Suppr超能文献

医疗保健转型:英国四个卫生系统中服务重新配置的政策和政治。

Transforming health care: the policy and politics of service reconfiguration in the UK's four health systems.

机构信息

Centre for Biomedicine, Self & Society, Usher Institute, Old Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, EdinburghEH8 9AG, UK.

School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, Michigan48109-2029, USA.

出版信息

Health Econ Policy Law. 2020 Jul;15(3):289-307. doi: 10.1017/S1744133119000148. Epub 2019 Apr 12.

Abstract

Public involvement in service change has been identified as a key facilitator of health care transformation (Foley et al., 2017) but little is known about how health policy influences whether and how organisations involve the public in change processes. This qualitative study compares policy and practice for involving the public in major service changes across the UK's four health systems (England, Northern Ireland, Wales and Scotland). We analysed policy documents, and conducted interviews with officials, stakeholders, NHS staff and public campaigners (total number of interviewees = 47). Involving the public in major service change was acknowledged as a policy challenge in all four systems. Despite ostensible similarities, there were some clear differences between the four health systems' processes for involving patients and the public in major changes to health services. The extent of central Government oversight, the prescriptiveness of Government guidance, the role for intermediary bodies and arrangements for independent scrutiny of contentious decisions all vary. We analyse how health policy in the four systems has used 'sticks' and 'sermons' to promote particular approaches, and conclude that both policy and the wider system context within which health care organisations try to effect change are significant, and understudied aspect of contemporary practice.

摘要

公众参与服务变革已被确定为医疗保健转型的关键促进因素(Foley 等人,2017),但对于健康政策如何影响组织是否以及如何将公众纳入变革过程,人们知之甚少。本定性研究比较了英国四个卫生系统(英格兰、北爱尔兰、威尔士和苏格兰)在主要服务变革中涉及公众的政策和实践。我们分析了政策文件,并对官员、利益相关者、NHS 工作人员和公众活动家进行了访谈(受访者总数=47)。在所有四个系统中,让公众参与重大服务变革都被认为是一个政策挑战。尽管表面上存在相似之处,但四个卫生系统在让患者和公众参与卫生服务重大变革方面的过程还是存在一些明显的差异。中央政府监督的程度、政府指导的规定性、中介机构的作用以及对有争议决定进行独立审查的安排都有所不同。我们分析了四个系统中的卫生政策如何利用“大棒”和“说教”来推动特定方法,并得出结论,政策和医疗保健组织试图实施变革的更广泛系统环境都是当代实践中重要且研究不足的方面。

相似文献

9
Primary care in the UK: understanding the dynamics of devolution.英国的初级医疗保健:理解权力下放的动态变化
Health Soc Care Community. 2001 Sep;9(5):266-78. doi: 10.1046/j.0966-0410.2001.00306.x.

引用本文的文献

3
Health policy under the microscope: a micro policy design perspective.卫生政策透视:微观政策设计视角。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 14;11:1180836. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1180836. eCollection 2023.
6
Power and Purchasing: Why Strategic Purchasing Fails.权力与采购:战略采购为何失败。
Milbank Q. 2020 Sep;98(3):975-1020. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12471. Epub 2020 Aug 4.

本文引用的文献

1
The art and science of non-evaluation evaluation.非评价性评价的艺术与科学。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2018 Oct;23(4):262-267. doi: 10.1177/1355819618779614. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
6
Manifesto for a healthy and health-creating society.健康与创建健康社会宣言
Lancet. 2016 Dec 10;388(10062):e24-e27. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31801-3. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
8
Patterns of public participation.公众参与模式
J Health Organ Manag. 2016 Aug 15;30(5):751-68. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-03-2016-0037.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验