Suppr超能文献

无声处的回响:为性暴力和性虐待幸存者提供基层和创伤知情支持。

Out of the silence: towards grassroots and trauma-informed support for people who have experienced sexual violence and abuse.

机构信息

Population and Health Research Institute, St Georges, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, UK.

Independent Researcher, Hon. Research Associate, University of Bristol Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences and King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Dec;28(6):598-602. doi: 10.1017/S2045796019000131. Epub 2019 Apr 12.

Abstract

To experience sexual violence and abuse is to experience silence. This commentary explores some of the ways in which psychiatry reinforces the silencing of sexual violence survivors. We argue that current psychiatric responses to sexual violence typically constitute iatrogenic harm including through: a failure to provide services that meet survivors' needs, a failure to believe or validate disclosures; experiences of medicalisation and diagnoses which can delegitimise people's own knowledge and meaning; 'power over' relational approaches which can prevent compassionate responses and result in staff having to develop their own coping strategies; and poorly addressed and reported experiences of sexual violence within psychiatric settings. We argue that these multiple forms of silencing have arisen in part because of biomedical dominance, a lack of support and training in sexual violence for staff, inconsistent access to structured, reflective supervision, and the difficulties of facing the horror of sexual violence and abuse. We then describe community-based and grassroots responses, and consider the potential of trauma-informed approaches. Whilst this paper has a UK focus, some aspects will resonate globally, particularly given that Western psychiatry is increasingly being exported around the globe.

摘要

遭受性暴力和虐待就是在经历沉默。这篇评论探讨了精神病学在哪些方面强化了性暴力幸存者的沉默。我们认为,目前精神病学对性暴力的反应通常构成医源性伤害,包括:未能提供满足幸存者需求的服务,未能相信或验证披露;经历医学化和诊断,这可能会使人们自己的知识和意义合法化;“权力至上”的关系方法,这可能会阻止富有同情心的反应,并导致工作人员不得不制定自己的应对策略;以及在精神病学环境中处理和报告性暴力经验的不足。我们认为,这些多种形式的沉默的出现部分是由于生物医学的主导地位、工作人员在性暴力方面缺乏支持和培训、获得结构化、反思性监督的机会不一致,以及面对性暴力和虐待的恐怖的困难。然后,我们描述了基于社区和基层的应对措施,并考虑了创伤知情方法的潜力。虽然本文以英国为重点,但其中一些方面在全球范围内具有共鸣,特别是考虑到西方精神病学在全球范围内的日益普及。

相似文献

7
Sexual violence and mental health.性暴力与心理健康。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Dec;28(6):592-593. doi: 10.1017/S2045796019000106. Epub 2019 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
(Mis)understanding trauma-informed approaches in mental health.对心理健康领域创伤知情方法的(误)解
J Ment Health. 2018 Oct;27(5):383-387. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2018.1520973. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
6
Violence against women and mental health.针对妇女的暴力行为与心理健康
Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;4(2):159-170. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30261-9. Epub 2016 Nov 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验