 2 of the US National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC) and who did not have generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and panic disorder in the past year at Wave 1. The PredictA algorithm was directly applied to the selected participants.

RESULTS

Among the participants, 5.4% developed GAD and/or panic disorder over two years. The PredictA algorithm had a discriminative power (C-statistics = 0.62, 95%CI: 0.61; 0.64), but poor calibration (p < 0.001) with the NESARC data. The observed and the mean predicted risk of GAD and/or panic disorders in the NESARC were 5.3% and 3.6%, respectively. Particularly, the observed and predicted risks of GAD and/or panic disorders in the highest decile of risk score in the NESARC participants were 13.3% and 10.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The PredictA algorithm has acceptable discrimination, but the calibration with the NESARC data was poor. The PredictA algorithm is likely to underestimate the risk of GAD/panic disorders in the US population. Therefore, the use of PredictA in the US general population for predicting individual risk of GAD and/or panic disorders is not encouraged.

摘要

简介

多变量风险预测算法可用于做出临床决策和健康规划。虽然已经开发出用于预测欧洲和其他地区新发焦虑障碍的算法,但这些算法在美洲的性能尚不清楚。本研究的目的是验证 PredictA 算法在美国普通人群中新发焦虑和/或恐慌障碍的预测能力。

方法

采用纵向研究设计,对总共 24626 名参加了美国全国酒精相关情况流行病学调查(NESARC)第 1 波和第 2 波、且在第 1 波时过去 1 年中没有广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)和恐慌障碍的个体进行了为期约 2 年的随访数据。直接将 PredictA 算法应用于所选参与者。

结果

在参与者中,5.4%在两年内患上 GAD 和/或恐慌障碍。PredictA 算法具有判别能力(C 统计量=0.62,95%CI:0.61;0.64),但与 NESARC 数据的校准效果较差(p<0.001)。在 NESARC 中观察到的和平均预测的 GAD 和/或恐慌障碍风险分别为 5.3%和 3.6%。特别是,在 NESARC 参与者中风险评分最高的十分位数中观察到的和预测的 GAD 和/或恐慌障碍风险分别为 13.3%和 10.4%。

结论

PredictA 算法具有可接受的判别能力,但与 NESARC 数据的校准效果较差。PredictA 算法可能低估了美国人群中 GAD/恐慌障碍的风险。因此,不鼓励在美国普通人群中使用 PredictA 来预测个体 GAD 和/或恐慌障碍的风险。

相似文献

1
External validation of the International Risk Prediction Algorithm for the onset of generalized anxiety and/or panic syndromes (The Predict A) in the US general population.在美国普通人群中对广泛性焦虑和/或惊恐障碍发病的国际风险预测算法(Predict A)进行外部验证。
J Anxiety Disord. 2019 May;64:40-44. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
2
External validation of the international risk prediction algorithm for major depressive episode in the US general population: the PredictD-US study.美国普通人群中重度抑郁发作国际风险预测算法的外部验证:PredictD-US研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Jul 22;16:256. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0971-x.
3
An international risk prediction algorithm for the onset of generalized anxiety and panic syndromes in general practice attendees: predictA.在普通诊所就诊者中出现广泛性焦虑和恐慌综合征的国际风险预测算法:predictA。
Psychol Med. 2011 Aug;41(8):1625-39. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710002400. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
4
A prediction algorithm for first onset of major depression in the general population: development and validation.一般人群中首次发生重度抑郁症的预测算法:开发与验证
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 May;68(5):418-24. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-202845. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
5
Development and validation of a risk-prediction algorithm for the recurrence of panic disorder.惊恐障碍复发风险预测算法的开发与验证
Depress Anxiety. 2015 May;32(5):341-8. doi: 10.1002/da.22359. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
6
Relationship between major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder and coronary artery disease in the US general population.美国普通人群中重度抑郁症、广泛性焦虑症与冠状动脉疾病的关系。
J Psychosom Res. 2019 Apr;119:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
7
Correlates of treatment-seeking in DSM-5 generalized anxiety disorder: Findings from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III.DSM-5 广泛性焦虑障碍患者寻求治疗的相关因素:来自国家酒精和相关条件流行病学调查-III 的研究结果。
J Anxiety Disord. 2024 Aug;106:102909. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102909. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
8
Age at onset of generalized anxiety disorder in older adults.老年人广泛性焦虑障碍的起病年龄。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009 Jun;17(6):455-64. doi: 10.1097/jgp.0b013e31818f3a93.
9
Risk factors for the onset of panic and generalised anxiety disorders in the general adult population: a systematic review of cohort studies.普通成年人群中惊恐障碍和广泛性焦虑障碍发病的危险因素:队列研究的系统评价
J Affect Disord. 2014 Oct;168:337-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.06.021. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
10
Probability and predictors of first treatment contact for anxiety disorders in the United States: analysis of data from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC).美国焦虑障碍首次治疗接触的概率和预测因素:来自国家酒精相关情况流行病学调查(NESARC)的数据分析。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;74(11):1093-100. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08361.

引用本文的文献

1
An explainable predictive model for anxiety symptoms risk among Chinese older adults with abdominal obesity using a machine learning and SHapley Additive exPlanations approach.一种使用机器学习和SHapley加法解释方法的、用于预测中国腹部肥胖老年人焦虑症状风险的可解释预测模型。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 10;15:1451703. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1451703. eCollection 2024.
2
Preventive psychiatry: a blueprint for improving the mental health of young people.预防性精神病学:改善年轻人心理健康的蓝图。
World Psychiatry. 2021 Jun;20(2):200-221. doi: 10.1002/wps.20869.
3
Implementing Precision Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Individualized Prediction Models for Clinical Practice.
实施精准精神病学:个体化预测模型在临床实践中的系统评价。
Schizophr Bull. 2021 Mar 16;47(2):284-297. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaa120.