• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家禽屠体冲洗除菌的采样方法比较及其影响

Comparison of Sampling Methods and Implications for Bacterial Decontamination of Poultry Carcasses by Rinsing.

作者信息

Lillard H S

机构信息

United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Richard B. Russell Agricultural Research Center, P.O. Box 5677, Athens, Georgia 30613.

出版信息

J Food Prot. 1988 May;51(5):405-408. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-51.5.405.

DOI:10.4315/0362-028X-51.5.405
PMID:30978893
Abstract

This study showed that the whole carcass rinse and the stomaching or blending of excised skin techniques for sampling broilers, as commonly used, result in the isolation of comparable numbers of aerobes and Enterobacteriaceae . However, these data also show that all three methods recover only a very small percentage of the total bacteria present on broiler carcasses. Large numbers of bacteria were still recovered from the fortieth rinse of a single carcass, indicating that increased rinsing after bacteria become firmly attached to the carcass will only result in a slight reduction of the total bacterial load present, and will not result in a meaningful improvement in bacterial quality of the carcass.

摘要

本研究表明,常用的对肉鸡进行整只胴体冲洗以及对切除皮肤进行匀浆或搅拌的采样技术,分离出的需氧菌和肠杆菌科数量相当。然而,这些数据也表明,这三种方法仅能回收肉鸡胴体上存在的细菌总数的极小百分比。从单个胴体的第40次冲洗中仍能回收大量细菌,这表明在细菌牢固附着于胴体后增加冲洗次数只会使胴体上存在的细菌总数略有减少,而不会使胴体的细菌质量得到有意义的改善。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Sampling Methods and Implications for Bacterial Decontamination of Poultry Carcasses by Rinsing.家禽屠体冲洗除菌的采样方法比较及其影响
J Food Prot. 1988 May;51(5):405-408. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-51.5.405.
2
Effectiveness of Sampling Methods for Salmonella Detection on Processed Broilers.加工肉鸡中沙门氏菌检测抽样方法的有效性
J Food Prot. 1978 May;41(5):341-343. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-41.5.341.
3
Incidence and Recovery of Salmonellae and Other Bacteria from Commercially Processed Poultry Carcasses at Selected Pre- and Post-Evisceration Steps.在选定的去内脏前后步骤中,从商业加工的家禽胴体中分离沙门氏菌和其他细菌的发生率及回收率。
J Food Prot. 1989 Feb;52(2):88-91. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-52.2.88.
4
Effects of Sampling Method and Feed Withdrawal Period on Recovery of Microorganisms from Poultry Carcasses .
J Food Prot. 1989 Jul;52(7):480-483. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-52.7.480.
5
Factors Affecting the Persistence of Salmonella During the Processing of Poultry.影响家禽加工过程中沙门氏菌存活的因素。
J Food Prot. 1989 Nov;52(11):829-832. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-52.11.829.
6
Sampling naturally contaminated broiler carcasses for Salmonella by three different methods.采用三种不同方法对受污染的肉鸡胴体进行沙门氏菌抽样。
J Food Prot. 2014 Mar;77(3):493-5. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-320.
7
Recovery of bacteria from broiler carcasses rinsed zero and twenty-four hours after immersion chilling.从浸水冷却是零小时和二十四小时后冲洗的肉鸡胴体中回收细菌。
Poult Sci. 2006 Feb;85(2):333-6. doi: 10.1093/ps/85.2.333.
8
The effects on the microbiological condition of product of carcass dressing, cooling, and portioning processes at a poultry packing plant.家禽屠宰加工厂胴体修整、冷却及分割过程对产品微生物状况的影响。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2006 Jul 15;110(2):187-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.04.020. Epub 2006 Jun 21.
9
Estimating removal rates of bacteria from poultry carcasses using two whole-carcass rinse volumes.采用两种全胴体冲洗量估算从家禽胴体中去除细菌的去除率。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2010 May 15;139(3):140-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.03.022. Epub 2010 Mar 20.
10
Comparison of weep and carcass rinses for recovery of Campylobacter from retail broiler carcasses.用于从零售肉用仔鸡胴体中回收弯曲杆菌的流泪液和胴体冲洗液的比较。
J Food Prot. 2003 Sep;66(9):1720-3. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-66.9.1720.

引用本文的文献

1
Microbial Decontamination of Beef Carcass Surfaces by Lactic Acid, Acetic Acid, and Trisodium Phosphate Sprays.乳酸、乙酸和磷酸三钠喷雾对牛肉胴体表面微生物的消毒作用。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Nov 2;2020:2324358. doi: 10.1155/2020/2324358. eCollection 2020.